{"title":"牵引用三电平和二电平逆变变磁通电机驱动器的比较","authors":"L. Masisi","doi":"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two electric drives, a two and three level neutral point clamped variable flux machine drive. The variable flux machine uses Aluminium Nickel Metal Cobalt (AlNiCo) Permanent Magnets (PMs) which have a lower coercive force. The PMs can thus be demagnetized and remagnetized on the fly by the use of a current pulse. The three level inverter is used due to a requirement for high performance in traction applications. Due to the complexity of the three level inverter as compared to the two level inverter and the nature of the variable flux machine, this paper conducts a comparative simulation study between the two inverters particularly during de-magnetization effects. The simulation studies were conducted at two switching frequencies, 10kHz and 20kHz respectively. Parameters of concern were the Neutral Point (NP) voltage ripple, torque ripple and the d-axis current ripple. An already existing modulation strategy for balancing the two dc bus capacitors on the three level inverter is used. Overall the three level inverter produced a NP voltage ripple of below 0.5% of the dc bus voltage even during de-magnetization stage. The three level inverter produced the lowest torque ripple of less than 7 % at a switching frequency of 20kHz. The two level inverter drive had a d-axis current ripple of more than 200% as compared to the three level inverter drive. This means that a three level inverter promises a lower iron loss contribution in the VFM.","PeriodicalId":344332,"journal":{"name":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between A Three and Two Level Inverter Variable Flux Machine Drives For Traction Applications\",\"authors\":\"L. Masisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two electric drives, a two and three level neutral point clamped variable flux machine drive. The variable flux machine uses Aluminium Nickel Metal Cobalt (AlNiCo) Permanent Magnets (PMs) which have a lower coercive force. The PMs can thus be demagnetized and remagnetized on the fly by the use of a current pulse. The three level inverter is used due to a requirement for high performance in traction applications. Due to the complexity of the three level inverter as compared to the two level inverter and the nature of the variable flux machine, this paper conducts a comparative simulation study between the two inverters particularly during de-magnetization effects. The simulation studies were conducted at two switching frequencies, 10kHz and 20kHz respectively. Parameters of concern were the Neutral Point (NP) voltage ripple, torque ripple and the d-axis current ripple. An already existing modulation strategy for balancing the two dc bus capacitors on the three level inverter is used. Overall the three level inverter produced a NP voltage ripple of below 0.5% of the dc bus voltage even during de-magnetization stage. The three level inverter produced the lowest torque ripple of less than 7 % at a switching frequency of 20kHz. The two level inverter drive had a d-axis current ripple of more than 200% as compared to the three level inverter drive. This means that a three level inverter promises a lower iron loss contribution in the VFM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了两种电驱动,即二、三级中性点夹紧可变磁通机驱动。可变磁通机使用具有较低矫顽力的铝镍金属钴(AlNiCo)永磁(pm)。因此,pm可以通过使用电流脉冲在飞行中退磁和再磁化。由于牵引应用对高性能的要求,使用了三电平逆变器。由于三电平逆变器相对于两电平逆变器的复杂性和变磁通电机的性质,本文对两种逆变器进行了对比仿真研究,特别是在去磁效果方面。仿真研究分别在10kHz和20kHz两个开关频率下进行。关注的参数是中性点(NP)电压纹波、转矩纹波和d轴电流纹波。在三电平逆变器上采用了一种现有的调制策略来平衡两个直流母线电容。总体而言,即使在去磁阶段,三电平逆变器产生的NP电压纹波也低于直流母线电压的0.5%。在开关频率为20kHz时,三电平逆变器产生的最低转矩纹波小于7%。与三电平逆变器驱动相比,两电平逆变器驱动的d轴电流纹波大于200%。这意味着三电平逆变器在VFM中具有较低的铁损耗贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison Between A Three and Two Level Inverter Variable Flux Machine Drives For Traction Applications
This paper compares two electric drives, a two and three level neutral point clamped variable flux machine drive. The variable flux machine uses Aluminium Nickel Metal Cobalt (AlNiCo) Permanent Magnets (PMs) which have a lower coercive force. The PMs can thus be demagnetized and remagnetized on the fly by the use of a current pulse. The three level inverter is used due to a requirement for high performance in traction applications. Due to the complexity of the three level inverter as compared to the two level inverter and the nature of the variable flux machine, this paper conducts a comparative simulation study between the two inverters particularly during de-magnetization effects. The simulation studies were conducted at two switching frequencies, 10kHz and 20kHz respectively. Parameters of concern were the Neutral Point (NP) voltage ripple, torque ripple and the d-axis current ripple. An already existing modulation strategy for balancing the two dc bus capacitors on the three level inverter is used. Overall the three level inverter produced a NP voltage ripple of below 0.5% of the dc bus voltage even during de-magnetization stage. The three level inverter produced the lowest torque ripple of less than 7 % at a switching frequency of 20kHz. The two level inverter drive had a d-axis current ripple of more than 200% as compared to the three level inverter drive. This means that a three level inverter promises a lower iron loss contribution in the VFM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Distributed Framework for Programming the Artificial Intelligence of Mobile Robots in Smart Manufacturing Systems Multi-Class Weather Classification from Still Image Using Said Ensemble Method Three-Phase Five-Limb Transformer Harmonic Analysis under DC-bias Modelling of a MMC HVDC Link between Koeberg Power Station and Cape Town - Experiences in simulation Comparison Between A Three and Two Level Inverter Variable Flux Machine Drives For Traction Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1