社会智力在主观认知障碍发展的背景下

E. Yakupov, A. S. Bakanova, Rimma A. Zhamieva
{"title":"社会智力在主观认知障碍发展的背景下","authors":"E. Yakupov, A. S. Bakanova, Rimma A. Zhamieva","doi":"10.17816/nb106918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND. The presented literature review reveals the topic of subjective cognitive impairment in the context of social intelligence disorders as one of the most important components of cognitive functions. \nAIM. Analysis of existing literature data on subjective cognitive impairments and assessment of social intelligence. \nMATERIAL AND METHODS. Various sources were considered during conducting a literature review on the selected topic. The search depth was more than 15 years. Russian and foreign sources were studied on Internet platforms such as Web of science, UpToDate, PubMed, Medscape, eLIBRARY for selection of literature. \nRESULTS. The paper compares the types of cognitive disorders and the main differences between the group of subjective disorders and other pronounced forms of cognitive disorders. The key differences include the impossibility of making a diagnosis based on the results of neuropsychological testing, the absence of a clinically pronounced syndrome and difficulties in performing everyday tasks. The connection of social intelligence with factors adversely affecting the state of health is considered, and a generalizing characteristic of social intelligence as a separate cognitive function is presented. \nCONCLUSION. The low detectability of subjective cognitive impairments is associated with ignorance of their severity on the part of both the doctor and the patient. There is a problem of adequate methods for assessing subjective cognitive impairment using neuropsychological testing, including determining the level of social intelligence. The most accurate method of assessing social intelligence is the Guilford test.","PeriodicalId":436189,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Bulletin","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social intelligence in the context of the development of subjective cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"E. Yakupov, A. S. Bakanova, Rimma A. Zhamieva\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/nb106918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND. The presented literature review reveals the topic of subjective cognitive impairment in the context of social intelligence disorders as one of the most important components of cognitive functions. \\nAIM. Analysis of existing literature data on subjective cognitive impairments and assessment of social intelligence. \\nMATERIAL AND METHODS. Various sources were considered during conducting a literature review on the selected topic. The search depth was more than 15 years. Russian and foreign sources were studied on Internet platforms such as Web of science, UpToDate, PubMed, Medscape, eLIBRARY for selection of literature. \\nRESULTS. The paper compares the types of cognitive disorders and the main differences between the group of subjective disorders and other pronounced forms of cognitive disorders. The key differences include the impossibility of making a diagnosis based on the results of neuropsychological testing, the absence of a clinically pronounced syndrome and difficulties in performing everyday tasks. The connection of social intelligence with factors adversely affecting the state of health is considered, and a generalizing characteristic of social intelligence as a separate cognitive function is presented. \\nCONCLUSION. The low detectability of subjective cognitive impairments is associated with ignorance of their severity on the part of both the doctor and the patient. There is a problem of adequate methods for assessing subjective cognitive impairment using neuropsychological testing, including determining the level of social intelligence. The most accurate method of assessing social intelligence is the Guilford test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/nb106918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/nb106918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。本文对社会智力障碍背景下的主观认知障碍作为认知功能的重要组成部分进行了综述。的目标。主观认知障碍与社会智力评估的现有文献资料分析。材料和方法。在对所选主题进行文献综述时,考虑了各种来源。搜寻深度超过15年。在Web of science, UpToDate, PubMed, Medscape, library等互联网平台上研究俄罗斯和国外来源,以选择文献。结果。本文比较了认知障碍的类型和主观性障碍组与其他显著形式的认知障碍的主要区别。关键的区别包括无法根据神经心理学测试的结果做出诊断,没有临床明显的综合症,以及在执行日常任务时遇到困难。社会智力与影响健康状况的因素之间的联系被认为是不利的,并提出了社会智力作为一种单独的认知功能的概括特征。结论。主观认知障碍的低可检测性与医生和患者对其严重程度的无知有关。目前存在一个问题,即使用神经心理学测试来评估主观认知障碍,包括确定社会智力水平。评估社会智力最准确的方法是吉尔福德测验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social intelligence in the context of the development of subjective cognitive impairment
BACKGROUND. The presented literature review reveals the topic of subjective cognitive impairment in the context of social intelligence disorders as one of the most important components of cognitive functions. AIM. Analysis of existing literature data on subjective cognitive impairments and assessment of social intelligence. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Various sources were considered during conducting a literature review on the selected topic. The search depth was more than 15 years. Russian and foreign sources were studied on Internet platforms such as Web of science, UpToDate, PubMed, Medscape, eLIBRARY for selection of literature. RESULTS. The paper compares the types of cognitive disorders and the main differences between the group of subjective disorders and other pronounced forms of cognitive disorders. The key differences include the impossibility of making a diagnosis based on the results of neuropsychological testing, the absence of a clinically pronounced syndrome and difficulties in performing everyday tasks. The connection of social intelligence with factors adversely affecting the state of health is considered, and a generalizing characteristic of social intelligence as a separate cognitive function is presented. CONCLUSION. The low detectability of subjective cognitive impairments is associated with ignorance of their severity on the part of both the doctor and the patient. There is a problem of adequate methods for assessing subjective cognitive impairment using neuropsychological testing, including determining the level of social intelligence. The most accurate method of assessing social intelligence is the Guilford test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology and psychopathology of overvalue hobby schoolshooing ideas. The case of Katerina and Yakov Phenomenological approach in psychotherapy Comparative analysis of the clinical and social characteristics of persons with organic mental disorders suffering from mental retardation who have repeatedly committed socially dangerous acts Characteristics of depression treatment in men with testosterone deficiency Spiritual orientation of the psychological rehabilitation of combatants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1