计算电磁学中DGTD算法与FVTD算法的比较研究

Cong Deng, Wen-lu Yin, S. Chai, J. Mao
{"title":"计算电磁学中DGTD算法与FVTD算法的比较研究","authors":"Cong Deng, Wen-lu Yin, S. Chai, J. Mao","doi":"10.1109/CSO.2010.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By calculating some typical electromagnetic problems, the performances of the FVTD algorithm and the DGTD algorithm for computational electromagnetics are compared systematically, including the choice of the time step, the numerical accuracy, the CPU time and the memory requirement. The FVTD algorithm is more efficient for electrically small structure and is more accuracy for the structure with curved surface, but is not suitable for large scale electromagnetic phenomenon simulating. The DGTD is more resource consuming, but it is more accurate and has the potential ability to handle electrically large structure.","PeriodicalId":427481,"journal":{"name":"2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the DGTD Algorithm and the FVTD Algorithm in Computational Electromagnetics\",\"authors\":\"Cong Deng, Wen-lu Yin, S. Chai, J. Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSO.2010.222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By calculating some typical electromagnetic problems, the performances of the FVTD algorithm and the DGTD algorithm for computational electromagnetics are compared systematically, including the choice of the time step, the numerical accuracy, the CPU time and the memory requirement. The FVTD algorithm is more efficient for electrically small structure and is more accuracy for the structure with curved surface, but is not suitable for large scale electromagnetic phenomenon simulating. The DGTD is more resource consuming, but it is more accurate and has the potential ability to handle electrically large structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSO.2010.222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSO.2010.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过对一些典型电磁问题的计算,比较了FVTD算法和DGTD算法在计算电磁学中的性能,包括时间步长的选择、数值精度、CPU时间和内存需求。FVTD算法对电小结构具有较高的效率,对曲面结构具有较高的精度,但不适合大规模的电磁现象模拟。DGTD消耗更多的资源,但它更精确,并具有处理大型电气结构的潜在能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of the DGTD Algorithm and the FVTD Algorithm in Computational Electromagnetics
By calculating some typical electromagnetic problems, the performances of the FVTD algorithm and the DGTD algorithm for computational electromagnetics are compared systematically, including the choice of the time step, the numerical accuracy, the CPU time and the memory requirement. The FVTD algorithm is more efficient for electrically small structure and is more accuracy for the structure with curved surface, but is not suitable for large scale electromagnetic phenomenon simulating. The DGTD is more resource consuming, but it is more accurate and has the potential ability to handle electrically large structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Internal Fraud Risk of Chinese Commercial Banks A Fast Bidirectional Method for Mining Maximal Frequent Itemsets A Prediction of the Monthly Precipitation Model Based on PSO-ANN and its Applications On the Analysis of Performance of the Artificial Tribe Algorithm Analysis on the Volatility of SHIBOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1