H∞与QFT在无人机高度指令跟踪器中的应用比较

J. López, R. Dormido, J. Gómez, S. Dormido, J. M. Díaz
{"title":"H∞与QFT在无人机高度指令跟踪器中的应用比较","authors":"J. López, R. Dormido, J. Gómez, S. Dormido, J. M. Díaz","doi":"10.23919/ECC.2007.7068482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this paper is to design and compare two altitude command tracker controllers for an UAV using H∞ and QFT techniques. Both methods require the use of specialized software tools. The different stages of QFT methodology have been done with help of software tool QFTIT (Quantitative Feedback Theory Interactive Tool). This is a free software tool that is characterized by its easy of use and interactive nature. QFT's standing as a viable control design method that can be applied to practical problems and produce implementable results. Tests with realistically large control inputs are use to validate and compare both designs.","PeriodicalId":407048,"journal":{"name":"2007 European Control Conference (ECC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of H∞ with QFT applied to an altitude command tracker for an UAV\",\"authors\":\"J. López, R. Dormido, J. Gómez, S. Dormido, J. M. Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ECC.2007.7068482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this paper is to design and compare two altitude command tracker controllers for an UAV using H∞ and QFT techniques. Both methods require the use of specialized software tools. The different stages of QFT methodology have been done with help of software tool QFTIT (Quantitative Feedback Theory Interactive Tool). This is a free software tool that is characterized by its easy of use and interactive nature. QFT's standing as a viable control design method that can be applied to practical problems and produce implementable results. Tests with realistically large control inputs are use to validate and compare both designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 European Control Conference (ECC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2007.7068482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 European Control Conference (ECC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2007.7068482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的主要目的是利用H∞和QFT技术设计和比较无人机的两种高度指令跟踪控制器。这两种方法都需要使用专门的软件工具。在软件工具QFTIT(定量反馈理论交互工具)的帮助下,完成了QFT方法的不同阶段。这是一个自由的软件工具,其特点是易于使用和交互的性质。QFT作为一种可行的控制设计方法,可以应用于实际问题并产生可实现的结果。使用实际较大控制输入的测试来验证和比较两种设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of H∞ with QFT applied to an altitude command tracker for an UAV
The main objective of this paper is to design and compare two altitude command tracker controllers for an UAV using H∞ and QFT techniques. Both methods require the use of specialized software tools. The different stages of QFT methodology have been done with help of software tool QFTIT (Quantitative Feedback Theory Interactive Tool). This is a free software tool that is characterized by its easy of use and interactive nature. QFT's standing as a viable control design method that can be applied to practical problems and produce implementable results. Tests with realistically large control inputs are use to validate and compare both designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum Likelihood estimation of state space models from frequency domain data Output feedback H∞ control of continuous-time infinite Markovian jump linear systems via LMI methods Visual servoing of a parallel robot system Comparison between SOS approach and Slack Variable approach for non-negativity check of polynomial functions: Multiple variable case Integrating Hamiltonian systems defined on the Lie groups SO(4) and SO(1,3)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1