几种简化rls型算法的比较研究

J. H. Husøy, M. Abadi
{"title":"几种简化rls型算法的比较研究","authors":"J. H. Husøy, M. Abadi","doi":"10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm has established itself as the \"ultimate\" adaptive filtering algorithm in the sense that it is the adaptive filter exhibiting the best convergence behavior. Unfortunately, practical implementations of the algorithm are often associated with high computational complexity and/or poor numerical properties. Rather than focusing on full RLS algorithm implementations aiming directly at remedying these problems, we argue that the use of simplified or partial RLS algorithms may be a viable alternative to full RLS. In particular, we point out that two recently introduced algorithms, fast Euclidian direction search (FEDS) and recursive adaptive matching pursuit (RAMP) can indeed be interpreted as such partial RLS algorithms exhibiting a nice tradeoff between complexity and performance. We support our presentation by a comprehensive set of simulation results.","PeriodicalId":146713,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of some simplified RLS-type algorithms\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Husøy, M. Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm has established itself as the \\\"ultimate\\\" adaptive filtering algorithm in the sense that it is the adaptive filter exhibiting the best convergence behavior. Unfortunately, practical implementations of the algorithm are often associated with high computational complexity and/or poor numerical properties. Rather than focusing on full RLS algorithm implementations aiming directly at remedying these problems, we argue that the use of simplified or partial RLS algorithms may be a viable alternative to full RLS. In particular, we point out that two recently introduced algorithms, fast Euclidian direction search (FEDS) and recursive adaptive matching pursuit (RAMP) can indeed be interpreted as such partial RLS algorithms exhibiting a nice tradeoff between complexity and performance. We support our presentation by a comprehensive set of simulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCCSP.2004.1296509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

递归最小二乘(RLS)算法已成为“终极”自适应滤波算法,因为它是具有最佳收敛性能的自适应滤波算法。不幸的是,该算法的实际实现通常与高计算复杂度和/或较差的数值特性相关联。而不是专注于完整的RLS算法实现,旨在直接纠正这些问题,我们认为,使用简化或部分RLS算法可能是一个可行的替代完全RLS。我们特别指出,最近引入的两种算法,快速欧几里得方向搜索(fed)和递归自适应匹配追踪(RAMP)确实可以被解释为在复杂性和性能之间表现出良好权衡的部分RLS算法。我们通过一组全面的仿真结果来支持我们的演示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of some simplified RLS-type algorithms
The recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm has established itself as the "ultimate" adaptive filtering algorithm in the sense that it is the adaptive filter exhibiting the best convergence behavior. Unfortunately, practical implementations of the algorithm are often associated with high computational complexity and/or poor numerical properties. Rather than focusing on full RLS algorithm implementations aiming directly at remedying these problems, we argue that the use of simplified or partial RLS algorithms may be a viable alternative to full RLS. In particular, we point out that two recently introduced algorithms, fast Euclidian direction search (FEDS) and recursive adaptive matching pursuit (RAMP) can indeed be interpreted as such partial RLS algorithms exhibiting a nice tradeoff between complexity and performance. We support our presentation by a comprehensive set of simulation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complexity reduction of high-speed FIR filters using micro-genetic algorithm PAPR analysis and reduction in WPDM systems On cross-layer adaptivity and optimization for multimedia CDMA mobile wireless networks Absolute effects of aggregation of self-similar traffic on quality of service parameters Scanned maps processing using wavelet domain hidden Markov models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1