欧洲、美国和“钟摆政策”:外交政策范式在意大利外交政策中的重要性(1989-2005)

E. Brighi
{"title":"欧洲、美国和“钟摆政策”:外交政策范式在意大利外交政策中的重要性(1989-2005)","authors":"E. Brighi","doi":"10.1080/14613190701414103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the turn of the 20th century, after a few decades of turbulence, Italian foreign policy oscillated between two poles. On the one hand was the alliance with the rising power of the time, Germany, which Italy signed in 1882 and which had been strongly advocated at home by conservatives to both counter French influence and contain democratic sentiments. On the other was the informal alignment with England and France, the soon-to-be Entente Powers, which materialized after the rapprochement of 1902–1903, and promised to be especially advantageous in colonial matters. Until the breakout of the First World War (and indeed a few months into the war), Italy entertained good relations with both alignments, despite the obvious, mounting tension between Germany and England. Curiously, Italy’s multiple diplomatic allegiances were simply considered ‘complementary’ at the time, with Italy supposedly gaining security on the continent (thanks to the Triple Alliance) and in the Mediterranean (thanks to the Entente). It took the crisis of July 1914 to bring Rome’s diplomatic oscillation to an end, and make many realize how contradictory and ill-advised this ambivalent policy had been. Writing in the 1980s, the former Italian Ambassador to Washington Rinaldo Petrignani compared the wavering, oscillatory behaviour of liberal Italy’s foreign policy to the trajectory of a pendulum, periodically swinging from proFrench/English to pro-German/Austrian policies. To explain this curious trajectory, Petrignani considers international and geopolitical factors, as well as domestic issues, but finally settles for a third explanation which echoes Federico Chabod’s own positions, arguing that it was the alternation of pro-French and proGerman ideas, more than anything else, which accounted for the swinging from one alignment to the other. Strategic and domestic factors were of course important, but ideas were just as much, if not more, to explain Italy’s oscillatory foreign policy.","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europe, the USA and the ‘policy of the pendulum’: the importance of foreign policy paradigms in the foreign policy of Italy (1989–2005)\",\"authors\":\"E. Brighi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190701414103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the turn of the 20th century, after a few decades of turbulence, Italian foreign policy oscillated between two poles. On the one hand was the alliance with the rising power of the time, Germany, which Italy signed in 1882 and which had been strongly advocated at home by conservatives to both counter French influence and contain democratic sentiments. On the other was the informal alignment with England and France, the soon-to-be Entente Powers, which materialized after the rapprochement of 1902–1903, and promised to be especially advantageous in colonial matters. Until the breakout of the First World War (and indeed a few months into the war), Italy entertained good relations with both alignments, despite the obvious, mounting tension between Germany and England. Curiously, Italy’s multiple diplomatic allegiances were simply considered ‘complementary’ at the time, with Italy supposedly gaining security on the continent (thanks to the Triple Alliance) and in the Mediterranean (thanks to the Entente). It took the crisis of July 1914 to bring Rome’s diplomatic oscillation to an end, and make many realize how contradictory and ill-advised this ambivalent policy had been. Writing in the 1980s, the former Italian Ambassador to Washington Rinaldo Petrignani compared the wavering, oscillatory behaviour of liberal Italy’s foreign policy to the trajectory of a pendulum, periodically swinging from proFrench/English to pro-German/Austrian policies. To explain this curious trajectory, Petrignani considers international and geopolitical factors, as well as domestic issues, but finally settles for a third explanation which echoes Federico Chabod’s own positions, arguing that it was the alternation of pro-French and proGerman ideas, more than anything else, which accounted for the swinging from one alignment to the other. Strategic and domestic factors were of course important, but ideas were just as much, if not more, to explain Italy’s oscillatory foreign policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701414103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701414103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

20世纪之交,在经历了几十年的动荡之后,意大利的外交政策在两极之间摇摆。一方面是与当时正在崛起的大国德国的联盟,意大利于1882年与德国签署了该联盟,该联盟在国内受到保守派的强烈支持,以对抗法国的影响并遏制民主情绪。另一方面是与英国和法国的非正式结盟,这两个国家在1902-1903年和解后成为协约国,并承诺在殖民事务上特别有利。直到第一次世界大战爆发(实际上是在战争爆发后的几个月),尽管德国和英国之间的紧张关系明显加剧,但意大利与这两个联盟都保持着良好的关系。奇怪的是,意大利的多重外交忠诚在当时只是被认为是“互补的”,据说意大利在欧洲大陆(多亏了三国同盟)和地中海(多亏了协约国)获得了安全。1914年7月的危机结束了罗马的外交动荡,并使许多人意识到这种矛盾的政策是多么矛盾和不明智。前意大利驻华盛顿大使里纳尔多•彼得里尼亚尼(Rinaldo Petrignani)在上世纪80年代的一篇文章中,将自由主义意大利摇摆不定的外交政策比作钟摆的轨迹,周期性地从支持法语/英语的政策转向支持德国/奥地利的政策。为了解释这一奇怪的轨迹,彼得里尼亚尼考虑了国际和地缘政治因素,以及国内问题,但最终确定了第三种解释,这与费德里科·夏博德自己的立场相呼应,认为这是亲法和亲德思想的交替,而不是其他任何东西,导致了从一个阵营到另一个阵营的摇摆。战略和国内因素当然很重要,但对于解释意大利摇摆不定的外交政策,思想同样重要,甚至更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Europe, the USA and the ‘policy of the pendulum’: the importance of foreign policy paradigms in the foreign policy of Italy (1989–2005)
At the turn of the 20th century, after a few decades of turbulence, Italian foreign policy oscillated between two poles. On the one hand was the alliance with the rising power of the time, Germany, which Italy signed in 1882 and which had been strongly advocated at home by conservatives to both counter French influence and contain democratic sentiments. On the other was the informal alignment with England and France, the soon-to-be Entente Powers, which materialized after the rapprochement of 1902–1903, and promised to be especially advantageous in colonial matters. Until the breakout of the First World War (and indeed a few months into the war), Italy entertained good relations with both alignments, despite the obvious, mounting tension between Germany and England. Curiously, Italy’s multiple diplomatic allegiances were simply considered ‘complementary’ at the time, with Italy supposedly gaining security on the continent (thanks to the Triple Alliance) and in the Mediterranean (thanks to the Entente). It took the crisis of July 1914 to bring Rome’s diplomatic oscillation to an end, and make many realize how contradictory and ill-advised this ambivalent policy had been. Writing in the 1980s, the former Italian Ambassador to Washington Rinaldo Petrignani compared the wavering, oscillatory behaviour of liberal Italy’s foreign policy to the trajectory of a pendulum, periodically swinging from proFrench/English to pro-German/Austrian policies. To explain this curious trajectory, Petrignani considers international and geopolitical factors, as well as domestic issues, but finally settles for a third explanation which echoes Federico Chabod’s own positions, arguing that it was the alternation of pro-French and proGerman ideas, more than anything else, which accounted for the swinging from one alignment to the other. Strategic and domestic factors were of course important, but ideas were just as much, if not more, to explain Italy’s oscillatory foreign policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1