亚太地区的贸易、增长和经济不平等:给政策制定者的教训

M. Greaney, Baybars Karacaovali
{"title":"亚太地区的贸易、增长和经济不平等:给政策制定者的教训","authors":"M. Greaney, Baybars Karacaovali","doi":"10.1453/JEPE.V4I2.1266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This policy brief is intended to provide policymakers with a summary of the results of our research project entitled \"Trade, Growth and Economic Inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region\", which explores and documents the linkages between international trade and inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). The project's eleven research papers will appear in a special issue of the Journal of Asian Economics in February, 2017. Overall we conclude that the relationships between international trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), economic growth and inequality are extremely complicated, so no single theory should be relied upon for policy guidance across all APR countries with their varying stages of development and unique characteristics. Our studies find some evidence that trade or FDI contribute to inequality, some evidence that it reduces inequality and some evidence of no causal relationship. These seemingly conflicting results are not at all surprising given the complex relationships involved and the different countries, time periods, and means of measuring inequality, trade and FDI our authors adopted. Our main takeaway for policymakers is to be wary of both anti-trade and pro-trade advocates who provide \"one size fits all\" advice related to trade, FDI and inequality; these economic relationships are much too complex for that.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade, Growth and Economic Inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region: Lessons for Policymakers\",\"authors\":\"M. Greaney, Baybars Karacaovali\",\"doi\":\"10.1453/JEPE.V4I2.1266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This policy brief is intended to provide policymakers with a summary of the results of our research project entitled \\\"Trade, Growth and Economic Inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region\\\", which explores and documents the linkages between international trade and inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). The project's eleven research papers will appear in a special issue of the Journal of Asian Economics in February, 2017. Overall we conclude that the relationships between international trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), economic growth and inequality are extremely complicated, so no single theory should be relied upon for policy guidance across all APR countries with their varying stages of development and unique characteristics. Our studies find some evidence that trade or FDI contribute to inequality, some evidence that it reduces inequality and some evidence of no causal relationship. These seemingly conflicting results are not at all surprising given the complex relationships involved and the different countries, time periods, and means of measuring inequality, trade and FDI our authors adopted. Our main takeaway for policymakers is to be wary of both anti-trade and pro-trade advocates who provide \\\"one size fits all\\\" advice related to trade, FDI and inequality; these economic relationships are much too complex for that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics and Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"190 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics and Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEPE.V4I2.1266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1453/JEPE.V4I2.1266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本政策简报旨在为政策制定者提供我们题为“亚太地区的贸易、增长和经济不平等”的研究项目的结果总结,该项目探索并记录了亚太地区国际贸易与不平等之间的联系。该项目的11篇研究论文将发表在2017年2月的《亚洲经济学杂志》特刊上。总体而言,我们得出结论,国际贸易、外国直接投资(FDI)、经济增长和不平等之间的关系极其复杂,因此不应依赖单一理论来指导所有处于不同发展阶段和独特特征的亚太地区国家的政策。我们的研究发现,一些证据表明贸易或外国直接投资助长了不平等,一些证据表明贸易或外国直接投资减少了不平等,还有一些证据表明没有因果关系。考虑到所涉及的复杂关系,以及我们的作者采用的不同国家、不同时期和衡量不平等、贸易和外国直接投资的方法,这些看似相互矛盾的结果一点也不令人惊讶。我们给政策制定者的主要启示是,要警惕反贸易和亲贸易的倡导者,他们在贸易、外国直接投资和不平等问题上提供“一刀切”的建议;这些经济关系太复杂了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trade, Growth and Economic Inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region: Lessons for Policymakers
This policy brief is intended to provide policymakers with a summary of the results of our research project entitled "Trade, Growth and Economic Inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region", which explores and documents the linkages between international trade and inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). The project's eleven research papers will appear in a special issue of the Journal of Asian Economics in February, 2017. Overall we conclude that the relationships between international trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), economic growth and inequality are extremely complicated, so no single theory should be relied upon for policy guidance across all APR countries with their varying stages of development and unique characteristics. Our studies find some evidence that trade or FDI contribute to inequality, some evidence that it reduces inequality and some evidence of no causal relationship. These seemingly conflicting results are not at all surprising given the complex relationships involved and the different countries, time periods, and means of measuring inequality, trade and FDI our authors adopted. Our main takeaway for policymakers is to be wary of both anti-trade and pro-trade advocates who provide "one size fits all" advice related to trade, FDI and inequality; these economic relationships are much too complex for that.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The determinants of the intermediate products export: The case of Switzerland Bank credit and transmission mechanisms of monetary policy in Uganda The contribution of human capital to the economic development of Cameroon, 1980-2018 Are they willing to participate? A review on behavioral economics approach to voters turnout Financialization and political economy of financial regulation in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1