对网络结构、度量和驱动节点数量的洞察

Abida Sadaf, Luke Mathieson, Katarzyna Musial
{"title":"对网络结构、度量和驱动节点数量的洞察","authors":"Abida Sadaf, Luke Mathieson, Katarzyna Musial","doi":"10.1145/3487351.3488557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Control of complex networks is one of the most challenging open problems within network science. One view says that we can only claim to fully understand a network if we have the ability to influence or control it and predict the results of the employed control mechanisms. The area of control and controllability has progressed notably in the past ten years with several frameworks proposed namely, structural, exact, and physical. With continuing advancement in the area, the need to develop effective and efficient control methods that provide robust control is increasingly critical. The ultimate responsibility for controlling the network lies with the set of driver nodes that, according to the classical definition of the control theory of complex systems, can steer the network from any given state to a desired final state. To be able to develop better control mechanisms, we need to understand the relationship between different network structures and the number of driver nodes needed to control a given structure. This will allow understanding of which networks might be easier to control and the resources needed to control them. In this paper, we present a systematic study that builds an understanding of how network profiles (random (R), small-world (SW), scale-free (SF)) influence the number of driver nodes needed for control. Additionally, we also consider real social networks and identify their driver nodes set to further expand the discussion. We mean to find a correlation between network structure measures and number of driver nodes. Our results show that there is in fact a strong relationship between these.","PeriodicalId":320904,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining","volume":"402 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An insight into network structure measures and number of driver nodes\",\"authors\":\"Abida Sadaf, Luke Mathieson, Katarzyna Musial\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3487351.3488557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Control of complex networks is one of the most challenging open problems within network science. One view says that we can only claim to fully understand a network if we have the ability to influence or control it and predict the results of the employed control mechanisms. The area of control and controllability has progressed notably in the past ten years with several frameworks proposed namely, structural, exact, and physical. With continuing advancement in the area, the need to develop effective and efficient control methods that provide robust control is increasingly critical. The ultimate responsibility for controlling the network lies with the set of driver nodes that, according to the classical definition of the control theory of complex systems, can steer the network from any given state to a desired final state. To be able to develop better control mechanisms, we need to understand the relationship between different network structures and the number of driver nodes needed to control a given structure. This will allow understanding of which networks might be easier to control and the resources needed to control them. In this paper, we present a systematic study that builds an understanding of how network profiles (random (R), small-world (SW), scale-free (SF)) influence the number of driver nodes needed for control. Additionally, we also consider real social networks and identify their driver nodes set to further expand the discussion. We mean to find a correlation between network structure measures and number of driver nodes. Our results show that there is in fact a strong relationship between these.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining\",\"volume\":\"402 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3487351.3488557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3487351.3488557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

复杂网络的控制是网络科学中最具挑战性的开放性问题之一。一种观点认为,只有当我们有能力影响或控制一个网络,并预测所采用的控制机制的结果时,我们才能声称完全理解这个网络。控制和可控性领域在过去十年中取得了显著进展,提出了几个框架,即结构框架、精确框架和物理框架。随着该领域的不断发展,开发有效和高效的控制方法以提供鲁棒控制的需求变得越来越重要。控制网络的最终责任在于一组驱动节点,根据复杂系统控制理论的经典定义,这些节点可以将网络从任何给定状态引导到期望的最终状态。为了能够开发更好的控制机制,我们需要了解不同网络结构和控制给定结构所需的驱动节点数量之间的关系。这将有助于了解哪些网络可能更容易控制,以及控制它们所需的资源。在本文中,我们提出了一个系统的研究,该研究建立了对网络概况(随机(R),小世界(SW),无标度(SF))如何影响控制所需驱动节点数量的理解。此外,我们还考虑了真实的社交网络,并确定了其驱动节点集,以进一步扩大讨论。我们的目的是找出网络结构措施与驱动节点数量之间的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,事实上,这两者之间存在着很强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An insight into network structure measures and number of driver nodes
Control of complex networks is one of the most challenging open problems within network science. One view says that we can only claim to fully understand a network if we have the ability to influence or control it and predict the results of the employed control mechanisms. The area of control and controllability has progressed notably in the past ten years with several frameworks proposed namely, structural, exact, and physical. With continuing advancement in the area, the need to develop effective and efficient control methods that provide robust control is increasingly critical. The ultimate responsibility for controlling the network lies with the set of driver nodes that, according to the classical definition of the control theory of complex systems, can steer the network from any given state to a desired final state. To be able to develop better control mechanisms, we need to understand the relationship between different network structures and the number of driver nodes needed to control a given structure. This will allow understanding of which networks might be easier to control and the resources needed to control them. In this paper, we present a systematic study that builds an understanding of how network profiles (random (R), small-world (SW), scale-free (SF)) influence the number of driver nodes needed for control. Additionally, we also consider real social networks and identify their driver nodes set to further expand the discussion. We mean to find a correlation between network structure measures and number of driver nodes. Our results show that there is in fact a strong relationship between these.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting COVID-19 with AI techniques: current research and future directions Predictions of drug metabolism pathways through CYP 3A4 enzyme by analysing drug-target interactions network graph An insight into network structure measures and number of driver nodes Temporal dynamics of posts and user engagement of influencers on Facebook and Instagram Vibe check: social resonance learning for enhanced recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1