White & Gunstone模型对不同学习风格初中三年级学生未来思维和科学思维倾向发展的影响

Naif Alsufyani
{"title":"White & Gunstone模型对不同学习风格初中三年级学生未来思维和科学思维倾向发展的影响","authors":"Naif Alsufyani","doi":"10.54940/ep59124359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to reveal the effect of White and Gunstone model (PEOE) on developing future thinking and thinking dispositions in science among third-grade intermediate students with different learning styles. To achieve this goal, the experimental approach was used. The study sample consisted of (60) students from the third intermediate grade, who were randomly distributed to an experimental group consisting of (30) students and a control group consisting of (30) students. The tools used in this study included the future thinking test, the thinking dispositions scale, and the learning styles scale. The results revealed that There was a statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) between the mean scores of the students of the experimental and control groups in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale, in favor of the experimental group. There was no statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) for the students of the experimental group in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale attributed to the educational style variable. There was a statistically significant correlation between the total score of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale in the post measurement of the students of the experimental group and the control group. Considering the results of this study, several recommendations and suggestions were mentioned that may contribute to improving aspects of science education.","PeriodicalId":402392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of White and Gunstone model (PEOE) on developing future thinking and thinking dispositions in science among third-grade intermediate students with different learning styles\",\"authors\":\"Naif Alsufyani\",\"doi\":\"10.54940/ep59124359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to reveal the effect of White and Gunstone model (PEOE) on developing future thinking and thinking dispositions in science among third-grade intermediate students with different learning styles. To achieve this goal, the experimental approach was used. The study sample consisted of (60) students from the third intermediate grade, who were randomly distributed to an experimental group consisting of (30) students and a control group consisting of (30) students. The tools used in this study included the future thinking test, the thinking dispositions scale, and the learning styles scale. The results revealed that There was a statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) between the mean scores of the students of the experimental and control groups in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale, in favor of the experimental group. There was no statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) for the students of the experimental group in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale attributed to the educational style variable. There was a statistically significant correlation between the total score of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale in the post measurement of the students of the experimental group and the control group. Considering the results of this study, several recommendations and suggestions were mentioned that may contribute to improving aspects of science education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep59124359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep59124359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在揭示不同学习风格的初中三年级学生的White & Gunstone模型(pee)对未来思维和科学思维倾向的影响。为了达到这个目的,我们采用了实验的方法。研究样本为60名初三学生,随机分为实验组(30名)和对照组(30名)。本研究使用的工具包括未来思维测试、思维倾向量表和学习风格量表。结果显示,实验组学生在未来思维测试和思维倾向量表的后测中得分与对照组学生的平均得分在水平(0.05)上有统计学差异,实验组学生优势明显。实验组学生在未来思维测试和教育风格变量思维倾向量表的后测中,差异无统计学意义(0.05)。实验组和对照组学生未来思维测试总分与后测思维倾向量表总分之间存在显著的统计学相关性。考虑到这项研究的结果,提出了一些建议和建议,可能有助于改善科学教育的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of White and Gunstone model (PEOE) on developing future thinking and thinking dispositions in science among third-grade intermediate students with different learning styles
This study aimed to reveal the effect of White and Gunstone model (PEOE) on developing future thinking and thinking dispositions in science among third-grade intermediate students with different learning styles. To achieve this goal, the experimental approach was used. The study sample consisted of (60) students from the third intermediate grade, who were randomly distributed to an experimental group consisting of (30) students and a control group consisting of (30) students. The tools used in this study included the future thinking test, the thinking dispositions scale, and the learning styles scale. The results revealed that There was a statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) between the mean scores of the students of the experimental and control groups in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale, in favor of the experimental group. There was no statistically significant difference at the level (0,05) for the students of the experimental group in the post measurement of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale attributed to the educational style variable. There was a statistically significant correlation between the total score of the future thinking test and the thinking dispositions scale in the post measurement of the students of the experimental group and the control group. Considering the results of this study, several recommendations and suggestions were mentioned that may contribute to improving aspects of science education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Predictive Capacity of Academic Life Quality in Academic Identity Among Female Students at Umm Al-Qura University Organizational memory is an approach to achieving institutional excellence in Saudi universities in light of the experience of the United States of America (Proposed concept) Self-disclosure and its relationship to psychological immunity among non-Arabic-speaking students at Umm Al-Qura University in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Content Analysis of Saudi third intermediate Science textbook in the light of sustainable development dimensions The CEFR in a Saudi Classroom: Implications for Academic Labor in Language Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1