Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami
{"title":"焦点小组讨论与生活方式反馈两种方法对孕妇自我保健效果的比较","authors":"Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami","doi":"10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women. \nMethods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level. \nFindings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method. \nConclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":300087,"journal":{"name":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Effectiveness Self-care Returns Two Methods of Focus Group Discussions and Teach-back on Lifestyle of Pregnant Women\",\"authors\":\"Mitra Jaras1, Mohammad Reza Mansoorian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, Hossein Nezami\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women. \\nMethods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level. \\nFindings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method. \\nConclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/HMS.26.1.2761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较焦点小组讨论与反导式自我保健教育对孕妇生活方式促进的效果。方法与材料:在这项随机现场试验中,参与者是90名被转介到伊朗Gonabad社区卫生中心的孕妇,这些孕妇没有影响其自我保健的生理和心理问题史。他们是从三个健康中心随机抽取的,分为焦点小组讨论组、反馈组和对照组三组。数据收集工具是人口统计表格和沃克健康促进生活方式问卷(HPLP),分别在干预前和干预后一个月完成。收集的资料在SPSS v. 20软件中进行独立t检验、配对t检验和方差分析。以p <0.05为显著性水平。结果:三组在受教育程度(P=0.029)、职业(P=0.090)、收入(P=0.099)、胎龄(P=0.741)方面差异无统计学意义,具有同质性。干预后,两组反导组(P<0.001)和焦点小组讨论组(P<0.001)在促进健康生活方式各方面(除压力管理外)均较对照组显著改善(P=0.66)。在两种教育方式的比较中,焦点小组讨论对生活方式的影响比背教法更显著。结论:重点小组讨论法适用于孕妇自我保健教育。
Comparison of Effectiveness Self-care Returns Two Methods of Focus Group Discussions and Teach-back on Lifestyle of Pregnant Women
Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of self-care education using focus group discussion and teach-back method on the lifestyle promotion of pregnant women.
Methods & Materials: In this randomized field trial, participants were 90 pregnant women referred to the community health centers in Gonabad, Iran with no history of physical and psychological problems that can affect their self-care. They were randomly selected from among the three health centers and divided into three groups of focus group discussion, teach-back, and control. The data collection tools were a demographic form, and Walker’s Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) questionnaire completed before and one month after the intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS v. 20 software using independent t-test, paired t-test and ANOVA. The P-value <0.05 was set as the significance level.
Findings: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of educational level (P=0.029), occupation (P=0.090), income (P=0.099), and gestational age (P=0.741), and they were homogeneous. After intervention, all aspects of health-promoting lifestyle (except stress management) in two groups of teach-back (P<0.001) and focus group discussion (P<0.001) were significantly improved compared to the control group (P=0.66). In comparing the two educational methods, focus group discussion had a more significant impact on the lifestyle than the teach-back method.
Conclusion: Focus group discussion method is recommended for the self-care education of pregnant women.