乐观和悲观偏好对决策的影响

Soosung Hwang, S. Satchell
{"title":"乐观和悲观偏好对决策的影响","authors":"Soosung Hwang, S. Satchell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2306023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of optimism or pessimism is defined in the psychology literature in terms of forecasting where the term is used more generally than in statistics. Here we use the theory of loss aversion combined with Bayesian forecasting to propose rather precise definitions of optimism and pessimism. Put simply, optimists are those who condition their Bayesian state probabilities on optimistic forecasts whilst pessimists condition their Bayesian state probabilities on pessimistic forecasts. This simple structure leads to closed-form results in asset allocation problems which can be seen as a solution of more general dichotomous problems. Our results with loss aversion utility show that a slightly optimistic (or pessimistic) preference would have a huge impact on the optimal asset allocation.","PeriodicalId":365118,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Optimistic and Pessimistic Preferences on Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"Soosung Hwang, S. Satchell\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2306023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of optimism or pessimism is defined in the psychology literature in terms of forecasting where the term is used more generally than in statistics. Here we use the theory of loss aversion combined with Bayesian forecasting to propose rather precise definitions of optimism and pessimism. Put simply, optimists are those who condition their Bayesian state probabilities on optimistic forecasts whilst pessimists condition their Bayesian state probabilities on pessimistic forecasts. This simple structure leads to closed-form results in asset allocation problems which can be seen as a solution of more general dichotomous problems. Our results with loss aversion utility show that a slightly optimistic (or pessimistic) preference would have a huge impact on the optimal asset allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在心理学文献中,乐观或悲观的概念是根据预测来定义的,这个术语在预测中比在统计学中使用得更广泛。在这里,我们使用损失厌恶理论结合贝叶斯预测提出了相当精确的乐观和悲观的定义。简单地说,乐观主义者是以乐观预测为条件的贝叶斯状态概率,而悲观主义者是以悲观预测为条件的贝叶斯状态概率。这种简单的结构导致资产配置问题的封闭结果,这可以被视为更一般的二分问题的解决方案。我们对损失厌恶效用的研究结果表明,稍微乐观(或悲观)的偏好会对最优资产配置产生巨大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Optimistic and Pessimistic Preferences on Decision Making
The notion of optimism or pessimism is defined in the psychology literature in terms of forecasting where the term is used more generally than in statistics. Here we use the theory of loss aversion combined with Bayesian forecasting to propose rather precise definitions of optimism and pessimism. Put simply, optimists are those who condition their Bayesian state probabilities on optimistic forecasts whilst pessimists condition their Bayesian state probabilities on pessimistic forecasts. This simple structure leads to closed-form results in asset allocation problems which can be seen as a solution of more general dichotomous problems. Our results with loss aversion utility show that a slightly optimistic (or pessimistic) preference would have a huge impact on the optimal asset allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Realignment of Political Tolerance in the United States The Financial Drivers of Populism in Europe The Confidence Earthquake: Seismic Shifts in Trust Why Biased Endorsements Can Manipulate Elections The Advantage of Incumbents in Coalitional Bargaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1