约翰·h·m·拉斯利特和西摩·马丁·潘特主编。梦想的失败?《美国社会主义史随笔》(Garden City, ny: Anchor Books, 1974)

David R. Montgomery
{"title":"约翰·h·m·拉斯利特和西摩·马丁·潘特主编。梦想的失败?《美国社会主义史随笔》(Garden City, ny: Anchor Books, 1974)","authors":"David R. Montgomery","doi":"10.1017/S0097852300015720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"himself a Marxist; yet there is nothing here of the complex interaction of base and superstructure which is (or should be) the stuff of Marxist historiography. People and movements appear as the embodiments of doctrines, not as the products of social forces. Little trouble has been taken to explore the nature of German society and economy in the period in question, or to relate it to the problem under consideration, so it is scarcely surprising that the book sheds little or no light on the wider context of German history from 1863 to 1933. There are a few jejune, abstract and inaccurate assertions about industrialization, mainly culled from Marxist theory; but no hard information on how it really affected women. The challenge of writing a socialist history of women and their efforts to emancipate themselves has recently been taken up by many writers, most notably perhaps by the History Workshop school in Britain. It is safe to say that Dr. Thonnessen's book will be of no help to them in rising to this challenge.","PeriodicalId":363865,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John H. M. Laslett and Seymour Martin Upset, eds., Failure of a Dream ? Essays in the History of American Socialism (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1974)\",\"authors\":\"David R. Montgomery\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0097852300015720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"himself a Marxist; yet there is nothing here of the complex interaction of base and superstructure which is (or should be) the stuff of Marxist historiography. People and movements appear as the embodiments of doctrines, not as the products of social forces. Little trouble has been taken to explore the nature of German society and economy in the period in question, or to relate it to the problem under consideration, so it is scarcely surprising that the book sheds little or no light on the wider context of German history from 1863 to 1933. There are a few jejune, abstract and inaccurate assertions about industrialization, mainly culled from Marxist theory; but no hard information on how it really affected women. The challenge of writing a socialist history of women and their efforts to emancipate themselves has recently been taken up by many writers, most notably perhaps by the History Workshop school in Britain. It is safe to say that Dr. Thonnessen's book will be of no help to them in rising to this challenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

他自己是马克思主义者;然而,这里没有基础和上层建筑的复杂相互作用,这是(或应该是)马克思主义史学的材料。人和运动表现为学说的具体体现,而不是社会力量的产物。本书几乎没有花时间去探索这一时期德国社会和经济的本质,也没有将其与所考虑的问题联系起来,因此,这本书对1863年至1933年德国历史的更广泛背景几乎没有揭示,也就不足为奇了。关于工业化的一些幼稚、抽象、不准确的论断,主要是从马克思主义理论中剔除出来的;但没有确切的信息表明它是如何影响女性的。最近,许多作家,尤其是英国的“历史工作坊”(history Workshop)学派,都接受了写一部关于女性及其解放自身努力的社会主义历史的挑战。可以肯定地说,托内森博士的书对他们迎接这一挑战毫无帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
John H. M. Laslett and Seymour Martin Upset, eds., Failure of a Dream ? Essays in the History of American Socialism (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1974)
himself a Marxist; yet there is nothing here of the complex interaction of base and superstructure which is (or should be) the stuff of Marxist historiography. People and movements appear as the embodiments of doctrines, not as the products of social forces. Little trouble has been taken to explore the nature of German society and economy in the period in question, or to relate it to the problem under consideration, so it is scarcely surprising that the book sheds little or no light on the wider context of German history from 1863 to 1933. There are a few jejune, abstract and inaccurate assertions about industrialization, mainly culled from Marxist theory; but no hard information on how it really affected women. The challenge of writing a socialist history of women and their efforts to emancipate themselves has recently been taken up by many writers, most notably perhaps by the History Workshop school in Britain. It is safe to say that Dr. Thonnessen's book will be of no help to them in rising to this challenge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader John H. M. Laslett and Seymour Martin Upset, eds., Failure of a Dream ? Essays in the History of American Socialism (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1974) Bronterre O'Brien's Correspondence with Thomas Allsop: New Evidence on the Decline of a Chartist Leader Revolutionary and Counter-Revolutionary Thought in Habsburg Hungary, 1914–1918 International Approaches to the Study of Labor History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1