基于探究性水平的阿利亚伊斯兰学校物理学习教师探究性学习问题概况

Intan Mustika Noor Sasono Putri, Sarwanto, Sukarmin
{"title":"基于探究性水平的阿利亚伊斯兰学校物理学习教师探究性学习问题概况","authors":"Intan Mustika Noor Sasono Putri, Sarwanto, Sukarmin","doi":"10.1063/1.5139823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab, 40% Pure hypothetical inquiry, and 30% applied hypothetical inquiry. It indicated that some teachers have not understood the level of inquiry and find some constraints with the development of inquiry-based set. Teachers needed reference and facilitation activity in developing learning set based on level of inquiry, so that in the future inquiry activity can run chronologically corresponding to the level of inquiry.This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab,...","PeriodicalId":246056,"journal":{"name":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The profile of teachers’ problem related to inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry in physics learning in Madrasah Aliyah (MAN)\",\"authors\":\"Intan Mustika Noor Sasono Putri, Sarwanto, Sukarmin\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.5139823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab, 40% Pure hypothetical inquiry, and 30% applied hypothetical inquiry. It indicated that some teachers have not understood the level of inquiry and find some constraints with the development of inquiry-based set. Teachers needed reference and facilitation activity in developing learning set based on level of inquiry, so that in the future inquiry activity can run chronologically corresponding to the level of inquiry.This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab,...\",\"PeriodicalId\":246056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解伊斯兰学校教师基于探究水平对探究学习集理解的表征。本研究采用描述性研究方法,研究对象为斯拉根市3个城区的5名物理教师,采用随机抽样方法。本研究使用的研究工具是学习问卷,以教师开发的基于探究水平的学习集和学习集的文献研究。通过对教师问卷调查结果进行分类和呈现,进行数据分析。研究结果表明,教师对探究学习集发展的理解在探究的各个层次上是不同的。从各个层次的百分比可以发现,100%的教师理解并使用了发现学习、互动演示、探究性课的学习模式,80%的教师理解并使用了引导性探究实验室,30%的教师理解并使用了有界探究实验室,20%的教师理解并使用了自由探究实验室,40%的教师理解并使用了纯假设探究,30%的教师使用了假设探究。这表明一些教师对探究的层次认识不清,在探究性教学的发展过程中发现了一些制约因素。教师在开发基于探究层次的学习集时需要参考和促进活动,以便在以后的探究活动中能够按照探究层次的时间顺序进行。本研究旨在了解伊斯兰学校教师基于探究水平对探究学习集理解的表征。本研究采用描述性研究方法,研究对象为斯拉根市3个城区的5名物理教师,采用随机抽样方法。本研究使用的研究工具是学习问卷,以教师开发的基于探究水平的学习集和学习集的文献研究。通过对教师问卷调查结果进行分类和呈现,进行数据分析。研究结果表明,教师对探究学习集发展的理解在探究的各个层次上是不同的。从各个层次的百分比可以发现,100%的教师理解并使用了发现学习、互动演示、探究性课的学习模式,80%的教师理解并使用了引导性探究实验室,30%的教师理解并使用了有界探究实验室,20%的教师理解并使用了自由探究实验室,……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The profile of teachers’ problem related to inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry in physics learning in Madrasah Aliyah (MAN)
This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab, 40% Pure hypothetical inquiry, and 30% applied hypothetical inquiry. It indicated that some teachers have not understood the level of inquiry and find some constraints with the development of inquiry-based set. Teachers needed reference and facilitation activity in developing learning set based on level of inquiry, so that in the future inquiry activity can run chronologically corresponding to the level of inquiry.This research aimed to find out the representation of Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) teachers’ understanding on inquiry learning set based on level of inquiry. The research method employed was descriptive one with the subject of research consisting of 5 physics teachers in three MANs in Sragen City, taken using random sampling technique. The instrument of research used was learning questionnaire to see the learning set based on level of inquiry developed by teacher and document study of learning set. Data analysis was conducted by categorizing and presenting the result of teachers’ questionnaire. The result of research showed that teachers’ understanding related to the development of inquiring learning set is varying in each level of inquiry. From the percentage of each level, it can be found out that 100% of teachers have understood and used discovery learning, interactive demonstration, inquiry lesson learning models, 80% have understood and used guided inquiry lab, 30% bounded inquiry lab, 20% free inquiry lab,...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The success of integrated education: Implementation of education policies and management in special services Virtual lab for vocational education in Indonesia: A review of the literature The effect of direct instruction and problem based learning on millennial Learning difficulties in microteaching class: A case study Education for sustainable development: Student’s biophilia and the Emome model as an alternative efforts of enhancement in the perspectives of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1