{"title":"更多关于钻石","authors":"V. Shubin","doi":"10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-115-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a rejoinder to the work of Yury S. Skubko, previously published in the Journal of the Institute for African Studies, on Moscow’s relations with De Beers. It is based not only on the available literature but also on the author’s personal experience. The author shows that under the monopoly of this South African company in the field of diamond sales, Soviet organizations, even in the conditions of a South African boycott, were forced to deal with its subordinate structures and the attempts to sideline them were in vain.\n\nIn particular the article analyses the attitude to a controversial agreement signed by the Soviet state-owned “Glavalmalmazzoloto” and De Beers Centenary in 1990, when, like in many other cases in the “Gorbachev’s era” Moscow’s principle stand was eroded for short-term results even personal gains.\n\nThe author comes to the conclusion that the responsibility for Moscow’s dealings with De Beers must be borne not by our country, but above all by the United Kingdom, which allowed De Beers have the headquarters of its Central Selling Organisation (CСO) in London.","PeriodicalId":286957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More about Diamonds\",\"authors\":\"V. Shubin\",\"doi\":\"10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-115-119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is a rejoinder to the work of Yury S. Skubko, previously published in the Journal of the Institute for African Studies, on Moscow’s relations with De Beers. It is based not only on the available literature but also on the author’s personal experience. The author shows that under the monopoly of this South African company in the field of diamond sales, Soviet organizations, even in the conditions of a South African boycott, were forced to deal with its subordinate structures and the attempts to sideline them were in vain.\\n\\nIn particular the article analyses the attitude to a controversial agreement signed by the Soviet state-owned “Glavalmalmazzoloto” and De Beers Centenary in 1990, when, like in many other cases in the “Gorbachev’s era” Moscow’s principle stand was eroded for short-term results even personal gains.\\n\\nThe author comes to the conclusion that the responsibility for Moscow’s dealings with De Beers must be borne not by our country, but above all by the United Kingdom, which allowed De Beers have the headquarters of its Central Selling Organisation (CСO) in London.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Institute for African Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Institute for African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-115-119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute for African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2019-46-1-115-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章是对尤里·s·斯库布科(Yury S. Skubko)先前发表在《非洲研究所杂志》(Journal of The Institute for African Studies)上的关于莫斯科与戴比尔斯关系的文章的回应。它不仅以现有文献为基础,而且以作者的个人经历为基础。作者指出,在这家南非公司在钻石销售领域的垄断下,即使在南非抵制的情况下,苏联组织也被迫同它的下属机构打交道,把它们排除在外的企图是徒劳的。这篇文章特别分析了苏联国有企业“Glavalmalmazzoloto”与戴比尔斯百年纪念公司(De Beers Centenary)在1990年签署的一项有争议的协议,当时,就像“戈尔巴乔夫时代”的许多其他案例一样,莫斯科的原则立场被短期结果甚至个人利益所侵蚀。作者得出结论,莫斯科与戴比尔斯交易的责任不应由我国承担,而应首先由英国承担,因为英国允许戴比尔斯将其中央销售组织(CСO)的总部设在伦敦。
The article is a rejoinder to the work of Yury S. Skubko, previously published in the Journal of the Institute for African Studies, on Moscow’s relations with De Beers. It is based not only on the available literature but also on the author’s personal experience. The author shows that under the monopoly of this South African company in the field of diamond sales, Soviet organizations, even in the conditions of a South African boycott, were forced to deal with its subordinate structures and the attempts to sideline them were in vain.
In particular the article analyses the attitude to a controversial agreement signed by the Soviet state-owned “Glavalmalmazzoloto” and De Beers Centenary in 1990, when, like in many other cases in the “Gorbachev’s era” Moscow’s principle stand was eroded for short-term results even personal gains.
The author comes to the conclusion that the responsibility for Moscow’s dealings with De Beers must be borne not by our country, but above all by the United Kingdom, which allowed De Beers have the headquarters of its Central Selling Organisation (CСO) in London.