政党不是公民慈善机构:运动、解散和选民组成的变化

P. John, Florian Foos
{"title":"政党不是公民慈善机构:运动、解散和选民组成的变化","authors":"P. John, Florian Foos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2604806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to non-partisan GOTV campaigns, political parties do not aim to increase turnout across the board. Instead, their principal goal is to affect the outcome of an election in their favour. This paper uses a randomized field experiment to test the effects of Conservative Party door-to-door canvassing and leafleting on the turnout of registered voters who support different parties in an English Parliamentary constituency during the 2014 European Elections. Using commonly-used light-touch campaign interventions, randomly assigned leaflets and door-knocks changed the composition of the electorate in favour of the Conservative Party, by decreasing turnout overall. Increasing turnout among Conservative and unattached voters went hand-in-hand with decreasing turnout among supporters of rival parties such as Labour. Moreover, in contrast to the non-partisan GOTV literature, we show that partisan door-knocks did not affect the composition of the electorate over and above what we would expect from impersonal campaign leaflets alone. We conclude that the campaign tactic of contacting supporters, opponents and unattached voters alike, was very effective as a campaign tactic, but had negative effects on political participation.","PeriodicalId":371785,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Campaigns (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parties Are No Civic Charities: Campaigns, Demobilization, and the Changing Composition of the Electorate\",\"authors\":\"P. John, Florian Foos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2604806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In contrast to non-partisan GOTV campaigns, political parties do not aim to increase turnout across the board. Instead, their principal goal is to affect the outcome of an election in their favour. This paper uses a randomized field experiment to test the effects of Conservative Party door-to-door canvassing and leafleting on the turnout of registered voters who support different parties in an English Parliamentary constituency during the 2014 European Elections. Using commonly-used light-touch campaign interventions, randomly assigned leaflets and door-knocks changed the composition of the electorate in favour of the Conservative Party, by decreasing turnout overall. Increasing turnout among Conservative and unattached voters went hand-in-hand with decreasing turnout among supporters of rival parties such as Labour. Moreover, in contrast to the non-partisan GOTV literature, we show that partisan door-knocks did not affect the composition of the electorate over and above what we would expect from impersonal campaign leaflets alone. We conclude that the campaign tactic of contacting supporters, opponents and unattached voters alike, was very effective as a campaign tactic, but had negative effects on political participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Campaigns (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Campaigns (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Campaigns (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

与无党派的GOTV竞选不同,各政党的目标并不在于全面提高投票率。相反,他们的主要目标是影响对他们有利的选举结果。本文采用随机场实验的方法,检验了2014年欧洲议会选举期间,保守党上门拉票和散发传单对英国议会选区不同党派登记选民投票率的影响。使用常用的轻触式竞选干预,随机分发传单和上门拜访,通过降低总体投票率,改变了选民的组成,使之有利于保守党。保守党和无党派选民的投票率不断上升,而工党等对手政党支持者的投票率却在下降。此外,与非党派的GOTV文献相比,我们表明,党派敲门并不会影响选民的组成,而不仅仅是我们所期望的非个人的竞选传单。我们得出的结论是,联系支持者、对手和无党派选民的竞选策略都是非常有效的竞选策略,但对政治参与有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parties Are No Civic Charities: Campaigns, Demobilization, and the Changing Composition of the Electorate
In contrast to non-partisan GOTV campaigns, political parties do not aim to increase turnout across the board. Instead, their principal goal is to affect the outcome of an election in their favour. This paper uses a randomized field experiment to test the effects of Conservative Party door-to-door canvassing and leafleting on the turnout of registered voters who support different parties in an English Parliamentary constituency during the 2014 European Elections. Using commonly-used light-touch campaign interventions, randomly assigned leaflets and door-knocks changed the composition of the electorate in favour of the Conservative Party, by decreasing turnout overall. Increasing turnout among Conservative and unattached voters went hand-in-hand with decreasing turnout among supporters of rival parties such as Labour. Moreover, in contrast to the non-partisan GOTV literature, we show that partisan door-knocks did not affect the composition of the electorate over and above what we would expect from impersonal campaign leaflets alone. We conclude that the campaign tactic of contacting supporters, opponents and unattached voters alike, was very effective as a campaign tactic, but had negative effects on political participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Information Needed to Present in a Fundraising Campaign through Equity Crowdfunding The US 2020 Election and Learning from History Reputation shocks and Strategic Responses in Electoral Campaigns Open or Closed? How List Type Affects Electoral Performance, Candidate Selection, and Campaign Effort Do CEOs Affect Employees' Political Choices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1