中性碳关税的机遇与局限

Juscelino F. Colares, Ashwin Rode
{"title":"中性碳关税的机遇与局限","authors":"Juscelino F. Colares, Ashwin Rode","doi":"10.1093/ALER/AHX012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because carbon taxes can lead to loss of competitiveness, applying tariffs on imports from non-carbon-restricting countries helps address the cost disadvantage faced by producers in carbon-restricting countries. Such tariffs, known as border carbon adjustments (BCAs), can also help reduce possible carbon “leakage,” or the growth in foreign emissions due to increased production of carbon-intensive goods in non-carbon-restricting countries. We demonstrate that BCAs that do not exceed the burdens imposed by carbon taxation on domestic like products could be consistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. However, “neutral” (i.e., nondiscriminatory) BCAs might still be inefficiently high from a global welfare perspective. This stems from the misaligned focus of BCAs on imports rather than production—the real cause of emissions. The discrepancy between neutrality and efficiency enables carbon-restricted industries to seek inefficiently high BCAs. Recognition of this discrepancy strengthens the case for multilateral alternatives that curb global carbon emissions.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Opportunities and Limitations of Neutral Carbon Tariffs\",\"authors\":\"Juscelino F. Colares, Ashwin Rode\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ALER/AHX012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because carbon taxes can lead to loss of competitiveness, applying tariffs on imports from non-carbon-restricting countries helps address the cost disadvantage faced by producers in carbon-restricting countries. Such tariffs, known as border carbon adjustments (BCAs), can also help reduce possible carbon “leakage,” or the growth in foreign emissions due to increased production of carbon-intensive goods in non-carbon-restricting countries. We demonstrate that BCAs that do not exceed the burdens imposed by carbon taxation on domestic like products could be consistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. However, “neutral” (i.e., nondiscriminatory) BCAs might still be inefficiently high from a global welfare perspective. This stems from the misaligned focus of BCAs on imports rather than production—the real cause of emissions. The discrepancy between neutrality and efficiency enables carbon-restricted industries to seek inefficiently high BCAs. Recognition of this discrepancy strengthens the case for multilateral alternatives that curb global carbon emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ALER/AHX012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ALER/AHX012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于碳税可能导致竞争力丧失,对来自非碳限制国家的进口产品征收关税有助于解决碳限制国家生产商面临的成本劣势。这种关税被称为边境碳调整(bca),也有助于减少可能的碳“泄漏”,即由于非碳限制国家增加碳密集型产品生产而导致的外国排放量增长。我们证明,不超过碳税对国内同类产品施加的负担的bca可能符合世界贸易组织(WTO)规则。然而,从全球福利的角度来看,“中性”(即非歧视)的基础设施投资可能仍然是低效的。这源于bca对进口而非生产的错位关注——这才是排放的真正原因。中性和效率之间的差异使得碳限制行业寻求效率低下的高bca。对这种差异的认识,加强了遏制全球碳排放的多边替代方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Opportunities and Limitations of Neutral Carbon Tariffs
Because carbon taxes can lead to loss of competitiveness, applying tariffs on imports from non-carbon-restricting countries helps address the cost disadvantage faced by producers in carbon-restricting countries. Such tariffs, known as border carbon adjustments (BCAs), can also help reduce possible carbon “leakage,” or the growth in foreign emissions due to increased production of carbon-intensive goods in non-carbon-restricting countries. We demonstrate that BCAs that do not exceed the burdens imposed by carbon taxation on domestic like products could be consistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. However, “neutral” (i.e., nondiscriminatory) BCAs might still be inefficiently high from a global welfare perspective. This stems from the misaligned focus of BCAs on imports rather than production—the real cause of emissions. The discrepancy between neutrality and efficiency enables carbon-restricted industries to seek inefficiently high BCAs. Recognition of this discrepancy strengthens the case for multilateral alternatives that curb global carbon emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of Administrative Discretion: A Case Study of Pakistan The Tension between Global Public Procurement Law and Nationalist/Populist Tendencies: Proposals for Reform Inhabiting Different Realities: Incrementalism, Paradigms and the New Prospect Public Administration Reform in Bulgaria: Top-down and Externally-driven Approach Una Revisión a Los Servicios Públicos de Solidaridad en la Unión Europea (A Review to the Notion of Social Services of General Interest in the European Union )
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1