自适应图形抽象测试与生成练习

Bertalan Radostyán, B. Forstner, Luca Szegletes, K. Pomázi, László Gazdi
{"title":"自适应图形抽象测试与生成练习","authors":"Bertalan Radostyán, B. Forstner, Luca Szegletes, K. Pomázi, László Gazdi","doi":"10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Figural abstraction test was proven to be one of the best ways of measuring intelligence. Over the last year we have been working on a smartphone version of such a test which included adaptiveness. When the user is solving the test, the difficulty of the next exercise is determined by the previously answered questions, meaning if the majority of the answers were correct, the difficulty level is raised, otherwise lowered. In this application the exercises were randomly generated using pre-determined patterns. This way the number of different exercises were significantly higher than in the case of such a test, where all the exercises are created one by one. The next step is to make the generation of these patterns automatic, thus raising the number of differently generated exercises even more. We use a description language to describe the logic behind the exercises, calling the different logics rules. One of the major challenges is to determine which of these rules are solvable by humans, thus are usable in the test. We are planning on doing this by formulating conditions. If these conditions are met in a generated rule, the rule is considered solvable. The second problem is determining the difficulty of each rule. A naive difficulty level can be determined for each rule based on how many different entities it contains and other similar factors. This difficulty level can be later on fine-tuned by a series of tests made by a group of people, whose intelligence level is determined by a different test.","PeriodicalId":440408,"journal":{"name":"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive figurai abstraction test with generated exercises\",\"authors\":\"Bertalan Radostyán, B. Forstner, Luca Szegletes, K. Pomázi, László Gazdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Figural abstraction test was proven to be one of the best ways of measuring intelligence. Over the last year we have been working on a smartphone version of such a test which included adaptiveness. When the user is solving the test, the difficulty of the next exercise is determined by the previously answered questions, meaning if the majority of the answers were correct, the difficulty level is raised, otherwise lowered. In this application the exercises were randomly generated using pre-determined patterns. This way the number of different exercises were significantly higher than in the case of such a test, where all the exercises are created one by one. The next step is to make the generation of these patterns automatic, thus raising the number of differently generated exercises even more. We use a description language to describe the logic behind the exercises, calling the different logics rules. One of the major challenges is to determine which of these rules are solvable by humans, thus are usable in the test. We are planning on doing this by formulating conditions. If these conditions are met in a generated rule, the rule is considered solvable. The second problem is determining the difficulty of each rule. A naive difficulty level can be determined for each rule based on how many different entities it contains and other similar factors. This difficulty level can be later on fine-tuned by a series of tests made by a group of people, whose intelligence level is determined by a different test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGINFOCOM.2016.7804570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

图形抽象测验被证明是测量智力的最佳方法之一。在过去的一年里,我们一直致力于智能手机版本的测试,其中包括适应性。当用户解决测试时,下一个练习的难度是由之前回答的问题决定的,这意味着如果大多数答案是正确的,难度级别就会提高,否则就会降低。在这个应用程序中,练习使用预先确定的模式随机生成。这样,不同练习的数量明显高于这种测试的情况,在这种测试中,所有的练习都是一个接一个创建的。下一步是使这些模式的生成自动化,从而进一步增加不同生成的练习的数量。我们使用描述语言来描述练习背后的逻辑,称之为不同的逻辑规则。主要的挑战之一是确定哪些规则是人类可以解决的,从而在测试中可用。我们计划通过制定条件来做到这一点。如果在生成的规则中满足这些条件,则认为该规则是可解决的。第二个问题是确定每个规则的难度。可以根据每个规则包含的不同实体的数量和其他类似因素来确定朴素难度级别。这个难度等级可以稍后通过一组人进行的一系列测试进行微调,这些人的智力水平是由另一种测试确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptive figurai abstraction test with generated exercises
Figural abstraction test was proven to be one of the best ways of measuring intelligence. Over the last year we have been working on a smartphone version of such a test which included adaptiveness. When the user is solving the test, the difficulty of the next exercise is determined by the previously answered questions, meaning if the majority of the answers were correct, the difficulty level is raised, otherwise lowered. In this application the exercises were randomly generated using pre-determined patterns. This way the number of different exercises were significantly higher than in the case of such a test, where all the exercises are created one by one. The next step is to make the generation of these patterns automatic, thus raising the number of differently generated exercises even more. We use a description language to describe the logic behind the exercises, calling the different logics rules. One of the major challenges is to determine which of these rules are solvable by humans, thus are usable in the test. We are planning on doing this by formulating conditions. If these conditions are met in a generated rule, the rule is considered solvable. The second problem is determining the difficulty of each rule. A naive difficulty level can be determined for each rule based on how many different entities it contains and other similar factors. This difficulty level can be later on fine-tuned by a series of tests made by a group of people, whose intelligence level is determined by a different test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When the "truth" can (softly) hurt. Effects of political orientation on different forms of parody How cognitive infocommunications play a critical role in shaping the future of forensic sciences defining forensic cognitive infocommunications Compassion, empathy and sympathy expression features in affective robotics Can we detect speakers' empathy?: A real-life case study Analyzing the expression of annoyance during phone calls to complaint services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1