不同自适应控制策略在噪声消除应用中的比较研究

Amruta Madhukar Dabhade, P. Kanjalkar
{"title":"不同自适应控制策略在噪声消除应用中的比较研究","authors":"Amruta Madhukar Dabhade, P. Kanjalkar","doi":"10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the system identification and noise cancellation has been done and further the adaptive control algorithms like LMS(Least mean square),NLMS(normalized least mean square),NLMF(normalized least mean forth) and RLS(recursive least square) filters are compared. System identification identifies an unknown system given an input and output. It is used in active vibration and noise control applications. The LMS algorithm has lowest computations involved than all other ones. RLS is a computationally complex filter algorithm but it works more efficiently. In all of these filter algorithms, the weight coefficient is continuously updated until the convergence is reached. These algorithms are implemented and are compared by using parameters such as MSE (mean square error), PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio), convergence, complexity and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":297285,"journal":{"name":"2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA)","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Different Adaptive Control Strategies in Noise Cancellation Applications\",\"authors\":\"Amruta Madhukar Dabhade, P. Kanjalkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the system identification and noise cancellation has been done and further the adaptive control algorithms like LMS(Least mean square),NLMS(normalized least mean square),NLMF(normalized least mean forth) and RLS(recursive least square) filters are compared. System identification identifies an unknown system given an input and output. It is used in active vibration and noise control applications. The LMS algorithm has lowest computations involved than all other ones. RLS is a computationally complex filter algorithm but it works more efficiently. In all of these filter algorithms, the weight coefficient is continuously updated until the convergence is reached. These algorithms are implemented and are compared by using parameters such as MSE (mean square error), PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio), convergence, complexity and accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA)\",\"volume\":\"209 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对系统进行了辨识和噪声消除,并对LMS(最小均方)、NLMS(归一化最小均方)、NLMF(归一化最小均方)和RLS(递归最小二乘)滤波器等自适应控制算法进行了比较。系统识别识别给定输入和输出的未知系统。它用于主动振动和噪声控制应用。与其他算法相比,LMS算法的计算量最少。RLS是一种计算复杂的滤波算法,但它的工作效率更高。在所有这些滤波算法中,权重系数都是不断更新的,直到达到收敛。对这些算法进行了实现,并通过MSE(均方误差)、PSNR(峰值信噪比)、收敛性、复杂度和精度等参数进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Different Adaptive Control Strategies in Noise Cancellation Applications
In this paper, the system identification and noise cancellation has been done and further the adaptive control algorithms like LMS(Least mean square),NLMS(normalized least mean square),NLMF(normalized least mean forth) and RLS(recursive least square) filters are compared. System identification identifies an unknown system given an input and output. It is used in active vibration and noise control applications. The LMS algorithm has lowest computations involved than all other ones. RLS is a computationally complex filter algorithm but it works more efficiently. In all of these filter algorithms, the weight coefficient is continuously updated until the convergence is reached. These algorithms are implemented and are compared by using parameters such as MSE (mean square error), PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio), convergence, complexity and accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Prosodic features for the degree of emotions of an Assamese Emotional Speech MCU system based on IEC61508 for Autonomous Functional safety platform Comparative analysis of facial recognition models using video for real time attendance monitoring system Analysis of using IoT Sensors in Healthcare units Supported by Cloud Computing Human Friendly Smart Trolley with Automatic Billing System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1