纠错码实现的可靠性[IC可靠性评估]

M. Shooman
{"title":"纠错码实现的可靠性[IC可靠性评估]","authors":"M. Shooman","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops the probability of error expressions for parity bit codes and a single error correcting-single error detecting code, SECSED. A typical coding and decoding circuit involving standard ICs is developed for a parity bit code and a SECSED code. An expression was developed for the probability of undetected errors based on multiple bit errors or coder chip failure. Under certain conditions of bit transmission rate, B, and bit error probability, q, the simpler parity bit coding scheme is superior to the more complex Hamming code scheme. The general conclusion is that for more complex error detection schemes, one should evaluate the effects of generator and checker failures, since these may be of considerable importance for small values of q.","PeriodicalId":393833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability of error correcting code implementations [IC reliability assessment]\",\"authors\":\"M. Shooman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops the probability of error expressions for parity bit codes and a single error correcting-single error detecting code, SECSED. A typical coding and decoding circuit involving standard ICs is developed for a parity bit code and a SECSED code. An expression was developed for the probability of undetected errors based on multiple bit errors or coder chip failure. Under certain conditions of bit transmission rate, B, and bit error probability, q, the simpler parity bit coding scheme is superior to the more complex Hamming code scheme. The general conclusion is that for more complex error detection schemes, one should evaluate the effects of generator and checker failures, since these may be of considerable importance for small values of q.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文发展了奇偶位码和单纠错单检错码SECSED的错误概率表达式。针对奇偶位码和SECSED码,设计了一种典型的编码和解码电路。建立了基于多比特错误或编码器芯片故障的未检测错误概率表达式。在一定的比特传输率B和误码概率q的条件下,简单的奇偶位编码方案优于复杂的汉明码方案。总的结论是,对于更复杂的错误检测方案,应该评估生成器和检查器故障的影响,因为这些对于q的小值可能相当重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The reliability of error correcting code implementations [IC reliability assessment]
This paper develops the probability of error expressions for parity bit codes and a single error correcting-single error detecting code, SECSED. A typical coding and decoding circuit involving standard ICs is developed for a parity bit code and a SECSED code. An expression was developed for the probability of undetected errors based on multiple bit errors or coder chip failure. Under certain conditions of bit transmission rate, B, and bit error probability, q, the simpler parity bit coding scheme is superior to the more complex Hamming code scheme. The general conclusion is that for more complex error detection schemes, one should evaluate the effects of generator and checker failures, since these may be of considerable importance for small values of q.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a fault isolation procedure [space station reliability] The reliability of error correcting code implementations [IC reliability assessment] Commercial-off-the shelf (COTS): a challenge to military equipment reliability A combined analysis approach to assessing requirements for safety critical real-time control systems Fault tree analysis and binary decision diagrams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1