关于名字的正确性

Tatiana Suvorkina
{"title":"关于名字的正确性","authors":"Tatiana Suvorkina","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prodicus of Ceos was rightfully considered one of the most famous sophists of his time. However neither research in the field of rhetoric, nor examples of eloquence and sophisticated argumentation (although, undoubtedly, all this was also his area of interest) are his main legacy. This paper will focus on his method of comparing synony-mous words, which was used to determine their exact meaning and identify differences. This method was the result of a deep interest in the study of language and, perhaps, was a response to the skepticism of contemporaries about what can be considered real and the moral relativism that flowed from such views.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRODICUS ON CORRECTNESS OF NAMES\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Suvorkina\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prodicus of Ceos was rightfully considered one of the most famous sophists of his time. However neither research in the field of rhetoric, nor examples of eloquence and sophisticated argumentation (although, undoubtedly, all this was also his area of interest) are his main legacy. This paper will focus on his method of comparing synony-mous words, which was used to determine their exact meaning and identify differences. This method was the result of a deep interest in the study of language and, perhaps, was a response to the skepticism of contemporaries about what can be considered real and the moral relativism that flowed from such views.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首席执行官中的普罗迪库斯理所当然地被认为是他那个时代最著名的诡辩家之一。然而,无论是修辞学领域的研究,还是口才和复杂论证的例子(尽管,毫无疑问,所有这些都是他感兴趣的领域)都不是他的主要遗产。本文将重点介绍他比较同义词的方法,这种方法是用来确定它们的确切意义和识别差异。这种方法是对语言研究的浓厚兴趣的结果,也许是对同时代人对什么可以被认为是真实的以及由此产生的道德相对主义的怀疑态度的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRODICUS ON CORRECTNESS OF NAMES
Prodicus of Ceos was rightfully considered one of the most famous sophists of his time. However neither research in the field of rhetoric, nor examples of eloquence and sophisticated argumentation (although, undoubtedly, all this was also his area of interest) are his main legacy. This paper will focus on his method of comparing synony-mous words, which was used to determine their exact meaning and identify differences. This method was the result of a deep interest in the study of language and, perhaps, was a response to the skepticism of contemporaries about what can be considered real and the moral relativism that flowed from such views.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1