STEM学生寻求咨询的障碍:修订的适合度、污名和价值量表

Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Gabriella Miceli
{"title":"STEM学生寻求咨询的障碍:修订的适合度、污名和价值量表","authors":"Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Gabriella Miceli","doi":"10.15241/mtk.12.3.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meeting the mental health needs of students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors is particularly challenging for professional counselors who work in college settings, as STEM students are a subgroup of college students that face unique risks for developing mental health issues. The scarcity of literature on STEM student mental health coupled with their reticence to seek counseling is concerning. An important next step in this line of research is understanding why STEM students are reticent to seek counseling. Accordingly, the present investigators validated STEM students’ scores on the Revised Fit, Stigma, and Value (RFSV) Scale, a screening tool for measuring barriers to seeking counseling. Results also established the capacity of STEM students’ RFSV scores to predict peer-to-peer referrals to the counseling center and revealed demographic differences in barriers to counseling. Findings have implications for enhancing professional counselors’ efforts to support STEM students’ mental health.","PeriodicalId":179932,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Counselor","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Seeking Counseling Among STEM Students: The Revised Fit, Stigma, and Value Scale\",\"authors\":\"Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Gabriella Miceli\",\"doi\":\"10.15241/mtk.12.3.249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meeting the mental health needs of students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors is particularly challenging for professional counselors who work in college settings, as STEM students are a subgroup of college students that face unique risks for developing mental health issues. The scarcity of literature on STEM student mental health coupled with their reticence to seek counseling is concerning. An important next step in this line of research is understanding why STEM students are reticent to seek counseling. Accordingly, the present investigators validated STEM students’ scores on the Revised Fit, Stigma, and Value (RFSV) Scale, a screening tool for measuring barriers to seeking counseling. Results also established the capacity of STEM students’ RFSV scores to predict peer-to-peer referrals to the counseling center and revealed demographic differences in barriers to counseling. Findings have implications for enhancing professional counselors’ efforts to support STEM students’ mental health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Professional Counselor\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Professional Counselor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15241/mtk.12.3.249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15241/mtk.12.3.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

满足科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)专业学生的心理健康需求,对于在大学环境中工作的专业咨询师来说尤其具有挑战性,因为STEM学生是大学生的一个子集,面临着发展心理健康问题的独特风险。关于STEM学生心理健康的文献缺乏,加上他们不愿寻求咨询,这令人担忧。这方面研究的重要下一步是了解STEM学生不愿寻求咨询的原因。因此,本研究人员验证了STEM学生在修订的适应、耻辱和价值量表(RFSV)上的分数,RFSV是衡量寻求咨询障碍的筛选工具。结果还确定了STEM学生的RFSV分数预测向咨询中心转诊的能力,并揭示了心理咨询障碍的人口统计学差异。研究结果对加强专业咨询师支持STEM学生心理健康的努力具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to Seeking Counseling Among STEM Students: The Revised Fit, Stigma, and Value Scale
Meeting the mental health needs of students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors is particularly challenging for professional counselors who work in college settings, as STEM students are a subgroup of college students that face unique risks for developing mental health issues. The scarcity of literature on STEM student mental health coupled with their reticence to seek counseling is concerning. An important next step in this line of research is understanding why STEM students are reticent to seek counseling. Accordingly, the present investigators validated STEM students’ scores on the Revised Fit, Stigma, and Value (RFSV) Scale, a screening tool for measuring barriers to seeking counseling. Results also established the capacity of STEM students’ RFSV scores to predict peer-to-peer referrals to the counseling center and revealed demographic differences in barriers to counseling. Findings have implications for enhancing professional counselors’ efforts to support STEM students’ mental health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions and Experiences of School Counselor Trainees on Self-Care Grounded in Mindfulness and Social-Emotional Learning Teen Dating Violence: Examining Counseling Students' Responses to Gendered Vignettes A Phenomenological Exploration of Counselors-in-Training’s Experiences of Microaggressions from Clients An Examination of Client Bias Toward Overweight, Underweight, and Average-Weight Counselors Adult Adoptees’ Adoption-Related Experiences of Counseling, Loss, and Grief: A Transcendental Phenomenological Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1