比较各种估计串扰的测量和仿真技术

J. L. Rotgerink, Georgios Erotas, N. Moonen, F. Leferink
{"title":"比较各种估计串扰的测量和仿真技术","authors":"J. L. Rotgerink, Georgios Erotas, N. Moonen, F. Leferink","doi":"10.1109/EMCEUROPE48519.2020.9245852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison between crosstalk measurement techniques is made to investigate their applicability and efficiency for determining crosstalk between cables above a ground plane made of copper or carbon-fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP). Cost effectiveness, accuracy, speed and complexity of the methods are evaluated. All measurements are performed on two PCBs containing two pairs of copper traces. The techniques that are considered include balanced Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) measurements, balanced Spectrum Analyzer (SA) measurements, balanced EMI receiver (EMI-R) measurements, single-ended VNA measurements converted to mixed-mode S-parameters, and finally measurements with a signal generator (SG) and an oscilloscope (OSC). For verification, measured results are also compared to three simulation techniques, involving a Method of Moments simulation and two different transmission line models.","PeriodicalId":332251,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Various Measurement and Simulation Techniques for Estimating Crosstalk\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Rotgerink, Georgios Erotas, N. Moonen, F. Leferink\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMCEUROPE48519.2020.9245852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison between crosstalk measurement techniques is made to investigate their applicability and efficiency for determining crosstalk between cables above a ground plane made of copper or carbon-fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP). Cost effectiveness, accuracy, speed and complexity of the methods are evaluated. All measurements are performed on two PCBs containing two pairs of copper traces. The techniques that are considered include balanced Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) measurements, balanced Spectrum Analyzer (SA) measurements, balanced EMI receiver (EMI-R) measurements, single-ended VNA measurements converted to mixed-mode S-parameters, and finally measurements with a signal generator (SG) and an oscilloscope (OSC). For verification, measured results are also compared to three simulation techniques, involving a Method of Moments simulation and two different transmission line models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEUROPE48519.2020.9245852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCEUROPE48519.2020.9245852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

比较了两种串扰测量技术,探讨了它们在铜或碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)接平面以上电缆串扰测量中的适用性和效率。评估了这些方法的成本效益、准确性、速度和复杂性。所有的测量都是在两个pcb上进行的,pcb上有两对铜线。所考虑的技术包括平衡矢量网络分析仪(VNA)测量、平衡频谱分析仪(SA)测量、平衡EMI接收器(EMI- r)测量、转换为混合模式s参数的单端VNA测量,以及最后使用信号发生器(SG)和示波器(OSC)进行的测量。为了验证,还将测量结果与三种仿真技术进行了比较,包括矩量法仿真和两种不同的传输线模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Various Measurement and Simulation Techniques for Estimating Crosstalk
A comparison between crosstalk measurement techniques is made to investigate their applicability and efficiency for determining crosstalk between cables above a ground plane made of copper or carbon-fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP). Cost effectiveness, accuracy, speed and complexity of the methods are evaluated. All measurements are performed on two PCBs containing two pairs of copper traces. The techniques that are considered include balanced Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) measurements, balanced Spectrum Analyzer (SA) measurements, balanced EMI receiver (EMI-R) measurements, single-ended VNA measurements converted to mixed-mode S-parameters, and finally measurements with a signal generator (SG) and an oscilloscope (OSC). For verification, measured results are also compared to three simulation techniques, involving a Method of Moments simulation and two different transmission line models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhanced Circuit Model for Insertion Loss Prediction of Active EMI Filters Considering Non-ideal Parameters EMC EUROPE 2020 Index Interference Path Loss Measurements of Beechcraft B300 Aircraft at 4 GHz Wireless Avionics Intra-Communication Band NSA chamber validation measurements below 30 MHz using loop antennas Effect of Electric Field on the Magnetic Probe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1