博弈论-它在伦理决策中的应用

S. Cavagnetto, Bruce Gahir
{"title":"博弈论-它在伦理决策中的应用","authors":"S. Cavagnetto, Bruce Gahir","doi":"10.2478/cris-2014-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The application of game theory according to Hargreaves-Heap and Varonfakis (1995) to understand human behaviour, and in particular ethical behaviour, is a valuable development, as game theory has gradually become one of the key frameworks to assist us in the understanding of social sciences. Esther (1982) and Aumann and Hart (1992) show that there are several studies that indicate the importance of a game theoretic framework in advancing our understanding of social behaviour and evolutionary sciences. Although the application of game theory in the above areas has largely been not formalised, its application in the fields of ethical conduct and human behaviour is at present developed in several respects with the gradual assistance of advances in related areas such as evolutionary biology and our understanding of group social behaviour. Game theory tends to be dominated by its assumptions concerning the non-rational nature of the dynamics existing within social structures and these processes are generally ignored or are sometimes difficult to model. Assumptions that are made concerning the cognitive abilities and beliefs about individuals are generally unrealistic, and this at times is the main criticism of game theoretic applications in our understanding of ethical behaviour. These are the lines followed by Solomon (1999) in his discussion on game theory when it is used to model scenarios in business ethics and in general in the business area. In particular, game theory tends to excessively emphasise the destructive obsession of the quantifiable outcomes and an artificial concept of competition. This modelling of competition is not exhaustive of human behaviour, but rather an oversimplification of the social dynamics in place in many different human contexts. The first objective of this paper is to offer a brief sketch of the historical developments that have taken place in game theory and some of its fundamental concepts through an analysis of the most important games that have found an application to the field of ethics. A second aim is that of providing the reader with a review of developments relating to evolutionary game theory that has deeply assisted our comprehension of ethical norms and their emergence in group behaviour. The final part of the paper will be dealing with some conclusive remarks from a methodological point of view on the main issues concerning applications of game theory to ethics.","PeriodicalId":440425,"journal":{"name":"CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Game Theory - Its Applications to Ethical Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"S. Cavagnetto, Bruce Gahir\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/cris-2014-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The application of game theory according to Hargreaves-Heap and Varonfakis (1995) to understand human behaviour, and in particular ethical behaviour, is a valuable development, as game theory has gradually become one of the key frameworks to assist us in the understanding of social sciences. Esther (1982) and Aumann and Hart (1992) show that there are several studies that indicate the importance of a game theoretic framework in advancing our understanding of social behaviour and evolutionary sciences. Although the application of game theory in the above areas has largely been not formalised, its application in the fields of ethical conduct and human behaviour is at present developed in several respects with the gradual assistance of advances in related areas such as evolutionary biology and our understanding of group social behaviour. Game theory tends to be dominated by its assumptions concerning the non-rational nature of the dynamics existing within social structures and these processes are generally ignored or are sometimes difficult to model. Assumptions that are made concerning the cognitive abilities and beliefs about individuals are generally unrealistic, and this at times is the main criticism of game theoretic applications in our understanding of ethical behaviour. These are the lines followed by Solomon (1999) in his discussion on game theory when it is used to model scenarios in business ethics and in general in the business area. In particular, game theory tends to excessively emphasise the destructive obsession of the quantifiable outcomes and an artificial concept of competition. This modelling of competition is not exhaustive of human behaviour, but rather an oversimplification of the social dynamics in place in many different human contexts. The first objective of this paper is to offer a brief sketch of the historical developments that have taken place in game theory and some of its fundamental concepts through an analysis of the most important games that have found an application to the field of ethics. A second aim is that of providing the reader with a review of developments relating to evolutionary game theory that has deeply assisted our comprehension of ethical norms and their emergence in group behaviour. The final part of the paper will be dealing with some conclusive remarks from a methodological point of view on the main issues concerning applications of game theory to ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/cris-2014-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cris-2014-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Hargreaves-Heap和Varonfakis(1995)将博弈论应用于理解人类行为,特别是道德行为,是一项有价值的发展,因为博弈论已逐渐成为帮助我们理解社会科学的关键框架之一。Esther(1982)和Aumann和Hart(1992)表明,有几项研究表明博弈论框架在促进我们对社会行为和进化科学的理解方面的重要性。虽然博弈论在上述领域的应用在很大程度上还没有正式确立,但在进化生物学和我们对群体社会行为的理解等相关领域的进步的逐步帮助下,博弈论在道德行为和人类行为领域的应用目前在几个方面得到了发展。博弈论往往被其关于社会结构中存在的动态的非理性性质的假设所主导,这些过程通常被忽视或有时难以建模。关于个人认知能力和信念的假设通常是不现实的,这有时是对博弈论在我们理解道德行为中的应用的主要批评。这些是所罗门(1999)在讨论博弈论时所遵循的路线,博弈论被用来模拟商业道德和一般商业领域的场景。特别是,博弈论倾向于过分强调对可量化结果的破坏性痴迷和人为的竞争概念。这种竞争模型并不是对人类行为的详尽描述,而是对许多不同人类环境中的社会动态的过度简化。本文的第一个目标是通过分析在伦理学领域中应用的最重要的游戏,简要介绍博弈论的历史发展及其一些基本概念。第二个目的是为读者提供与进化博弈论相关的发展综述,这些理论深刻地帮助我们理解道德规范及其在群体行为中的出现。本文的最后一部分将从方法论的角度对博弈论应用于伦理学的主要问题作一些结论性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Game Theory - Its Applications to Ethical Decision Making
Abstract The application of game theory according to Hargreaves-Heap and Varonfakis (1995) to understand human behaviour, and in particular ethical behaviour, is a valuable development, as game theory has gradually become one of the key frameworks to assist us in the understanding of social sciences. Esther (1982) and Aumann and Hart (1992) show that there are several studies that indicate the importance of a game theoretic framework in advancing our understanding of social behaviour and evolutionary sciences. Although the application of game theory in the above areas has largely been not formalised, its application in the fields of ethical conduct and human behaviour is at present developed in several respects with the gradual assistance of advances in related areas such as evolutionary biology and our understanding of group social behaviour. Game theory tends to be dominated by its assumptions concerning the non-rational nature of the dynamics existing within social structures and these processes are generally ignored or are sometimes difficult to model. Assumptions that are made concerning the cognitive abilities and beliefs about individuals are generally unrealistic, and this at times is the main criticism of game theoretic applications in our understanding of ethical behaviour. These are the lines followed by Solomon (1999) in his discussion on game theory when it is used to model scenarios in business ethics and in general in the business area. In particular, game theory tends to excessively emphasise the destructive obsession of the quantifiable outcomes and an artificial concept of competition. This modelling of competition is not exhaustive of human behaviour, but rather an oversimplification of the social dynamics in place in many different human contexts. The first objective of this paper is to offer a brief sketch of the historical developments that have taken place in game theory and some of its fundamental concepts through an analysis of the most important games that have found an application to the field of ethics. A second aim is that of providing the reader with a review of developments relating to evolutionary game theory that has deeply assisted our comprehension of ethical norms and their emergence in group behaviour. The final part of the paper will be dealing with some conclusive remarks from a methodological point of view on the main issues concerning applications of game theory to ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ontology Translation: The Semiotic Engineering of Content Management Systems Management of Culture Shock Emerging Business and Human Rights Standards: Internet Service Providers and Censorship Demands Cost of Equity in Emerging Markets Barter Online Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1