物种特有的生态特征、系统发育和地理特征支撑着北美鸟类种群数量下降的脆弱性

Henry C Stevens, Adam C Smith, Evan R Buechley, Ç. Şekercioğlu, V. Shirey, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, F. L. La Sorte, Douglas Tallamy, Peter P. Marra
{"title":"物种特有的生态特征、系统发育和地理特征支撑着北美鸟类种群数量下降的脆弱性","authors":"Henry C Stevens, Adam C Smith, Evan R Buechley, Ç. Şekercioğlu, V. Shirey, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, F. L. La Sorte, Douglas Tallamy, Peter P. Marra","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Species declines and extinctions characterize the Anthropocene. Determining species vulnerability to decline, and where and how to mitigate threats, are paramount for effective conservation. We hypothesized that species with shared ecological traits also share threats, and therefore may experience similar population trends. Here, we used a Bayesian modeling framework to test whether phylogeny, geography, and 22 ecological traits predict regional population trends for 380 North American bird species. Groups like blackbirds, warblers, and shorebirds, as well as species occupying Bird Conservation Regions at more extreme latitudes in North America, exhibited negative population trends; whereas groups such as ducks, raptors, and waders, as well as species occupying more inland Bird Conservation Regions, exhibited positive trends. Specifically, we found that in addition to phylogeny and breeding geography, multiple ecological traits contributed to explaining variation in regional population trends for North American birds. Furthermore, we found that regional trends and the relative effects of migration distance, phylogeny, and geography differ between shorebirds, songbirds, and waterbirds. Our work provides evidence that multiple ecological traits correlate with North American bird population trends, but that the individual effects of these ecological traits in predicting population trends often vary between different groups of birds. Moreover, our results reinforce the notion that variation in avian population trends is controlled by more than phylogeny and geography, where closely-related species within one region can show unique population trends due to differences in their ecological traits. We recommend that regional conservation plans, i.e. one-size-fits-all plans, be implemented only for bird groups with population trends under strong phylogenetic or geographic controls. We underscore the need to develop species-specific research and management strategies for other groups, like songbirds, that exhibit high variation in their population trends and are influenced by multiple ecological traits.","PeriodicalId":125764,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Applications","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species-specific ecological traits, phylogeny, and geography underpin vulnerability to population declines for North American birds\",\"authors\":\"Henry C Stevens, Adam C Smith, Evan R Buechley, Ç. Şekercioğlu, V. Shirey, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, F. L. La Sorte, Douglas Tallamy, Peter P. Marra\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ornithapp/duad046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Species declines and extinctions characterize the Anthropocene. Determining species vulnerability to decline, and where and how to mitigate threats, are paramount for effective conservation. We hypothesized that species with shared ecological traits also share threats, and therefore may experience similar population trends. Here, we used a Bayesian modeling framework to test whether phylogeny, geography, and 22 ecological traits predict regional population trends for 380 North American bird species. Groups like blackbirds, warblers, and shorebirds, as well as species occupying Bird Conservation Regions at more extreme latitudes in North America, exhibited negative population trends; whereas groups such as ducks, raptors, and waders, as well as species occupying more inland Bird Conservation Regions, exhibited positive trends. Specifically, we found that in addition to phylogeny and breeding geography, multiple ecological traits contributed to explaining variation in regional population trends for North American birds. Furthermore, we found that regional trends and the relative effects of migration distance, phylogeny, and geography differ between shorebirds, songbirds, and waterbirds. Our work provides evidence that multiple ecological traits correlate with North American bird population trends, but that the individual effects of these ecological traits in predicting population trends often vary between different groups of birds. Moreover, our results reinforce the notion that variation in avian population trends is controlled by more than phylogeny and geography, where closely-related species within one region can show unique population trends due to differences in their ecological traits. We recommend that regional conservation plans, i.e. one-size-fits-all plans, be implemented only for bird groups with population trends under strong phylogenetic or geographic controls. We underscore the need to develop species-specific research and management strategies for other groups, like songbirds, that exhibit high variation in their population trends and are influenced by multiple ecological traits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornithological Applications\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornithological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duad046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duad046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

物种减少和灭绝是人类世的特征。确定物种对衰退的脆弱性,以及在何处以及如何减轻威胁,对于有效的保护至关重要。我们假设具有共同生态特征的物种也面临同样的威胁,因此可能会经历类似的种群趋势。本文采用贝叶斯模型框架,对380种北美鸟类的系统发育、地理和22个生态性状是否能预测区域种群趋势进行了研究。黑鸟、莺和滨鸟等种群,以及占据北美更极端纬度鸟类保护区的物种,呈现出负的数量趋势;而鸭子、猛禽和涉禽等种群,以及占据内陆鸟类保护区的物种,则呈现出积极的趋势。具体来说,我们发现除了系统发育和繁殖地理之外,多种生态性状也有助于解释北美鸟类区域种群趋势的变化。此外,我们还发现滨鸟、鸣禽和水鸟在迁徙距离、系统发育和地理方面的区域趋势和相对影响存在差异。我们的工作提供了证据,证明多种生态特征与北美鸟类种群趋势相关,但这些生态特征在预测种群趋势方面的个体效应在不同的鸟类群体之间往往有所不同。此外,我们的研究结果强化了鸟类种群趋势变化不仅仅是由系统发育和地理控制的概念,其中一个地区内近亲物种由于其生态性状的差异而表现出独特的种群趋势。我们建议只对种群趋势受系统发育或地理控制的鸟类实施区域保护计划,即“一刀切”的计划。我们强调有必要为其他类群,如鸣禽,制定特定物种的研究和管理策略,这些类群在种群趋势上表现出高度变化,并受到多种生态性状的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Species-specific ecological traits, phylogeny, and geography underpin vulnerability to population declines for North American birds
Species declines and extinctions characterize the Anthropocene. Determining species vulnerability to decline, and where and how to mitigate threats, are paramount for effective conservation. We hypothesized that species with shared ecological traits also share threats, and therefore may experience similar population trends. Here, we used a Bayesian modeling framework to test whether phylogeny, geography, and 22 ecological traits predict regional population trends for 380 North American bird species. Groups like blackbirds, warblers, and shorebirds, as well as species occupying Bird Conservation Regions at more extreme latitudes in North America, exhibited negative population trends; whereas groups such as ducks, raptors, and waders, as well as species occupying more inland Bird Conservation Regions, exhibited positive trends. Specifically, we found that in addition to phylogeny and breeding geography, multiple ecological traits contributed to explaining variation in regional population trends for North American birds. Furthermore, we found that regional trends and the relative effects of migration distance, phylogeny, and geography differ between shorebirds, songbirds, and waterbirds. Our work provides evidence that multiple ecological traits correlate with North American bird population trends, but that the individual effects of these ecological traits in predicting population trends often vary between different groups of birds. Moreover, our results reinforce the notion that variation in avian population trends is controlled by more than phylogeny and geography, where closely-related species within one region can show unique population trends due to differences in their ecological traits. We recommend that regional conservation plans, i.e. one-size-fits-all plans, be implemented only for bird groups with population trends under strong phylogenetic or geographic controls. We underscore the need to develop species-specific research and management strategies for other groups, like songbirds, that exhibit high variation in their population trends and are influenced by multiple ecological traits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally The Amazon Basin’s rivers and lakes support Nearctic-breeding shorebirds during southward migration Two listeners detect slightly more birds than a single listener when interpreting acoustic recordings Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1