南非的新民主空间?-动员实现土地权利和社会正义

Cynthia Kwakyewah
{"title":"南非的新民主空间?-动员实现土地权利和社会正义","authors":"Cynthia Kwakyewah","doi":"10.25071/2291-3637.37184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the dominant perspective in the state failure debate has described underdeveloped African countries as inherently undemocratic and dysfunctional, South Africa is deemed as an emerging economic power with exemplary democratic practices. At the same time, proponents of the democracy-development theory have made claims about the alleged relationship between a nation's socio-economic progression and its democratic institutions. Focusing mainly on South Africa, this article examines the validity of these claims and argues that given the prevailing race-based social divide and the immense socio-economic disparity, the process of democratization in South Africa has been rather limited. Indeed, democracy in South Africa manifests severe weaknesses equal to other African countries. Notwithstanding these weaknesses, the advent of social movements such as the Landless People's Movement points to the opening of a new democratic space that provides political opportunities for citizens.","PeriodicalId":192252,"journal":{"name":"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Democratic Space in South Africa? – Mobilizing Towards Land Rights and Social Justice\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Kwakyewah\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/2291-3637.37184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the dominant perspective in the state failure debate has described underdeveloped African countries as inherently undemocratic and dysfunctional, South Africa is deemed as an emerging economic power with exemplary democratic practices. At the same time, proponents of the democracy-development theory have made claims about the alleged relationship between a nation's socio-economic progression and its democratic institutions. Focusing mainly on South Africa, this article examines the validity of these claims and argues that given the prevailing race-based social divide and the immense socio-economic disparity, the process of democratization in South Africa has been rather limited. Indeed, democracy in South Africa manifests severe weaknesses equal to other African countries. Notwithstanding these weaknesses, the advent of social movements such as the Landless People's Movement points to the opening of a new democratic space that provides political opportunities for citizens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-3637.37184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HPS: The Journal of History and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-3637.37184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在关于国家失败的辩论中,主流观点将不发达的非洲国家描述为本质上不民主和功能失调的国家,而南非则被视为一个新兴的经济大国,拥有堪称典范的民主实践。与此同时,民主发展理论的支持者对一个国家的社会经济进步与其民主制度之间的所谓关系提出了主张。本文主要以南非为重点,审查了这些说法的有效性,并认为,鉴于普遍存在的以种族为基础的社会鸿沟和巨大的社会经济差距,南非的民主化进程相当有限。的确,南非的民主表现出与其他非洲国家一样的严重弱点。尽管存在这些弱点,无地人民运动等社会运动的出现表明,开辟了一个新的民主空间,为公民提供了政治机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Democratic Space in South Africa? – Mobilizing Towards Land Rights and Social Justice
While the dominant perspective in the state failure debate has described underdeveloped African countries as inherently undemocratic and dysfunctional, South Africa is deemed as an emerging economic power with exemplary democratic practices. At the same time, proponents of the democracy-development theory have made claims about the alleged relationship between a nation's socio-economic progression and its democratic institutions. Focusing mainly on South Africa, this article examines the validity of these claims and argues that given the prevailing race-based social divide and the immense socio-economic disparity, the process of democratization in South Africa has been rather limited. Indeed, democracy in South Africa manifests severe weaknesses equal to other African countries. Notwithstanding these weaknesses, the advent of social movements such as the Landless People's Movement points to the opening of a new democratic space that provides political opportunities for citizens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Stepping up to the Call:" A Historiographical Analysis of Gender in 1930s Soviet Russia “Comme des bons pères de famille:” Masculinity, Patriarchy, and the Transnational Violences of Slavery in French Colonial North America Caput Mundi: An Analysis of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus as a Case of Etruscan Influence on Roman Religious Architecture Luxemburg’s Dilemmas: Lessons in Marxism as Political Praxis “Plus Ten Percent for Forcible Taking:” Construction of the St. Lawrence Seaway as Environmental Racism on Kahnawà:ke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1