迈向基于约束的模型类型:模型泛型的一般化形式基础

VAO '14 Pub Date : 2014-07-22 DOI:10.1145/2631675.2631678
S. Zschaler
{"title":"迈向基于约束的模型类型:模型泛型的一般化形式基础","authors":"S. Zschaler","doi":"10.1145/2631675.2631678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing popularity of model-driven engineering, reusability and compositionality of model-management operations, including model transformations, becomes more important. One way of addressing this problem is through generic typing mechanisms for the parameters and outputs of such operations---essentially, introducing operation-specific views. There are two competing proposals for such type mechanisms available in the literature. However, it is not clear how they compare, whether they are complete or if they are indeed correct.\n In this paper, I present a generalisation of the notion of a model type. I show how this notion can be used to define a type system for model-management operations and how the two existing proposals for generic model typing (model (sub-) typing and model concepts) can be encoded in the general notion. I believe that this general notion can provide the basis for a systematic study, comparison, and unification of the existing pragmatic proposals.","PeriodicalId":302777,"journal":{"name":"VAO '14","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Constraint-Based Model Types: A Generalised Formal Foundation for Model Genericity\",\"authors\":\"S. Zschaler\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2631675.2631678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increasing popularity of model-driven engineering, reusability and compositionality of model-management operations, including model transformations, becomes more important. One way of addressing this problem is through generic typing mechanisms for the parameters and outputs of such operations---essentially, introducing operation-specific views. There are two competing proposals for such type mechanisms available in the literature. However, it is not clear how they compare, whether they are complete or if they are indeed correct.\\n In this paper, I present a generalisation of the notion of a model type. I show how this notion can be used to define a type system for model-management operations and how the two existing proposals for generic model typing (model (sub-) typing and model concepts) can be encoded in the general notion. I believe that this general notion can provide the basis for a systematic study, comparison, and unification of the existing pragmatic proposals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VAO '14\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VAO '14\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2631675.2631678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VAO '14","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2631675.2631678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

随着模型驱动工程的日益普及,模型管理操作(包括模型转换)的可重用性和组合性变得更加重要。解决此问题的一种方法是通过此类操作的参数和输出的泛型类型机制——本质上是引入特定于操作的视图。对于这种类型的机制,文献中有两种相互竞争的建议。然而,尚不清楚它们是如何比较的,它们是否完整或是否确实正确。在本文中,我提出了模型类型概念的概括。我将展示如何使用此概念定义用于模型管理操作的类型系统,以及如何将现有的两个泛型模型类型建议(模型(子)类型和模型概念)编码到通用概念中。我认为,这一总体概念可以为系统地研究、比较和统一现有的务实建议提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Constraint-Based Model Types: A Generalised Formal Foundation for Model Genericity
With the increasing popularity of model-driven engineering, reusability and compositionality of model-management operations, including model transformations, becomes more important. One way of addressing this problem is through generic typing mechanisms for the parameters and outputs of such operations---essentially, introducing operation-specific views. There are two competing proposals for such type mechanisms available in the literature. However, it is not clear how they compare, whether they are complete or if they are indeed correct. In this paper, I present a generalisation of the notion of a model type. I show how this notion can be used to define a type system for model-management operations and how the two existing proposals for generic model typing (model (sub-) typing and model concepts) can be encoded in the general notion. I believe that this general notion can provide the basis for a systematic study, comparison, and unification of the existing pragmatic proposals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Criteria for Orthographic Viewpoints Towards Constraint-Based Model Types: A Generalised Formal Foundation for Model Genericity Proposal for a Multi-View Modelling Case Study: Component-Based Software Engineering with UML, Plug-ins, and Java A Method for Aspect-oriented Meta-Model Evolution Viewpoints and Views in Hardware Platform Modeling for Safe Deployment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1