K. R. Pollard, A. Bice, L. Durack, T. Lewellen, R. Miyaoka, S. Kohlmyer
{"title":"使用列表模式数据比较I-131成像中的散射校正","authors":"K. R. Pollard, A. Bice, L. Durack, T. Lewellen, R. Miyaoka, S. Kohlmyer","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gamma camera imaging of I-131 suffers from detection of Compton-scattered events. Many different methods of scatter correction have been proposed for lower-energy radionuclide (e.g., Tc-99m) imaging. Extension of these scatter corrections to I-131 imaging is not obvious and may not be simple, because a significant fraction of the detected scatter is due to gamma rays that have scattered in the camera-head. The authors acquired list-mode data (x, y and E) from a digital gamma camera and rebinned it in different ways to compare five different scatter-correction techniques: lower-window subtraction, upper-window subtraction, upper and lower window subtraction, linear dual photopeak, and nonlinear dual photopeak. A lower, Compton-window subtraction appears most stable, and perhaps best.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":447239,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using list-mode data to compare scatter corrections in I-131 imaging\",\"authors\":\"K. R. Pollard, A. Bice, L. Durack, T. Lewellen, R. Miyaoka, S. Kohlmyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gamma camera imaging of I-131 suffers from detection of Compton-scattered events. Many different methods of scatter correction have been proposed for lower-energy radionuclide (e.g., Tc-99m) imaging. Extension of these scatter corrections to I-131 imaging is not obvious and may not be simple, because a significant fraction of the detected scatter is due to gamma rays that have scattered in the camera-head. The authors acquired list-mode data (x, y and E) from a digital gamma camera and rebinned it in different ways to compare five different scatter-correction techniques: lower-window subtraction, upper-window subtraction, upper and lower window subtraction, linear dual photopeak, and nonlinear dual photopeak. A lower, Compton-window subtraction appears most stable, and perhaps best.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":447239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1992.301065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using list-mode data to compare scatter corrections in I-131 imaging
Gamma camera imaging of I-131 suffers from detection of Compton-scattered events. Many different methods of scatter correction have been proposed for lower-energy radionuclide (e.g., Tc-99m) imaging. Extension of these scatter corrections to I-131 imaging is not obvious and may not be simple, because a significant fraction of the detected scatter is due to gamma rays that have scattered in the camera-head. The authors acquired list-mode data (x, y and E) from a digital gamma camera and rebinned it in different ways to compare five different scatter-correction techniques: lower-window subtraction, upper-window subtraction, upper and lower window subtraction, linear dual photopeak, and nonlinear dual photopeak. A lower, Compton-window subtraction appears most stable, and perhaps best.<>