数据挖掘中知识表示的决策逻辑

T. Fan, Wu-Chih Hu, C. Liau
{"title":"数据挖掘中知识表示的决策逻辑","authors":"T. Fan, Wu-Chih Hu, C. Liau","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.2001.960678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the qualitative and quantitative semantics for rules in data tables are investigated from a logical viewpoint. In modern data analysis, knowledge can be discovered from data tables and is usually represented by some rules. However the knowledge is useful for a human user only when he can understand the meaning of the rules. This is called the interpretability problem of intelligent data analysis. The solution of the problem depends on the selection of the rule representation language. A good representation language should have clear semantics so that a rule can be effectively validated with respect to the given data tables. In this regard, logic is one of the best choices. Starting from reviewing the decision logic for data tables, we subsequently generalize it to fuzzy and possibilistic decision logics. The rules are then viewed as the implications between well-formed formulas of these logics and their semantics with respect to precise or uncertain data tables are presented. The validity, support, and confidence of a rule are also rigorously defined in the framework.","PeriodicalId":269568,"journal":{"name":"25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC 2001","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision logics for knowledge representation in data mining\",\"authors\":\"T. Fan, Wu-Chih Hu, C. Liau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPSAC.2001.960678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the qualitative and quantitative semantics for rules in data tables are investigated from a logical viewpoint. In modern data analysis, knowledge can be discovered from data tables and is usually represented by some rules. However the knowledge is useful for a human user only when he can understand the meaning of the rules. This is called the interpretability problem of intelligent data analysis. The solution of the problem depends on the selection of the rule representation language. A good representation language should have clear semantics so that a rule can be effectively validated with respect to the given data tables. In this regard, logic is one of the best choices. Starting from reviewing the decision logic for data tables, we subsequently generalize it to fuzzy and possibilistic decision logics. The rules are then viewed as the implications between well-formed formulas of these logics and their semantics with respect to precise or uncertain data tables are presented. The validity, support, and confidence of a rule are also rigorously defined in the framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC 2001\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC 2001\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.2001.960678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.2001.960678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文从逻辑的角度研究了数据表中规则的定性和定量语义。在现代数据分析中,知识可以从数据表中发现,通常用一些规则来表示。然而,只有当人类用户能够理解规则的含义时,这些知识才有用。这被称为智能数据分析的可解释性问题。问题的解决取决于规则表示语言的选择。良好的表示语言应该具有清晰的语义,这样就可以根据给定的数据表有效地验证规则。在这方面,逻辑是最好的选择之一。从回顾数据表的决策逻辑开始,我们随后将其推广到模糊和可能性决策逻辑。然后将规则视为这些逻辑的格式良好的公式及其相对于精确或不确定数据表的语义之间的含义。规则的有效性、支持度和置信度也在框架中严格定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision logics for knowledge representation in data mining
In this paper the qualitative and quantitative semantics for rules in data tables are investigated from a logical viewpoint. In modern data analysis, knowledge can be discovered from data tables and is usually represented by some rules. However the knowledge is useful for a human user only when he can understand the meaning of the rules. This is called the interpretability problem of intelligent data analysis. The solution of the problem depends on the selection of the rule representation language. A good representation language should have clear semantics so that a rule can be effectively validated with respect to the given data tables. In this regard, logic is one of the best choices. Starting from reviewing the decision logic for data tables, we subsequently generalize it to fuzzy and possibilistic decision logics. The rules are then viewed as the implications between well-formed formulas of these logics and their semantics with respect to precise or uncertain data tables are presented. The validity, support, and confidence of a rule are also rigorously defined in the framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using SOAP to clean up configuration management An application of data warehouse technology to the measurement system for UML based artifacts InfoSleuth: agent-based system for data integration and analysis Formal and use-case driven requirement analysis in UML A long and winding road (Progress on the road to a software engineering profession)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1