私募股权,工作和生产力:回复Ayash和Rastad

S. Davis, J. Haltiwanger, Kyle Handley, Ron S. Jarmin, J. Lerner, Javier Miranda
{"title":"私募股权,工作和生产力:回复Ayash和Rastad","authors":"S. Davis, J. Haltiwanger, Kyle Handley, Ron S. Jarmin, J. Lerner, Javier Miranda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3113272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ayash and Rastad (2017) express several concerns about our 2014 analysis of private equity buyouts. We welcome their interest in our work but think their criticisms are off the mark. Some of their claims reflect a misunderstanding of the Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) and its underlying data inputs. Because the LBD has emerged as a major laboratory for empirical studies in economics and finance, we use this opportunity to reiterate and clarify some of its important features. In a similar spirit, we elaborate on steps taken to develop our large sample of private equity buyouts. We also address Ayash and Rastad’s remarks about the empirical design of our establishment-level analysis, our methods for distinguishing between leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and other private equity transactions, bankruptcy rates among firms acquired in LBOs, their assertion that we undercount large public-to-private LBOs, and other matters.","PeriodicalId":127572,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity: Reply to Ayash and Rastad\",\"authors\":\"S. Davis, J. Haltiwanger, Kyle Handley, Ron S. Jarmin, J. Lerner, Javier Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3113272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ayash and Rastad (2017) express several concerns about our 2014 analysis of private equity buyouts. We welcome their interest in our work but think their criticisms are off the mark. Some of their claims reflect a misunderstanding of the Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) and its underlying data inputs. Because the LBD has emerged as a major laboratory for empirical studies in economics and finance, we use this opportunity to reiterate and clarify some of its important features. In a similar spirit, we elaborate on steps taken to develop our large sample of private equity buyouts. We also address Ayash and Rastad’s remarks about the empirical design of our establishment-level analysis, our methods for distinguishing between leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and other private equity transactions, bankruptcy rates among firms acquired in LBOs, their assertion that we undercount large public-to-private LBOs, and other matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3113272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Leveraged Buyouts (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3113272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

Ayash和Rastad(2017)对我们2014年对私募股权收购的分析表达了几点担忧。我们欢迎他们对我们的工作感兴趣,但认为他们的批评离题了。他们的一些说法反映了对人口普查局纵向商业数据库(LBD)及其基础数据输入的误解。由于伦敦商业银行已经成为经济学和金融学实证研究的主要实验室,我们利用这个机会重申和澄清它的一些重要特征。本着类似的精神,我们详细阐述了为开发我们的大型私募股权收购样本所采取的步骤。我们还讨论了Ayash和Rastad关于我们的企业层面分析的实证设计,我们区分杠杆收购(lbo)和其他私募股权交易的方法,在lbo中收购的公司的破产率,他们断言我们低估了大型公私杠杆收购,以及其他问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity: Reply to Ayash and Rastad
Ayash and Rastad (2017) express several concerns about our 2014 analysis of private equity buyouts. We welcome their interest in our work but think their criticisms are off the mark. Some of their claims reflect a misunderstanding of the Census Bureau’s Longitudinal Business Database (LBD) and its underlying data inputs. Because the LBD has emerged as a major laboratory for empirical studies in economics and finance, we use this opportunity to reiterate and clarify some of its important features. In a similar spirit, we elaborate on steps taken to develop our large sample of private equity buyouts. We also address Ayash and Rastad’s remarks about the empirical design of our establishment-level analysis, our methods for distinguishing between leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and other private equity transactions, bankruptcy rates among firms acquired in LBOs, their assertion that we undercount large public-to-private LBOs, and other matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Private Equity and Human Capital Risk Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity: Reply to Ayash and Rastad A Theory of LBO Activity Based on Repeated Debt-Equity Conflicts Fare Thee Well? An Analysis of Buyout Funds' Exit Strategies The Impact of Investor Protection Law on Takeovers: The Case of Leveraged Buyouts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1