刚刚完成了一个设计科学研究项目的周期:下一步是什么?

I. Bider, E. Perjons, P. Johannesson
{"title":"刚刚完成了一个设计科学研究项目的周期:下一步是什么?","authors":"I. Bider, E. Perjons, P. Johannesson","doi":"10.7250/csimq.2020-22.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to developing a methodological support for planning Design Science (DS) research projects. More exactly, it is aimed at developing a classification of a particular kind of cycles, inherent to DS research projects, and guidelines on how to choose the next cycle in a specific project. The classification and guidelines are based on results from an analysis of DS literature and a reflective analysis of our own research practice. As far as own research practice is concerned, two DS projects have been analyzed in detail. The analysis revealed that though both projects included cycles, the nature of these cycles was different. In the first project, cycles concerned finding a better problem to solve, while in the second project, cycles concerned finding a better solution for more or less the same problem. Both projects concern developing methodologies in the area of socio-technical systems, and the guidelines on how to choose the next cycle have special provisions related to such systems. In conclusion, the article presents examples of other projects that followed the suggested guidelines and discusses the difference of the suggested approach from other approaches to conduct DS research projects.","PeriodicalId":416219,"journal":{"name":"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just Finished a Cycle of a Design Science Research Project: What's Next?\",\"authors\":\"I. Bider, E. Perjons, P. Johannesson\",\"doi\":\"10.7250/csimq.2020-22.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to developing a methodological support for planning Design Science (DS) research projects. More exactly, it is aimed at developing a classification of a particular kind of cycles, inherent to DS research projects, and guidelines on how to choose the next cycle in a specific project. The classification and guidelines are based on results from an analysis of DS literature and a reflective analysis of our own research practice. As far as own research practice is concerned, two DS projects have been analyzed in detail. The analysis revealed that though both projects included cycles, the nature of these cycles was different. In the first project, cycles concerned finding a better problem to solve, while in the second project, cycles concerned finding a better solution for more or less the same problem. Both projects concern developing methodologies in the area of socio-technical systems, and the guidelines on how to choose the next cycle have special provisions related to such systems. In conclusion, the article presents examples of other projects that followed the suggested guidelines and discusses the difference of the suggested approach from other approaches to conduct DS research projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2020-22.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Syst. Informatics Model. Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2020-22.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文致力于为规划设计科学(DS)研究项目提供一种方法支持。更确切地说,它的目的是发展一种特定类型的周期的分类,固有的DS研究项目,并指导如何在一个特定的项目中选择下一个周期。分类和指南是基于DS文献分析的结果和我们自己研究实践的反思分析。就自己的研究实践而言,对两个DS项目进行了详细的分析。分析表明,虽然两个项目都包含周期,但这些周期的性质不同。在第一个项目中,周期涉及找到一个更好的问题来解决,而在第二个项目中,周期涉及为或多或少相同的问题找到一个更好的解决方案。这两个项目都涉及社会技术系统领域的发展方法,关于如何选择下一个周期的准则有与这些系统有关的特别规定。最后,本文介绍了遵循建议指导方针的其他项目的例子,并讨论了建议方法与其他方法进行DS研究项目的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Just Finished a Cycle of a Design Science Research Project: What's Next?
The article is devoted to developing a methodological support for planning Design Science (DS) research projects. More exactly, it is aimed at developing a classification of a particular kind of cycles, inherent to DS research projects, and guidelines on how to choose the next cycle in a specific project. The classification and guidelines are based on results from an analysis of DS literature and a reflective analysis of our own research practice. As far as own research practice is concerned, two DS projects have been analyzed in detail. The analysis revealed that though both projects included cycles, the nature of these cycles was different. In the first project, cycles concerned finding a better problem to solve, while in the second project, cycles concerned finding a better solution for more or less the same problem. Both projects concern developing methodologies in the area of socio-technical systems, and the guidelines on how to choose the next cycle have special provisions related to such systems. In conclusion, the article presents examples of other projects that followed the suggested guidelines and discusses the difference of the suggested approach from other approaches to conduct DS research projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discovering and Assessing Enterprise Architecture Debts Towards an E-Government Enterprise Architecture Framework for Developing Economies Trustworthiness Requirements in Information Systems Design: Lessons Learned from the Blockchain Community Business-IT Alignment: A Discussion on Enterprise Architecture and Blockchains. Editorial Introduction to Issue 35 of CSIMQ Supporting Information System Integration Decisions in the Post-Merger Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1