本土知识的认识论地位:一种社会认识论方法

Risalatul Hukmi, R. Mahaswa, Putu, Pradnya Lingga
{"title":"本土知识的认识论地位:一种社会认识论方法","authors":"Risalatul Hukmi, R. Mahaswa, Putu, Pradnya Lingga","doi":"10.29037/digitalpress.49447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion \nof indigenous knowledge has mostly been constructed based on the assumption \nthat knowledge is actually intertwined with any certain socio-cultural \ncondition. In that assumption, the social somehow is considered determining how \nknowledge is produced and obtained in any society. In other words, the \ntenability of knowledge is not measured merely by individual reasoning but \nthrough the question of how some beliefs can be justified by social context. \nHence, the main objective of this paper is to argue that indigenous knowledge \nis as valid as scientific knowledge with some conditions, that is its openness \nto be falsified. Therefore, the paper argues that the separation between \nindigenous knowledge and scientific knowledge is irrelevant.","PeriodicalId":270635,"journal":{"name":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Epistemic Status of Indigenous Knowledge: A Socio-epistemological Approach\",\"authors\":\"Risalatul Hukmi, R. Mahaswa, Putu, Pradnya Lingga\",\"doi\":\"10.29037/digitalpress.49447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion \\nof indigenous knowledge has mostly been constructed based on the assumption \\nthat knowledge is actually intertwined with any certain socio-cultural \\ncondition. In that assumption, the social somehow is considered determining how \\nknowledge is produced and obtained in any society. In other words, the \\ntenability of knowledge is not measured merely by individual reasoning but \\nthrough the question of how some beliefs can be justified by social context. \\nHence, the main objective of this paper is to argue that indigenous knowledge \\nis as valid as scientific knowledge with some conditions, that is its openness \\nto be falsified. Therefore, the paper argues that the separation between \\nindigenous knowledge and scientific knowledge is irrelevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.49447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.49447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土著知识的概念主要是基于知识实际上与任何特定的社会文化条件交织在一起的假设而构建的。在这种假设中,社会在某种程度上被认为决定了任何社会如何产生和获得知识。换句话说,知识的可成立性不仅仅是通过个人推理来衡量的,而是通过如何在社会背景下证明某些信念是正确的问题来衡量的。因此,本文的主要目的是论证本土知识在一定条件下与科学知识一样有效,即其可被证伪的开放性。因此,本文认为本土知识与科学知识的分离是不相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Epistemic Status of Indigenous Knowledge: A Socio-epistemological Approach
The notion of indigenous knowledge has mostly been constructed based on the assumption that knowledge is actually intertwined with any certain socio-cultural condition. In that assumption, the social somehow is considered determining how knowledge is produced and obtained in any society. In other words, the tenability of knowledge is not measured merely by individual reasoning but through the question of how some beliefs can be justified by social context. Hence, the main objective of this paper is to argue that indigenous knowledge is as valid as scientific knowledge with some conditions, that is its openness to be falsified. Therefore, the paper argues that the separation between indigenous knowledge and scientific knowledge is irrelevant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Readiness of Course and Training Agency (LKP) in Link & Match Program with Business and Industry Sector A Systematic Review: Community Support in Employment Skill Development of Intellectual Disabilities People The Role of the Community in Building a Tourist Village Intuition linguistique et stratégie de l’apprentissage des étudiants « faibles » Le modèle d’apprentissage de la production orale à travers Skype basé sur la culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1