关节内注射PRP、臭氧及臭氧+PRP治疗骨关节炎的疗效观察。

Lale Yeprem, Aysegul Ellialtioglu, J. Baeza-Noci
{"title":"关节内注射PRP、臭氧及臭氧+PRP治疗骨关节炎的疗效观察。","authors":"Lale Yeprem, Aysegul Ellialtioglu, J. Baeza-Noci","doi":"10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.10904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and some joints are effected more than others. The prevalence of OA increases with age and it represents the major problem for functional impairment in older patients. Non-surgical treatment with oral drugs is not suitable for many patients suffering from gastric disorders, high blood pressure or different heart diseases. Intra-articular injections are a promising solution in these cases. \nThis study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of ozone injections, PRP (platelet rich plasma) injections and combined ozone plus PRP injections in patients with symptomatic knee OA. \n120 patients were diagnosed of OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and included into this study. Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups (40 patients each group). We include patients whose VAS score was 5 or above. Patients with inflammatory, endocrine and metabolic disturbances, and patients who had meniscectomy within the past 10 years, extra articular surgery within the last year, arthrocentesis in last 6 months or any drug given intra-articular were not included. We did not include either patients with misalignment. \nPatients in the first group were treated with intra-articular injections of ozone/oxygen gas mixture 2 times/week, at 10 µg/mL concentration and a volume of 5 mL for a total of 12 injections. \nPatients in the second group were treated only with PRP injections once a week for a total of 3 times. \nPatients in the third group were treated with intra-articular injections of Ozone+PRP (10 µg/ml concentration, 5 ml volume) once a week for a total of 3 times. \nThe pain levels of patients were measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Side effects were collected using an open list record. \nAll the groups improved their baseline VAS in a significant way, although the group with the best results was group 3 with the combination of ozone and PRP in the same injection. \nWe are planning further studies including systemic ozone in order to improve more the pain in our patients.","PeriodicalId":137241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of intra-articular PRP, Ozone and Ozone+PRP injections in patients with osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Lale Yeprem, Aysegul Ellialtioglu, J. Baeza-Noci\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.10904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and some joints are effected more than others. The prevalence of OA increases with age and it represents the major problem for functional impairment in older patients. Non-surgical treatment with oral drugs is not suitable for many patients suffering from gastric disorders, high blood pressure or different heart diseases. Intra-articular injections are a promising solution in these cases. \\nThis study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of ozone injections, PRP (platelet rich plasma) injections and combined ozone plus PRP injections in patients with symptomatic knee OA. \\n120 patients were diagnosed of OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and included into this study. Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups (40 patients each group). We include patients whose VAS score was 5 or above. Patients with inflammatory, endocrine and metabolic disturbances, and patients who had meniscectomy within the past 10 years, extra articular surgery within the last year, arthrocentesis in last 6 months or any drug given intra-articular were not included. We did not include either patients with misalignment. \\nPatients in the first group were treated with intra-articular injections of ozone/oxygen gas mixture 2 times/week, at 10 µg/mL concentration and a volume of 5 mL for a total of 12 injections. \\nPatients in the second group were treated only with PRP injections once a week for a total of 3 times. \\nPatients in the third group were treated with intra-articular injections of Ozone+PRP (10 µg/ml concentration, 5 ml volume) once a week for a total of 3 times. \\nThe pain levels of patients were measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Side effects were collected using an open list record. \\nAll the groups improved their baseline VAS in a significant way, although the group with the best results was group 3 with the combination of ozone and PRP in the same injection. \\nWe are planning further studies including systemic ozone in order to improve more the pain in our patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ozone Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ozone Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.10904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.10904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)是最常见的关节炎形式,有些关节比其他关节受到的影响更大。骨性关节炎的患病率随着年龄的增长而增加,它代表了老年患者功能损害的主要问题。许多患有胃病、高血压或不同心脏疾病的患者,不适合口服药物进行非手术治疗。在这些病例中,关节内注射是一种很有希望的解决方案。本研究比较臭氧注射、富血小板血浆(PRP)注射及臭氧+ PRP联合注射治疗症状性膝关节炎的疗效和安全性。根据美国风湿病学会的标准诊断为OA的120例患者纳入本研究。患者随机分为3组,每组40例。我们纳入了VAS评分为5分或以上的患者。不包括炎症、内分泌和代谢紊乱患者,以及过去10年内做过半月板切除术、最近一年内做过关节外手术、最近6个月做过关节穿刺或关节内用药的患者。我们没有纳入任何一个错位患者。第一组患者关节内注射臭氧/氧气混合物2次/周,浓度为10µg/mL,体积为5 mL,共12次注射。第二组患者仅给予PRP注射治疗,每周一次,共3次。第三组患者给予臭氧+PRP关节内注射(浓度10µg/ml,体积5 ml),每周1次,共3次。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量患者疼痛程度。使用开放列表记录收集副作用。所有组的基线VAS均有显著改善,但臭氧与PRP联合使用同一次注射的第3组效果最好。我们正在计划进一步的研究,包括全身臭氧,以改善患者的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of intra-articular PRP, Ozone and Ozone+PRP injections in patients with osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and some joints are effected more than others. The prevalence of OA increases with age and it represents the major problem for functional impairment in older patients. Non-surgical treatment with oral drugs is not suitable for many patients suffering from gastric disorders, high blood pressure or different heart diseases. Intra-articular injections are a promising solution in these cases. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of ozone injections, PRP (platelet rich plasma) injections and combined ozone plus PRP injections in patients with symptomatic knee OA. 120 patients were diagnosed of OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and included into this study. Patients were randomly divided into three equal groups (40 patients each group). We include patients whose VAS score was 5 or above. Patients with inflammatory, endocrine and metabolic disturbances, and patients who had meniscectomy within the past 10 years, extra articular surgery within the last year, arthrocentesis in last 6 months or any drug given intra-articular were not included. We did not include either patients with misalignment. Patients in the first group were treated with intra-articular injections of ozone/oxygen gas mixture 2 times/week, at 10 µg/mL concentration and a volume of 5 mL for a total of 12 injections. Patients in the second group were treated only with PRP injections once a week for a total of 3 times. Patients in the third group were treated with intra-articular injections of Ozone+PRP (10 µg/ml concentration, 5 ml volume) once a week for a total of 3 times. The pain levels of patients were measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Side effects were collected using an open list record. All the groups improved their baseline VAS in a significant way, although the group with the best results was group 3 with the combination of ozone and PRP in the same injection. We are planning further studies including systemic ozone in order to improve more the pain in our patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunological aspects of ozone in rheumatoid arthritis and its role in patients with chronic pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, positive tested for antinuclear antibody (ANA). Ozonucleolysis in cervical radiculopathy – Pakistan experience. Ozone therapy - present and perspective. Medical ozone. Pharmacological mechanisms as basis of its effectiveness on the autoimmune response, vascular disorders, surgery and COVID-19/sars-CoV-2 Immunity prophylaxis with ozone therapy – review report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1