IEEE 802.15.6和IEEE 802.15.4物理层误码率性能比较

2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) Pub Date : 2016-06-27 DOI:10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839

Hakan Erdol, Hasan Yavuz Ozderya, Cem Sisman, T. Kayikçioglu, I. Kaya

{"title":"IEEE 802.15.6和IEEE 802.15.4物理层误码率性能比较","authors":"Hakan Erdol, Hasan Yavuz Ozderya, Cem Sisman, T. Kayikçioglu, I. Kaya","doi":"10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, Two communication protocol, IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE, which are designed for telemedicine field, have been studied. BER performances values of both standards are simulated using their individual physical layer profiles in Rayleigh fading and Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channels. The obtained performances are compared with each other. As a result of simulation in AWGN Channel, IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol performs approximately 7 dB better in SNR - BER graph than IEEE 802.15.6 while in Rayleigh channel this difference increased up to 16 dB.","PeriodicalId":159773,"journal":{"name":"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BER performance comparison of IEEE 802.15.6 and IEEE 802.15.4 on PHY layer\",\"authors\":\"Hakan Erdol, Hasan Yavuz Ozderya, Cem Sisman, T. Kayikçioglu, I. Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, Two communication protocol, IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE, which are designed for telemedicine field, have been studied. BER performances values of both standards are simulated using their individual physical layer profiles in Rayleigh fading and Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channels. The obtained performances are compared with each other. As a result of simulation in AWGN Channel, IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol performs approximately 7 dB better in SNR - BER graph than IEEE 802.15.6 while in Rayleigh channel this difference increased up to 16 dB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

本文对专为远程医疗领域设计的IEEE 802.15.6无线体域网络(WBAN)和IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE两种通信协议进行了研究。在瑞利衰落和加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)信道中，利用各自的物理层剖面模拟了两种标准的误码率性能值。对得到的性能进行了比较。在AWGN信道下的仿真结果表明，IEEE 802.15.4通信协议在信噪比-误码率图上的性能比IEEE 802.15.6提高了约7 dB，而在瑞利信道下，这一差异增加到16 dB。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

BER performance comparison of IEEE 802.15.6 and IEEE 802.15.4 on PHY layer

In this paper, Two communication protocol, IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE, which are designed for telemedicine field, have been studied. BER performances values of both standards are simulated using their individual physical layer profiles in Rayleigh fading and Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channels. The obtained performances are compared with each other. As a result of simulation in AWGN Channel, IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol performs approximately 7 dB better in SNR - BER graph than IEEE 802.15.6 while in Rayleigh channel this difference increased up to 16 dB.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)

自引率

0.00%

发文量