{"title":"中美跨文化交际障碍研究——以美国媒体中国报道为例","authors":"Y. Lai","doi":"10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, China and some Western countries have been in constant conflict, especially with the United States, which mainly reflected in the news reports by the American media on China. In the final analysis, these conflicts stem from the intercultural communication barriers between China and the United States. Based on the framework of intercultural communication barriers proposed by Martin and Nakayama (2014), this paper analyzes the intercultural communication barriers reflected in American media coverage on China and their impacts by using qualitative research methods and theories of individualism and collectivism. The study found that there are four types of intercultural communication barriers in the American media coverage on China. In terms of ethnocentrism, American media news reports mostly criticize China and praise their own country. In terms of stereotypes, most of the American media news reports are very aggressive in language, and there is no reliable evidence to support the argument. In terms of prejudice, American news media usually do not have a thorough understanding of specific groups in China, and question the professionalism or authenticity of those groups based on their own feelings. In terms of discrimination, news stories in the U.S. media often use abusive words in headlines or text. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions to effectively eliminate these barriers.","PeriodicalId":272668,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","volume":"75 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Intercultural Communication Barriers between China and the United States: The Case of American Media Reports on China\",\"authors\":\"Y. Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For many years, China and some Western countries have been in constant conflict, especially with the United States, which mainly reflected in the news reports by the American media on China. In the final analysis, these conflicts stem from the intercultural communication barriers between China and the United States. Based on the framework of intercultural communication barriers proposed by Martin and Nakayama (2014), this paper analyzes the intercultural communication barriers reflected in American media coverage on China and their impacts by using qualitative research methods and theories of individualism and collectivism. The study found that there are four types of intercultural communication barriers in the American media coverage on China. In terms of ethnocentrism, American media news reports mostly criticize China and praise their own country. In terms of stereotypes, most of the American media news reports are very aggressive in language, and there is no reliable evidence to support the argument. In terms of prejudice, American news media usually do not have a thorough understanding of specific groups in China, and question the professionalism or authenticity of those groups based on their own feelings. In terms of discrimination, news stories in the U.S. media often use abusive words in headlines or text. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions to effectively eliminate these barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"75 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2021.040710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多年来,中国与一些西方国家,特别是与美国的冲突不断,这主要体现在美国媒体对中国的新闻报道上。这些冲突归根到底源于中美两国的跨文化交际障碍。本文以Martin and Nakayama(2014)提出的跨文化交际障碍框架为基础,运用定性研究方法和个人主义与集体主义理论,分析了美国媒体在中国报道中所体现的跨文化交际障碍及其影响。研究发现,在美国媒体对中国的报道中存在四种类型的跨文化交际障碍。在种族中心主义方面,美国媒体的新闻报道大多是批评中国,赞扬自己的国家。在刻板印象方面,大多数美国媒体的新闻报道在语言上是非常激进的,并且没有可靠的证据来支持这种观点。在偏见方面,美国新闻媒体通常对中国的特定群体没有透彻的了解,并根据自己的感受来质疑这些群体的专业性或真实性。在歧视方面,美国媒体的新闻报道经常在标题或正文中使用侮辱性的词语。最后,本文提出了有效消除这些障碍的建议。
A Study of Intercultural Communication Barriers between China and the United States: The Case of American Media Reports on China
For many years, China and some Western countries have been in constant conflict, especially with the United States, which mainly reflected in the news reports by the American media on China. In the final analysis, these conflicts stem from the intercultural communication barriers between China and the United States. Based on the framework of intercultural communication barriers proposed by Martin and Nakayama (2014), this paper analyzes the intercultural communication barriers reflected in American media coverage on China and their impacts by using qualitative research methods and theories of individualism and collectivism. The study found that there are four types of intercultural communication barriers in the American media coverage on China. In terms of ethnocentrism, American media news reports mostly criticize China and praise their own country. In terms of stereotypes, most of the American media news reports are very aggressive in language, and there is no reliable evidence to support the argument. In terms of prejudice, American news media usually do not have a thorough understanding of specific groups in China, and question the professionalism or authenticity of those groups based on their own feelings. In terms of discrimination, news stories in the U.S. media often use abusive words in headlines or text. Finally, this paper puts forward some suggestions to effectively eliminate these barriers.