意见分歧会影响股票收益吗?来自日本seo的证据

H. Kato, Katsushi Suzuki
{"title":"意见分歧会影响股票收益吗?来自日本seo的证据","authors":"H. Kato, Katsushi Suzuki","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2023490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The divergence of opinion model originally proposed by Miller (1977) has recently received a great deal of attention. Focusing on the unique offering process of Japanese seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), we are able to directly test the Miller model. A comparable analysis cannot be performed on U.S. SEOs. We find our proxy for divergence of opinion is negatively related to stock returns on both the announcement day and the issue day. This implies that the demand curve for the issuing firm’s common stock steepens as the dispersion of opinion for a stock widens. We find that issue size is also related to stock returns on both dates. The relation is stronger for stocks with higher dispersions of opinion. This finding is consistent with Miller’s prediction. We also show that short sales constraints cause market underreaction. Further, we show that manipulative short selling is concentrated around the price determination day. However, our results regarding opinion divergence are free from the manipulative short selling effect.","PeriodicalId":214104,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Divergence of Opinion Affect Stock Returns? Evidence from Japanese SEOs\",\"authors\":\"H. Kato, Katsushi Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2023490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The divergence of opinion model originally proposed by Miller (1977) has recently received a great deal of attention. Focusing on the unique offering process of Japanese seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), we are able to directly test the Miller model. A comparable analysis cannot be performed on U.S. SEOs. We find our proxy for divergence of opinion is negatively related to stock returns on both the announcement day and the issue day. This implies that the demand curve for the issuing firm’s common stock steepens as the dispersion of opinion for a stock widens. We find that issue size is also related to stock returns on both dates. The relation is stronger for stocks with higher dispersions of opinion. This finding is consistent with Miller’s prediction. We also show that short sales constraints cause market underreaction. Further, we show that manipulative short selling is concentrated around the price determination day. However, our results regarding opinion divergence are free from the manipulative short selling effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2023490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

Miller(1977)最初提出的意见分歧模型最近受到了广泛的关注。针对日本seo独特的发行流程,我们可以直接对Miller模型进行检验。无法对美国的seo进行可比分析。我们发现我们的意见分歧代理与公告日和发行日的股票收益负相关。这意味着发行公司普通股的需求曲线随着对股票的意见分散的扩大而变陡。我们发现发行规模也与这两个日期的股票收益相关。对于意见分散度较高的股票,这种关系更强。这一发现与米勒的预测一致。我们还表明,卖空限制导致市场反应不足。此外,我们表明,操纵卖空集中在价格决定日附近。然而,我们关于意见分歧的结果不受操纵卖空效应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Divergence of Opinion Affect Stock Returns? Evidence from Japanese SEOs
The divergence of opinion model originally proposed by Miller (1977) has recently received a great deal of attention. Focusing on the unique offering process of Japanese seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), we are able to directly test the Miller model. A comparable analysis cannot be performed on U.S. SEOs. We find our proxy for divergence of opinion is negatively related to stock returns on both the announcement day and the issue day. This implies that the demand curve for the issuing firm’s common stock steepens as the dispersion of opinion for a stock widens. We find that issue size is also related to stock returns on both dates. The relation is stronger for stocks with higher dispersions of opinion. This finding is consistent with Miller’s prediction. We also show that short sales constraints cause market underreaction. Further, we show that manipulative short selling is concentrated around the price determination day. However, our results regarding opinion divergence are free from the manipulative short selling effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growing Pains: International Instability and Equity Market Returns Valuing American Options Using Fast Recursive Projections Momentum and Reversal: Does What Goes Up Always Come Down? Macro Variables and the Components of Stock Returns Variance Risk Premium and VIX Pricing: A Simple GARCH Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1