Azam Doustmohammadinan, N. Omidvar, Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi, H. Eini-Zinab, M. Amini, M. Abdollahi, Saeedeh Esfandyari, Zeynab Amirhamidi
{"title":"食品和营养素养(FNLIT)与儿童健康饮食行为相关","authors":"Azam Doustmohammadinan, N. Omidvar, Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi, H. Eini-Zinab, M. Amini, M. Abdollahi, Saeedeh Esfandyari, Zeynab Amirhamidi","doi":"10.52547/nfsr.8.3.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The objective of the current study was to investigate associations between food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) and eating behaviors of elementary school children in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 803 students aged 10–12 years were participated from 44 primary schools in Tehran, Iran. A valid, reliable self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate participants’ food and nutrition literacy. A research-made questionnaire was used to assess eating behaviors of the students. Furthermore, the multinomial adjusted odds ratios of food and nutrition literacy for eating behaviors were analyzed. Results: Food and nutrition literacy cognitive domain included understanding food and nutrition information and nutritional health knowledge. Food and nutrition literacy skill domain included functional, interactive, critical food and nutrition literacy, food choice and food label literacy. High levels of food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.60), irregular lunch intakes compared to everyday eating lunch (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.40, CI = 0.17–0.93; 3–6 times a week, OR = 0.45, CI = 0.25–0.80) and irregular dinner intakes compared to everyday eating dinner (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.68). High food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were attributed to never eating sausage/hamburger (OR = 2.20, CI = 1.01–4.83) and eating salty snacks 3–4 times a week (OR = 2.58, CI = 1.09–6.13). The FNLIT scores in the skill domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (3-6 times a week, OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13–0.78). Food and nutrition literacy scores in the skill domain were positively associated to never eating sweet snacks (OR = 4.19, CI = 1.39–12.62). Conclusions: The current manuscript highlights the necessity of continuous improvements in health education curriculum of schools in Iran, particularly highlighting the importance of greater attention needs to practical and skillbased lessons rather than theoretical lessens. Further studies with long-term follow-up plans are needed to understand associations between food and nutrition literacy and eating behaviors more comprehensively.","PeriodicalId":325113,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Food Sciences Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) is Associated to Healthy Eating Behaviors in Children\",\"authors\":\"Azam Doustmohammadinan, N. Omidvar, Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi, H. Eini-Zinab, M. Amini, M. Abdollahi, Saeedeh Esfandyari, Zeynab Amirhamidi\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/nfsr.8.3.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: The objective of the current study was to investigate associations between food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) and eating behaviors of elementary school children in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 803 students aged 10–12 years were participated from 44 primary schools in Tehran, Iran. A valid, reliable self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate participants’ food and nutrition literacy. A research-made questionnaire was used to assess eating behaviors of the students. Furthermore, the multinomial adjusted odds ratios of food and nutrition literacy for eating behaviors were analyzed. Results: Food and nutrition literacy cognitive domain included understanding food and nutrition information and nutritional health knowledge. Food and nutrition literacy skill domain included functional, interactive, critical food and nutrition literacy, food choice and food label literacy. High levels of food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.60), irregular lunch intakes compared to everyday eating lunch (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.40, CI = 0.17–0.93; 3–6 times a week, OR = 0.45, CI = 0.25–0.80) and irregular dinner intakes compared to everyday eating dinner (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.68). High food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were attributed to never eating sausage/hamburger (OR = 2.20, CI = 1.01–4.83) and eating salty snacks 3–4 times a week (OR = 2.58, CI = 1.09–6.13). The FNLIT scores in the skill domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (3-6 times a week, OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13–0.78). Food and nutrition literacy scores in the skill domain were positively associated to never eating sweet snacks (OR = 4.19, CI = 1.39–12.62). Conclusions: The current manuscript highlights the necessity of continuous improvements in health education curriculum of schools in Iran, particularly highlighting the importance of greater attention needs to practical and skillbased lessons rather than theoretical lessens. Further studies with long-term follow-up plans are needed to understand associations between food and nutrition literacy and eating behaviors more comprehensively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Food Sciences Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Food Sciences Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/nfsr.8.3.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Food Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/nfsr.8.3.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
背景和目的:本研究的目的是调查伊朗德黑兰小学生食物和营养素养(FNLIT)与饮食行为之间的关系。材料与方法:在本横断面研究中,来自伊朗德黑兰44所小学的803名10-12岁的学生参与了研究。一份有效、可靠的自我管理问卷被用来调查参与者的食物和营养素养。采用研究问卷对学生的饮食行为进行评估。此外,多项调整的食物和营养素养对饮食行为的优势比进行了分析。结果:食品与营养素养认知领域包括了解食品与营养信息和营养健康知识。食品和营养素养技能领域包括功能性、互动性、批判性食品和营养素养、食品选择和食品标签素养。与每天吃早餐(每周1-2次,OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17-0.60)相比,高水平的认知领域食物和营养素养得分与不规律的早餐摄入呈负相关,与每天吃午餐(从不/每周1-2次,OR = 0.40, CI = 0.17-0.93;每周3-6次,OR = 0.45, CI = 0.25-0.80)和不规律的晚餐摄入量与每天吃晚餐(从不/每周1-2次,OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17-0.68)相比。认知领域的高食物和营养素养得分归因于从不吃香肠/汉堡包(OR = 2.20, CI = 1.01-4.83)和每周吃3-4次咸零食(OR = 2.58, CI = 1.09-6.13)。与每天吃早餐相比,技能领域的FNLIT分数与不规律早餐摄入量呈负相关(每周3-6次,OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13-0.78)。技能领域的食物和营养素养得分与从不吃甜食呈正相关(OR = 4.19, CI = 1.39-12.62)。结论:目前的手稿强调了不断改进伊朗学校健康教育课程的必要性,特别强调了更多关注实践和技能课程而不是理论课程的重要性。为了更全面地了解食物和营养素养与饮食行为之间的关系,需要进一步的研究和长期随访计划。
Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) is Associated to Healthy Eating Behaviors in Children
Background and Objectives: The objective of the current study was to investigate associations between food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) and eating behaviors of elementary school children in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 803 students aged 10–12 years were participated from 44 primary schools in Tehran, Iran. A valid, reliable self-administered questionnaire was used to investigate participants’ food and nutrition literacy. A research-made questionnaire was used to assess eating behaviors of the students. Furthermore, the multinomial adjusted odds ratios of food and nutrition literacy for eating behaviors were analyzed. Results: Food and nutrition literacy cognitive domain included understanding food and nutrition information and nutritional health knowledge. Food and nutrition literacy skill domain included functional, interactive, critical food and nutrition literacy, food choice and food label literacy. High levels of food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.60), irregular lunch intakes compared to everyday eating lunch (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.40, CI = 0.17–0.93; 3–6 times a week, OR = 0.45, CI = 0.25–0.80) and irregular dinner intakes compared to everyday eating dinner (never/1–2 times a week, OR = 0.32, CI = 0.17–0.68). High food and nutrition literacy scores in the cognitive domain were attributed to never eating sausage/hamburger (OR = 2.20, CI = 1.01–4.83) and eating salty snacks 3–4 times a week (OR = 2.58, CI = 1.09–6.13). The FNLIT scores in the skill domain were negatively associated to irregular breakfast intakes compared to everyday eating breakfast (3-6 times a week, OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13–0.78). Food and nutrition literacy scores in the skill domain were positively associated to never eating sweet snacks (OR = 4.19, CI = 1.39–12.62). Conclusions: The current manuscript highlights the necessity of continuous improvements in health education curriculum of schools in Iran, particularly highlighting the importance of greater attention needs to practical and skillbased lessons rather than theoretical lessens. Further studies with long-term follow-up plans are needed to understand associations between food and nutrition literacy and eating behaviors more comprehensively.