稳态简单驱动空腔问题配位与交错网格解的比较

J. Batteh, M. M. Chen
{"title":"稳态简单驱动空腔问题配位与交错网格解的比较","authors":"J. Batteh, M. M. Chen","doi":"10.1115/imece1997-0925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents some sample computations that employ three different schemes for the discretization of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: colocated mesh (CM) with basic second order finite difference approximations for the interior nodes, with two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition, and the conventional staggered mesh (SM). The specific goal is to better appreciate the well known spatial oscillation, or “pressure wiggle”, phenomenon usually attributed to the use of colocated mesh. A modified artificial compressibility method (ACM) and the MAC method were used for the colocated and staggered mesh calculations, respectively, but the focus of our findings is on the converged steady state results which pertain more to the asymptotic steady state discretization scheme (i.e. SM or CM) than the pseudo-time iteration method for obtaining these asymptotic solutions. Two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition were employed in conjunction with the ACM: 1) the requirement that the boundary pressure acts so that the continuity equation is satisfied at the boundary or 2) the requirement that the normal pressure gradient on the boundary satisfies the Navier-Stokes equation. Sample 2D and 3D calculations are performed on the driven cavity problem using these three techniques for a Reynolds number of 100. The results of these sample calculations are analyzed based on solutions available in the literature, and a comparison is made between the various methods and boundary condition implementations. The colocated mesh results indicate that the spatial oscillations, when present, were never greater than the overall accuracy, which is judged to be consistent with expected truncation errors of the various methods. The major objections of the oscillations are thus cosmetic rather than substantive. Furthermore, when the normal pressure gradient condition from the Navier-Stokes equation is used in conjunction with a colocated mesh, the spatial oscillations in the computations are significantly reduced for the pressure and are essentially non-existent for the velocities. These results suggest that the colocated mesh, with artificial compressibility or with other methods of computation, is a viable discretization scheme without the use of complex interpolation schemes to simulate a staggered mesh.","PeriodicalId":306962,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison Between Colocated Mesh and Staggered Mesh Solutions for the Steady State Simple Driven Cavity Problem\",\"authors\":\"J. Batteh, M. M. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece1997-0925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents some sample computations that employ three different schemes for the discretization of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: colocated mesh (CM) with basic second order finite difference approximations for the interior nodes, with two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition, and the conventional staggered mesh (SM). The specific goal is to better appreciate the well known spatial oscillation, or “pressure wiggle”, phenomenon usually attributed to the use of colocated mesh. A modified artificial compressibility method (ACM) and the MAC method were used for the colocated and staggered mesh calculations, respectively, but the focus of our findings is on the converged steady state results which pertain more to the asymptotic steady state discretization scheme (i.e. SM or CM) than the pseudo-time iteration method for obtaining these asymptotic solutions. Two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition were employed in conjunction with the ACM: 1) the requirement that the boundary pressure acts so that the continuity equation is satisfied at the boundary or 2) the requirement that the normal pressure gradient on the boundary satisfies the Navier-Stokes equation. Sample 2D and 3D calculations are performed on the driven cavity problem using these three techniques for a Reynolds number of 100. The results of these sample calculations are analyzed based on solutions available in the literature, and a comparison is made between the various methods and boundary condition implementations. The colocated mesh results indicate that the spatial oscillations, when present, were never greater than the overall accuracy, which is judged to be consistent with expected truncation errors of the various methods. The major objections of the oscillations are thus cosmetic rather than substantive. Furthermore, when the normal pressure gradient condition from the Navier-Stokes equation is used in conjunction with a colocated mesh, the spatial oscillations in the computations are significantly reduced for the pressure and are essentially non-existent for the velocities. These results suggest that the colocated mesh, with artificial compressibility or with other methods of computation, is a viable discretization scheme without the use of complex interpolation schemes to simulate a staggered mesh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1997-0925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1997-0925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文给出了用三种不同的格式对不可压缩的Navier-Stokes方程进行离散化的一些实例计算:对内部节点采用基本二阶有限差分近似的配位网格(CM),压力边界条件的两种不同实现,以及传统的交错网格(SM)。具体目标是更好地理解众所周知的空间振荡,或“压力波动”,通常归因于使用配位网格的现象。采用改进的人工压缩性方法(ACM)和MAC方法分别进行了配位和交错网格计算,但我们的研究结果的重点是收敛的稳态结果,这些结果更适合于渐近稳态离散化方案(即SM或CM),而不是伪时间迭代方法来获得这些渐近解。结合ACM,采用了压力边界条件的两种不同实现:1)要求边界压力的作用使边界上的连续性方程得到满足;2)要求边界上的法向压力梯度满足Navier-Stokes方程。在雷诺数为100的情况下,使用这三种技术对驱动腔问题进行了二维和三维计算。基于文献中可用的解,分析了这些示例计算的结果,并对各种方法和边界条件的实现进行了比较。配置网格结果表明,当存在空间振荡时,空间振荡不会大于总体精度,这与各种方法的预期截断误差一致。因此,对振荡的主要反对意见是表面上的,而不是实质性的。此外,当Navier-Stokes方程的标准压力梯度条件与配位网格结合使用时,计算中的空间振荡在压力下显着减少,而在速度下基本上不存在。这些结果表明,使用人工压缩或其他计算方法的并置网格是一种可行的离散化方案,无需使用复杂的插值方案来模拟交错网格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison Between Colocated Mesh and Staggered Mesh Solutions for the Steady State Simple Driven Cavity Problem
This paper presents some sample computations that employ three different schemes for the discretization of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: colocated mesh (CM) with basic second order finite difference approximations for the interior nodes, with two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition, and the conventional staggered mesh (SM). The specific goal is to better appreciate the well known spatial oscillation, or “pressure wiggle”, phenomenon usually attributed to the use of colocated mesh. A modified artificial compressibility method (ACM) and the MAC method were used for the colocated and staggered mesh calculations, respectively, but the focus of our findings is on the converged steady state results which pertain more to the asymptotic steady state discretization scheme (i.e. SM or CM) than the pseudo-time iteration method for obtaining these asymptotic solutions. Two different implementations of the pressure boundary condition were employed in conjunction with the ACM: 1) the requirement that the boundary pressure acts so that the continuity equation is satisfied at the boundary or 2) the requirement that the normal pressure gradient on the boundary satisfies the Navier-Stokes equation. Sample 2D and 3D calculations are performed on the driven cavity problem using these three techniques for a Reynolds number of 100. The results of these sample calculations are analyzed based on solutions available in the literature, and a comparison is made between the various methods and boundary condition implementations. The colocated mesh results indicate that the spatial oscillations, when present, were never greater than the overall accuracy, which is judged to be consistent with expected truncation errors of the various methods. The major objections of the oscillations are thus cosmetic rather than substantive. Furthermore, when the normal pressure gradient condition from the Navier-Stokes equation is used in conjunction with a colocated mesh, the spatial oscillations in the computations are significantly reduced for the pressure and are essentially non-existent for the velocities. These results suggest that the colocated mesh, with artificial compressibility or with other methods of computation, is a viable discretization scheme without the use of complex interpolation schemes to simulate a staggered mesh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heat Transfer Characteristics of Single Droplet Cooling Using a Microscale Heater Array Thermal Modeling for the Consolidation Process of Thermoplastic Composite Filament Winding Parametric Study of the Ablation Characteristics of Absorbing Dielectrics by Short Pulse Laser A Numerical Analysis of Gas Turbine Disks Incorporating Rotating Heat Pipes Neural Network Modeling of Molecular Beam Epitaxy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1