谢尔盖·埃夫隆对列夫·卡尔萨文说:“但是你的位置是空的!”“左派”欧亚人的信件给l.p. karsavin作为克拉马尔斯基分裂的编年史

K. B. Ermishina, V. I. Sharonov
{"title":"谢尔盖·埃夫隆对列夫·卡尔萨文说:“但是你的位置是空的!”“左派”欧亚人的信件给l.p. karsavin作为克拉马尔斯基分裂的编年史","authors":"K. B. Ermishina, V. I. Sharonov","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preface and the documents presented are about the split of the Eurasian movement in the late 1920s. For the first time archival materials are being introduced into scientific circulation, revealing the details of the split into two opposing groups of Eurasians. The first group operated in Prague, its leader was P.N. Savitsky. They defended an apolitical, anti-communist, anti-Marxist position, continued to develop the traditions of classical Eurasianism. The second group under the leadership of P.P. Suvchinsky was formed in Paris, it is considered responsible for the politicization of the movement, Marxist and Sovietophile sentiments. Such a scheme has become familiar, but the published documents introduce new adjustments and details important for the history of Russian thought. The publication and scientific comments reveal the role of the organization “Trust” (OGPU) in the split, the composition of the authors of the newspaper “Eurasia” and its thematic focus. The positions of the parties are clarified, and the question of the ideological side of the Eurasian split of 1928–1929 is raised.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SERGEY EFRON TO LEV KARSAVIN: “BUT YOUR PLACE IS EMPTY!”. LETTERS OF THE “LEFT” EURASIANS TO L.P. KARSAVIN AS A CHRONICLE OF THE KLAMARSKY SPLIT\",\"authors\":\"K. B. Ermishina, V. I. Sharonov\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The preface and the documents presented are about the split of the Eurasian movement in the late 1920s. For the first time archival materials are being introduced into scientific circulation, revealing the details of the split into two opposing groups of Eurasians. The first group operated in Prague, its leader was P.N. Savitsky. They defended an apolitical, anti-communist, anti-Marxist position, continued to develop the traditions of classical Eurasianism. The second group under the leadership of P.P. Suvchinsky was formed in Paris, it is considered responsible for the politicization of the movement, Marxist and Sovietophile sentiments. Such a scheme has become familiar, but the published documents introduce new adjustments and details important for the history of Russian thought. The publication and scientific comments reveal the role of the organization “Trust” (OGPU) in the split, the composition of the authors of the newspaper “Eurasia” and its thematic focus. The positions of the parties are clarified, and the question of the ideological side of the Eurasian split of 1928–1929 is raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言和所提供的文献是关于20世纪20年代末欧亚运动的分裂。档案材料首次被引入科学流通,揭示了欧亚人分裂成两个对立群体的细节。第一个组织在布拉格运作,其领导人是P.N.萨维茨基。他们捍卫一种非政治的、反共的、反马克思主义的立场,继续发展古典欧亚主义的传统。在P.P. Suvchinsky领导下的第二个团体在巴黎成立,它被认为对运动、马克思主义和亲苏情绪的政治化负有责任。这样的方案已为人们所熟悉,但出版的文件引入了新的调整和对俄罗斯思想史很重要的细节。该出版物和科学评论揭示了“信任”组织(OGPU)在分裂中的作用,“欧亚”报纸作者的组成及其主题重点。澄清了各方的立场,提出了1928-1929年欧亚分裂的意识形态方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SERGEY EFRON TO LEV KARSAVIN: “BUT YOUR PLACE IS EMPTY!”. LETTERS OF THE “LEFT” EURASIANS TO L.P. KARSAVIN AS A CHRONICLE OF THE KLAMARSKY SPLIT
The preface and the documents presented are about the split of the Eurasian movement in the late 1920s. For the first time archival materials are being introduced into scientific circulation, revealing the details of the split into two opposing groups of Eurasians. The first group operated in Prague, its leader was P.N. Savitsky. They defended an apolitical, anti-communist, anti-Marxist position, continued to develop the traditions of classical Eurasianism. The second group under the leadership of P.P. Suvchinsky was formed in Paris, it is considered responsible for the politicization of the movement, Marxist and Sovietophile sentiments. Such a scheme has become familiar, but the published documents introduce new adjustments and details important for the history of Russian thought. The publication and scientific comments reveal the role of the organization “Trust” (OGPU) in the split, the composition of the authors of the newspaper “Eurasia” and its thematic focus. The positions of the parties are clarified, and the question of the ideological side of the Eurasian split of 1928–1929 is raised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE LABOR METAMORPHOSWES. MODERN INTERPRETATIONS THE MANOR HOUSE STYLE “QUEEN ANNE” IN LATE VICTORIAN ESTATE ARCHITECTURE. FEATURES OF THE LAYOUT AND FACADE DECORATION FEATURES OF SELF-ATTITUDE OF GIRLS ORGANIZATION OF SACRED LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANNING OF OCEANIC PEOPLES EMERGING FROM QUARANTINE. THE NIGHT OF THE INTELLECTUALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1