选择合适的工具进行建筑物气流模拟

E. Djunaedy, J. Hensen, M. Loomans
{"title":"选择合适的工具进行建筑物气流模拟","authors":"E. Djunaedy, J. Hensen, M. Loomans","doi":"10.1191/0143624404bt109oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of technology, and with the widespread availability of simulation tools, we are forced to consider which simulation tool would be appropriate for a particular problem. This seemingly trivial decision is in reality not very easy to make. Very often this leads to the practice of using the most sophisticated tool available for every problem. The levels of resolution and complexity of simulations are directly related to the accuracy of the simulation and to the total cost of the simulation process. A simple tool may be cheaper, but there is a high risk of inaccuracy. An advanced tool could be more accurate, but it needs a huge amount of resource in terms of computing power, labour, and the advanced knowledge to perform the simulation and interpret the results. This paper proposes a guideline for selecting a simulation tool for airflow prediction. Sensitivity analysis is selected as the tool for decision making. A case study is used to highlight the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":272488,"journal":{"name":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting an appropriate tool for airflow simulation in buildings\",\"authors\":\"E. Djunaedy, J. Hensen, M. Loomans\",\"doi\":\"10.1191/0143624404bt109oa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advancement of technology, and with the widespread availability of simulation tools, we are forced to consider which simulation tool would be appropriate for a particular problem. This seemingly trivial decision is in reality not very easy to make. Very often this leads to the practice of using the most sophisticated tool available for every problem. The levels of resolution and complexity of simulations are directly related to the accuracy of the simulation and to the total cost of the simulation process. A simple tool may be cheaper, but there is a high risk of inaccuracy. An advanced tool could be more accurate, but it needs a huge amount of resource in terms of computing power, labour, and the advanced knowledge to perform the simulation and interpret the results. This paper proposes a guideline for selecting a simulation tool for airflow prediction. Sensitivity analysis is selected as the tool for decision making. A case study is used to highlight the proposed method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624404bt109oa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624404bt109oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

随着技术的进步和仿真工具的广泛使用,我们不得不考虑哪种仿真工具适合于特定的问题。这个看似微不足道的决定实际上并不容易做出。这通常会导致对每个问题都使用最复杂的工具。模拟的分辨率和复杂程度直接关系到模拟的准确性和模拟过程的总成本。一个简单的工具可能更便宜,但有很高的不准确的风险。高级工具可能更准确,但它需要大量的计算能力、人力和高级知识来执行模拟和解释结果。本文提出了气流预报模拟工具选择的指导原则。选择敏感性分析作为决策工具。通过一个案例研究来说明所提出的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selecting an appropriate tool for airflow simulation in buildings
With the advancement of technology, and with the widespread availability of simulation tools, we are forced to consider which simulation tool would be appropriate for a particular problem. This seemingly trivial decision is in reality not very easy to make. Very often this leads to the practice of using the most sophisticated tool available for every problem. The levels of resolution and complexity of simulations are directly related to the accuracy of the simulation and to the total cost of the simulation process. A simple tool may be cheaper, but there is a high risk of inaccuracy. An advanced tool could be more accurate, but it needs a huge amount of resource in terms of computing power, labour, and the advanced knowledge to perform the simulation and interpret the results. This paper proposes a guideline for selecting a simulation tool for airflow prediction. Sensitivity analysis is selected as the tool for decision making. A case study is used to highlight the proposed method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real coded genetic algorithm in operational optimization of a district cooling system: An inceptive applicability assessment and power saving evaluation Producing domestic energy benchmarks using a large disaggregate stock model An indoor airflow distribution predictor using machine learning for a real-time healthy building monitoring system in the tropics Producing domestic energy benchmarks using a large disaggregate stock model An indoor airflow distribution predictor using machine learning for a real-time healthy building monitoring system in the tropics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1