心率检测:分数方法和经验模式分解

Ljubica Cimeša, Nenad Popovic, N. Miljković, T. Šekara
{"title":"心率检测:分数方法和经验模式分解","authors":"Ljubica Cimeša, Nenad Popovic, N. Miljković, T. Šekara","doi":"10.1109/TELFOR.2017.8249358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparison of two methods used to separate electrocardiography and electromyography signals: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Fractional Order Calculus (FC) is presented. For quantitative evaluation, crest factor (CF) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values were calculated, where higher CF and SNR values were preferable. Results suggest that FC and EMD performance can be partially assessed by CF indicating better artifact cancellation with EMD approach by 9.72%. For FC and EMD, automatic fractional order application and intrinsic mode function selection were suggested and discussed, respectively. In summary, the results suggested that proposed filtering assessment should be enhanced for more appropriate FC and EMD method's assessment.","PeriodicalId":422501,"journal":{"name":"2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate detection: Fractional approach and empirical mode decomposition\",\"authors\":\"Ljubica Cimeša, Nenad Popovic, N. Miljković, T. Šekara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TELFOR.2017.8249358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The comparison of two methods used to separate electrocardiography and electromyography signals: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Fractional Order Calculus (FC) is presented. For quantitative evaluation, crest factor (CF) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values were calculated, where higher CF and SNR values were preferable. Results suggest that FC and EMD performance can be partially assessed by CF indicating better artifact cancellation with EMD approach by 9.72%. For FC and EMD, automatic fractional order application and intrinsic mode function selection were suggested and discussed, respectively. In summary, the results suggested that proposed filtering assessment should be enhanced for more appropriate FC and EMD method's assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR.2017.8249358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 25th Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR.2017.8249358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

比较了两种用于分离心电图和肌电信号的方法:经验模式分解(EMD)和分数阶微积分(FC)。为了进行定量评价,计算波峰因子(CF)和信噪比(SNR)值,CF和SNR值越高越好。结果表明,CF可以部分评估FC和EMD的性能,表明使用EMD方法可以更好地消除9.72%的伪影。对于FC和EMD,分别提出和讨论了分数阶的自动应用和内模函数的选择。综上所述,建议加强建议的过滤评价,以获得更合适的FC和EMD方法评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart rate detection: Fractional approach and empirical mode decomposition
The comparison of two methods used to separate electrocardiography and electromyography signals: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Fractional Order Calculus (FC) is presented. For quantitative evaluation, crest factor (CF) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values were calculated, where higher CF and SNR values were preferable. Results suggest that FC and EMD performance can be partially assessed by CF indicating better artifact cancellation with EMD approach by 9.72%. For FC and EMD, automatic fractional order application and intrinsic mode function selection were suggested and discussed, respectively. In summary, the results suggested that proposed filtering assessment should be enhanced for more appropriate FC and EMD method's assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposing bat inspired heuristic algorithm for the optimization of GMPLS networks Investigation on temporal skewing among O-CDMA code carriers under fiber temperature variations Survey on machine learning algorithms as cloud service for CIDPS Identity provider deployment based on container technology Enhanced bandwidth PIFA antennas for 900/1800 MHz and WiFi 2400 MHz band with a dielectric cover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1