批判性思维及其评估:以希腊和塞浦路斯为特别参考文献综述

Giorgos K. Fountzoulas, M. Koutsouba, Evgenia Nikolaki
{"title":"批判性思维及其评估:以希腊和塞浦路斯为特别参考文献综述","authors":"Giorgos K. Fountzoulas, M. Koutsouba, Evgenia Nikolaki","doi":"10.30845/jesp.v6n2p9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking as a cognitive process refers to the critical thinking skills of a conscious person who explores a situation or a problem from different perspectives. In order to measure this cognitive process and skills many tools have been established. However, the accurate assessment of critical thinking skills depends on the instruments’ properties being invariant or similar across cultural, ageing and other groups. For this reason, qualitative and quantitative assessments methods have been proposed and used. The aim of this study is to explore the concept of critical thinking and to present the critical thinking assessment tools used worldwide with special reference in Greece and Cyprus. For this purpose, literature-based research methodology was adopted that included analysis and evaluation of relevant published literature. The literature review showed that though many tools have been introduced for measuring critical thinking skills only thirteen of them have undergone the processes of validity and credibility procedures worldwide. Moreover, these thirteen tools include both qualitative and quantitative research methods, with qualitative ones to prevail. Finally, in Greece and Cyprus, the research of critical thinking and the assessment of critical thinking skills is a new established field and only few researches have been conducted using structured tools.","PeriodicalId":170810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Thinking and Its Assessment: A Literature Review with Special Reference in Greece and Cyprus\",\"authors\":\"Giorgos K. Fountzoulas, M. Koutsouba, Evgenia Nikolaki\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/jesp.v6n2p9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical thinking as a cognitive process refers to the critical thinking skills of a conscious person who explores a situation or a problem from different perspectives. In order to measure this cognitive process and skills many tools have been established. However, the accurate assessment of critical thinking skills depends on the instruments’ properties being invariant or similar across cultural, ageing and other groups. For this reason, qualitative and quantitative assessments methods have been proposed and used. The aim of this study is to explore the concept of critical thinking and to present the critical thinking assessment tools used worldwide with special reference in Greece and Cyprus. For this purpose, literature-based research methodology was adopted that included analysis and evaluation of relevant published literature. The literature review showed that though many tools have been introduced for measuring critical thinking skills only thirteen of them have undergone the processes of validity and credibility procedures worldwide. Moreover, these thirteen tools include both qualitative and quantitative research methods, with qualitative ones to prevail. Finally, in Greece and Cyprus, the research of critical thinking and the assessment of critical thinking skills is a new established field and only few researches have been conducted using structured tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"241 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n2p9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n2p9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

批判性思维作为一种认知过程,是指有意识的人从不同的角度对一个情况或问题进行探索的批判性思维能力。为了测量这种认知过程和技能,已经建立了许多工具。然而,对批判性思维技能的准确评估取决于工具的属性在不同文化、年龄和其他群体中是不变的或相似的。为此,提出并使用了定性和定量评价方法。本研究的目的是探讨批判性思维的概念,并提出批判性思维评估工具在世界范围内使用,特别参考在希腊和塞浦路斯。为此,我们采用文献为基础的研究方法,对相关已发表的文献进行分析和评价。文献综述表明,虽然已经引入了许多衡量批判性思维技能的工具,但其中只有13个在全球范围内经历了有效性和可信度程序的过程。此外,这13种工具包括定性和定量研究方法,以定性研究方法为主。最后,在希腊和塞浦路斯,批判性思维的研究和批判性思维技能的评估是一个新建立的领域,只有很少的研究使用结构化工具进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Thinking and Its Assessment: A Literature Review with Special Reference in Greece and Cyprus
Critical thinking as a cognitive process refers to the critical thinking skills of a conscious person who explores a situation or a problem from different perspectives. In order to measure this cognitive process and skills many tools have been established. However, the accurate assessment of critical thinking skills depends on the instruments’ properties being invariant or similar across cultural, ageing and other groups. For this reason, qualitative and quantitative assessments methods have been proposed and used. The aim of this study is to explore the concept of critical thinking and to present the critical thinking assessment tools used worldwide with special reference in Greece and Cyprus. For this purpose, literature-based research methodology was adopted that included analysis and evaluation of relevant published literature. The literature review showed that though many tools have been introduced for measuring critical thinking skills only thirteen of them have undergone the processes of validity and credibility procedures worldwide. Moreover, these thirteen tools include both qualitative and quantitative research methods, with qualitative ones to prevail. Finally, in Greece and Cyprus, the research of critical thinking and the assessment of critical thinking skills is a new established field and only few researches have been conducted using structured tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From RAE to REF: Trust and Atmosphere in UK Higher Education Reform Religious Education of Lifelong Learning in Taiwan Weixin Shengjiao I Ching University The Manifestation of Alienation in Sylvia Plath’s the Bell Jar Female Technology Leaders Overcome Barriers to Climb the US Industry Ladder Debunking Hattie: Evaluating the Contribution of Academic Studies to Policy Development and Implementation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1