{"title":"对盖尤斯《研究所》中“Loco Filiae”表述的几点思考","authors":"Carlos Perelló, Patricio-Ignacio Carvajal Ramírez","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the meaning of the expression in \"loco filiae\" that Gaius uses to describe the position of the wife that has undergone a conventio in manum. Its aim is to ascertain whether or not manus, potestas and mancipium were equivalent powers, in the time of Gaius, by identifying, in particular, institutions which reflect disparate regulation of each.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some considerations on the expression \\\"Loco Filiae\\\" in Gaius' Institutes\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Perelló, Patricio-Ignacio Carvajal Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies the meaning of the expression in \\\"loco filiae\\\" that Gaius uses to describe the position of the wife that has undergone a conventio in manum. Its aim is to ascertain whether or not manus, potestas and mancipium were equivalent powers, in the time of Gaius, by identifying, in particular, institutions which reflect disparate regulation of each.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some considerations on the expression "Loco Filiae" in Gaius' Institutes
This article studies the meaning of the expression in "loco filiae" that Gaius uses to describe the position of the wife that has undergone a conventio in manum. Its aim is to ascertain whether or not manus, potestas and mancipium were equivalent powers, in the time of Gaius, by identifying, in particular, institutions which reflect disparate regulation of each.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
