焦点小组讨论与生活方式反馈两种方法对孕妇自我保健效果的比较

Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami
{"title":"焦点小组讨论与生活方式反馈两种方法对孕妇自我保健效果的比较","authors":"Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami","doi":"10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women. \nMethods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level. \nFindings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method. \nConclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":300087,"journal":{"name":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Effectiveness Self-care Returns Two Methods of Focus Group Discussions and Teach-back on Lifestyle of Pregnant Women\",\"authors\":\"Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women. \\nMethods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level. \\nFindings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method. \\nConclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较焦点小组讨论与反导式自我保健教育对孕妇生活方式促进的效果。方法与材料:在这项随机现场试验中,参与者是90名被转介到伊朗Gonabad社区卫生中心的孕妇,这些孕妇没有影响其自我保健的生理和心理问题史。他们是从三个健康中心随机抽取的,分为焦点小组讨论组、反馈组和对照组三组。数据收集工具是人口统计表格和沃克健康促进生活方式问卷(HPLP),分别在干预前和干预后一个月完成。收集的资料在SPSS v. 20软件中进行独立t检验、配对t检验和方差分析。以p <0.05为显著性水平。结果:三组在受教育程度(P=0.029)、职业(P=0.090)、收入(P=0.099)、胎龄(P=0.741)方面差异无统计学意义,具有同质性。干预后,两组反导组(P<0.001)和焦点小组讨论组(P<0.001)在促进健康生活方式各方面(除压力管理外)均较对照组显著改善(P=0.66)。在两种教育方式的比较中,焦点小组讨论对生活方式的影响比背教法更显著。结论:重点小组讨论法适用于孕妇自我保健教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Effectiveness Self-care Returns Two Methods of Focus Group Discussions and Teach-back on Lifestyle of Pregnant Women
Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women. Methods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level. Findings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method. Conclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
مقایسه تأثیر واقعیت مجازی و تنفس ریتمیک بر اضطراب بیماران کاندید آنژیوگرافی عروق کرونر مقایسه تأثیر مدت زمان و محل تزریق زیرجلدی انوکساپارین بر شدت درد و اندازه کبودی بیماران بستری در بخش مراقبت های قلبی The Prevalence of Depression in Iranian Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis متغیرهای تعیینکننده کیفیت زندگی مرتبط با سلامت در افراد مبتلا به اچآیوی Tuberculous Pericarditis Causing Severe Pericardial Effusion: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1