基于词和子词单位的位置后验格与混淆网络在口语文档索引中的分析比较

Yi-Cheng Pan, Hung-lin Chang, Lin-Shan Lee
{"title":"基于词和子词单位的位置后验格与混淆网络在口语文档索引中的分析比较","authors":"Yi-Cheng Pan, Hung-lin Chang, Lin-Shan Lee","doi":"10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analytically compare the two widely accepted approaches of spoken document indexing, position specific posterior lattices (PSPL) and confusion network (CN), in terms of retrieval accuracy and index size. The fundamental distinctions between these two approaches in terms of construction units, posterior probabilities, number of clusters, indexing coverage and space requirements are discussed in detail. A new approach to approximate subword posterior probability in a word lattice is also incorporated in PSPL/CN to handle OOV/rare word problems, which were unaddressed in original PSPL and CN approaches. Extensive experimental results on Chinese broadcast news segments indicate that PSPL offers higher accuracy than CN but requiring much larger disk space, while subword-based PSPL turns out to be very attractive because it lowers the storage cost while offers even higher accuracies.","PeriodicalId":371729,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding (ASRU)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical comparison between position specific posterior lattices and confusion networks based on words and subword units for spoken document indexing\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Cheng Pan, Hung-lin Chang, Lin-Shan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we analytically compare the two widely accepted approaches of spoken document indexing, position specific posterior lattices (PSPL) and confusion network (CN), in terms of retrieval accuracy and index size. The fundamental distinctions between these two approaches in terms of construction units, posterior probabilities, number of clusters, indexing coverage and space requirements are discussed in detail. A new approach to approximate subword posterior probability in a word lattice is also incorporated in PSPL/CN to handle OOV/rare word problems, which were unaddressed in original PSPL and CN approaches. Extensive experimental results on Chinese broadcast news segments indicate that PSPL offers higher accuracy than CN but requiring much larger disk space, while subword-based PSPL turns out to be very attractive because it lowers the storage cost while offers even higher accuracies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding (ASRU)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding (ASRU)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding (ASRU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

在本文中,我们分析比较了两种被广泛接受的口语文献索引方法,定位后验格(PSPL)和混淆网络(CN),在检索精度和索引大小方面。详细讨论了这两种方法在构造单元、后验概率、聚类数量、索引覆盖范围和空间要求方面的基本区别。在PSPL/CN中引入了一种新的近似词格中子词后验概率的方法来处理原始PSPL和CN方法未解决的OOV/罕见词问题。在中文广播新闻片段上的大量实验结果表明,PSPL比CN具有更高的准确性,但需要更大的磁盘空间,而基于子词的PSPL则非常有吸引力,因为它降低了存储成本,同时提供了更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytical comparison between position specific posterior lattices and confusion networks based on words and subword units for spoken document indexing
In this paper we analytically compare the two widely accepted approaches of spoken document indexing, position specific posterior lattices (PSPL) and confusion network (CN), in terms of retrieval accuracy and index size. The fundamental distinctions between these two approaches in terms of construction units, posterior probabilities, number of clusters, indexing coverage and space requirements are discussed in detail. A new approach to approximate subword posterior probability in a word lattice is also incorporated in PSPL/CN to handle OOV/rare word problems, which were unaddressed in original PSPL and CN approaches. Extensive experimental results on Chinese broadcast news segments indicate that PSPL offers higher accuracy than CN but requiring much larger disk space, while subword-based PSPL turns out to be very attractive because it lowers the storage cost while offers even higher accuracies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive linear transforms for noise robust speech recognition Development of a phonetic system for large vocabulary Arabic speech recognition Error simulation for training statistical dialogue systems An enhanced minimum classification error learning framework for balancing insertion, deletion and substitution errors Monolingual and crosslingual comparison of tandem features derived from articulatory and phone MLPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1