神学解释学和历史母题,第105-106页

A. Passaro
{"title":"神学解释学和历史母题,第105-106页","authors":"A. Passaro","doi":"10.1515/9783110186604.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the historical motifs present in Psalms 105 and 106 demands that it not be limited to the descriptive level alone. It is true that some of the final pages in Erik Haglund’s essay2, published in 1984, attempt an explanation of the meaning of the rehearsal of the historical motifs in the Psalms and of their Sitz im Leben. Fundamentally, however, he is interested in taking up and pointing out the traditions, that is the texts that stand as the basis for the reworking carried out in the Psalms. This is a route which is only apparently simple but rather frequently difficult because it tries to combine inner Biblical interpretation, with its need to set out refrains, allusions etc. – often conjectural – with a kind of historico-social analysis which undertakes to resolve the dates of composition of the text – an wavy operation, certainly necessary, to which the reader is referred, precisely for the descriptive level. This contribution is concerned, instead, with understanding the relecture of some segments of history carried out in Psalms 105-106 as something that reveals a hermeneutico-theological complex that emphasises a matter of principle in the history, the berît with the patriarchs which recalls and underlines the unilateral commitment of Yhwh to his people – a commitment whose unique attribute is !lw[ (Ps 105:10). To recall the commitment of God in praise, in the words of prayer, is, for Israel, to participate in the berît. The revisiting of history is thus a word/speech about God who is contemplated as involved in history in a role of solidarity, not of complicity (cf. Ps 106). This fundamental element throws light on and interprets the narrative routes of the two psalms, the one concerned with presenting, in almost elegiac terms, the action of God in history and his perennial fidelity, the other with underlining, with disarming frankness, the reality of the sin of Israel, its history of unfaithfulness, of non-reply to a rbD (cf. Ps 105:8) which knows neither limitations nor regrets and which is to become a “statute” and “law” to be kept (wytrwtw wyqj wrmvy: Ps 105:45).","PeriodicalId":393675,"journal":{"name":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theological Hermeneutics and Historical Motifs in Pss 105-106\",\"authors\":\"A. Passaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110186604.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analysis of the historical motifs present in Psalms 105 and 106 demands that it not be limited to the descriptive level alone. It is true that some of the final pages in Erik Haglund’s essay2, published in 1984, attempt an explanation of the meaning of the rehearsal of the historical motifs in the Psalms and of their Sitz im Leben. Fundamentally, however, he is interested in taking up and pointing out the traditions, that is the texts that stand as the basis for the reworking carried out in the Psalms. This is a route which is only apparently simple but rather frequently difficult because it tries to combine inner Biblical interpretation, with its need to set out refrains, allusions etc. – often conjectural – with a kind of historico-social analysis which undertakes to resolve the dates of composition of the text – an wavy operation, certainly necessary, to which the reader is referred, precisely for the descriptive level. This contribution is concerned, instead, with understanding the relecture of some segments of history carried out in Psalms 105-106 as something that reveals a hermeneutico-theological complex that emphasises a matter of principle in the history, the berît with the patriarchs which recalls and underlines the unilateral commitment of Yhwh to his people – a commitment whose unique attribute is !lw[ (Ps 105:10). To recall the commitment of God in praise, in the words of prayer, is, for Israel, to participate in the berît. The revisiting of history is thus a word/speech about God who is contemplated as involved in history in a role of solidarity, not of complicity (cf. Ps 106). This fundamental element throws light on and interprets the narrative routes of the two psalms, the one concerned with presenting, in almost elegiac terms, the action of God in history and his perennial fidelity, the other with underlining, with disarming frankness, the reality of the sin of Israel, its history of unfaithfulness, of non-reply to a rbD (cf. Ps 105:8) which knows neither limitations nor regrets and which is to become a “statute” and “law” to be kept (wytrwtw wyqj wrmvy: Ps 105:45).\",\"PeriodicalId\":393675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186604.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature. Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186604.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对诗篇105篇和106篇中出现的历史母题的分析要求它不仅仅局限于描述层面。的确,埃里克·哈格伦德在1984年发表的那篇随笔的最后几页,试图解释《诗篇》中历史母题的排演及其在黎巴嫩的境况的意义。然而,从根本上说,他感兴趣的是接受并指出传统,这些文本是重新编写诗篇的基础。这条路看起来很简单,但往往很困难,因为它试图结合圣经的内在解释,它需要列出叠句,典故等-通常是推测性的-与一种历史-社会分析相结合,这种分析致力于解决文本的构成日期-一种波浪式的操作,当然是必要的,读者被提到,正是为了描述的水平。相反,这一贡献与理解诗篇105-106中对一些历史片段的复述有关,因为它揭示了一种解释学-神学情结,强调了历史上的原则问题,与先祖的bert,回忆并强调了耶和华对他的人民的单方面承诺-这种承诺的独特属性是!(诗篇105:10)。对以色列来说,用祈祷的话语赞美上帝的承诺,就是参加bert。因此,回顾历史是一种关于天主的话语/演讲,祂被视为以团结的角色参与历史,而不是共谋(参阅咏106)。这个基本元素为解读和解释的叙述路线两个诗篇,关心呈现,几乎挽歌而言,上帝在历史上的作用和他的长期忠诚,突显出的其他的坦率,以色列的罪的现实,其历史不忠实,non-reply rbD (cf Ps 105:8),知道既不限制也不后悔,这是成为一个“法规”和“法律”(wytrwtw wyqj wrmvy:Ps 105:45)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theological Hermeneutics and Historical Motifs in Pss 105-106
The analysis of the historical motifs present in Psalms 105 and 106 demands that it not be limited to the descriptive level alone. It is true that some of the final pages in Erik Haglund’s essay2, published in 1984, attempt an explanation of the meaning of the rehearsal of the historical motifs in the Psalms and of their Sitz im Leben. Fundamentally, however, he is interested in taking up and pointing out the traditions, that is the texts that stand as the basis for the reworking carried out in the Psalms. This is a route which is only apparently simple but rather frequently difficult because it tries to combine inner Biblical interpretation, with its need to set out refrains, allusions etc. – often conjectural – with a kind of historico-social analysis which undertakes to resolve the dates of composition of the text – an wavy operation, certainly necessary, to which the reader is referred, precisely for the descriptive level. This contribution is concerned, instead, with understanding the relecture of some segments of history carried out in Psalms 105-106 as something that reveals a hermeneutico-theological complex that emphasises a matter of principle in the history, the berît with the patriarchs which recalls and underlines the unilateral commitment of Yhwh to his people – a commitment whose unique attribute is !lw[ (Ps 105:10). To recall the commitment of God in praise, in the words of prayer, is, for Israel, to participate in the berît. The revisiting of history is thus a word/speech about God who is contemplated as involved in history in a role of solidarity, not of complicity (cf. Ps 106). This fundamental element throws light on and interprets the narrative routes of the two psalms, the one concerned with presenting, in almost elegiac terms, the action of God in history and his perennial fidelity, the other with underlining, with disarming frankness, the reality of the sin of Israel, its history of unfaithfulness, of non-reply to a rbD (cf. Ps 105:8) which knows neither limitations nor regrets and which is to become a “statute” and “law” to be kept (wytrwtw wyqj wrmvy: Ps 105:45).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Our Forefathers Never Triumphed by Arms…” Abraham and His Offspring in the Pauline Writings Theological Hermeneutics and Historical Motifs in Pss 105-106 The Function of History in Early Rabbinic Liturgy Stephen’s Speech Before the Sanhedrin Against the Background of the Summaries of the History of Israel (Acts 7)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1