{"title":"为质量而编辑:我们是怎么做的","authors":"E. Wilde, R. Colvin","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.1996.552609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editing for quality (EFQ) is a process used by writers and editors at IBM's Santa Teresa Software Development laboratory to ensure information deliverables will meet customers' requirements and expectations. This editing process includes an overall appraisal of the information unit as a numeric score, or \"EFQ index\". An EFQ edit consists of a thorough technical edit providing detailed comments to the writer, a written report summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the information unit in each of the eight categories, and the EFQ index, which is a relative score on a scale of 1 to 100. This paper describes the EFQ process, how it improves the quality of information, and how it is expected to predict customer satisfaction. It also discusses the benefits to editors and writers, summarizing interviews conducted with those who have used the EFQ process.","PeriodicalId":375251,"journal":{"name":"IPCC 96: Communication on the Fast Track. IPCC 96 Proceedings","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editing for quality: how we're doing it\",\"authors\":\"E. Wilde, R. Colvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.1996.552609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Editing for quality (EFQ) is a process used by writers and editors at IBM's Santa Teresa Software Development laboratory to ensure information deliverables will meet customers' requirements and expectations. This editing process includes an overall appraisal of the information unit as a numeric score, or \\\"EFQ index\\\". An EFQ edit consists of a thorough technical edit providing detailed comments to the writer, a written report summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the information unit in each of the eight categories, and the EFQ index, which is a relative score on a scale of 1 to 100. This paper describes the EFQ process, how it improves the quality of information, and how it is expected to predict customer satisfaction. It also discusses the benefits to editors and writers, summarizing interviews conducted with those who have used the EFQ process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPCC 96: Communication on the Fast Track. IPCC 96 Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPCC 96: Communication on the Fast Track. IPCC 96 Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1996.552609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPCC 96: Communication on the Fast Track. IPCC 96 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1996.552609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Editing for quality (EFQ) is a process used by writers and editors at IBM's Santa Teresa Software Development laboratory to ensure information deliverables will meet customers' requirements and expectations. This editing process includes an overall appraisal of the information unit as a numeric score, or "EFQ index". An EFQ edit consists of a thorough technical edit providing detailed comments to the writer, a written report summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the information unit in each of the eight categories, and the EFQ index, which is a relative score on a scale of 1 to 100. This paper describes the EFQ process, how it improves the quality of information, and how it is expected to predict customer satisfaction. It also discusses the benefits to editors and writers, summarizing interviews conducted with those who have used the EFQ process.