超越人脸的视频操作:人机分析的数据集

Trisha Mittal, Ritwik Sinha, Viswanathan Swaminathan, J. Collomosse, Dinesh Manocha
{"title":"超越人脸的视频操作:人机分析的数据集","authors":"Trisha Mittal, Ritwik Sinha, Viswanathan Swaminathan, J. Collomosse, Dinesh Manocha","doi":"10.1109/WACVW58289.2023.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As tools for content editing mature, and artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithms for synthesizing media grow, the presence of manipulated content across online media is increasing. This phenomenon causes the spread of misinformation, creating a greater need to distinguish between “real” and “manipulated” content. To this end, we present Videosham, a dataset consisting of 826 videos (413 real and 413 manipulated). Many of the existing deepfake datasets focus exclusively on two types of facial manipulations-swapping with a different subject's face or altering the existing face. Videosham, on the other hand, contains more diverse, context-rich, and human-centric, high-resolution videos manipulated using a combination of 6 different spatial and temporal attacks. Our analysis shows that state-of-the-art manipulation detection algorithms only work for a few specific attacks and do not scale well on Videosham. We performed a user study on Amazon Mechanical Turk with 1200 participants to understand if they can differentiate between the real and manipulated videos in Videosham. Finally, we dig deeper into the strengths and weaknesses of performances by humans and SOTA-algorithms to identify gaps that need to be filled with better AI algorithms. We present the dataset here11VideoSham dataset link..","PeriodicalId":306545,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video Manipulations Beyond Faces: A Dataset with Human-Machine Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Trisha Mittal, Ritwik Sinha, Viswanathan Swaminathan, J. Collomosse, Dinesh Manocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WACVW58289.2023.00071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As tools for content editing mature, and artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithms for synthesizing media grow, the presence of manipulated content across online media is increasing. This phenomenon causes the spread of misinformation, creating a greater need to distinguish between “real” and “manipulated” content. To this end, we present Videosham, a dataset consisting of 826 videos (413 real and 413 manipulated). Many of the existing deepfake datasets focus exclusively on two types of facial manipulations-swapping with a different subject's face or altering the existing face. Videosham, on the other hand, contains more diverse, context-rich, and human-centric, high-resolution videos manipulated using a combination of 6 different spatial and temporal attacks. Our analysis shows that state-of-the-art manipulation detection algorithms only work for a few specific attacks and do not scale well on Videosham. We performed a user study on Amazon Mechanical Turk with 1200 participants to understand if they can differentiate between the real and manipulated videos in Videosham. Finally, we dig deeper into the strengths and weaknesses of performances by humans and SOTA-algorithms to identify gaps that need to be filled with better AI algorithms. We present the dataset here11VideoSham dataset link..\",\"PeriodicalId\":306545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WACVW58289.2023.00071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WACVW58289.2023.00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着内容编辑工具的成熟,以及基于人工智能(AI)的媒体合成算法的发展,在线媒体上被操纵的内容越来越多。这种现象导致了错误信息的传播,更需要区分“真实”和“被操纵”的内容。为此,我们提出了Videosham,这是一个由826个视频组成的数据集(413个真实视频和413个操纵视频)。许多现有的深度伪造数据集只关注两种类型的面部操作——与不同受试者的面部交换或改变现有的面部。另一方面,Videosham包含更多样化、内容丰富、以人为中心的高分辨率视频,使用6种不同的空间和时间攻击的组合进行操纵。我们的分析表明,最先进的操作检测算法仅适用于少数特定的攻击,并且在Videosham上不能很好地扩展。我们在亚马逊土耳其机器人上对1200名参与者进行了一项用户研究,以了解他们是否能区分Videosham中的真实视频和伪造视频。最后,我们深入挖掘人类和sota算法性能的优缺点,以确定需要用更好的人工智能算法填补的空白。我们在这里展示了数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Video Manipulations Beyond Faces: A Dataset with Human-Machine Analysis
As tools for content editing mature, and artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithms for synthesizing media grow, the presence of manipulated content across online media is increasing. This phenomenon causes the spread of misinformation, creating a greater need to distinguish between “real” and “manipulated” content. To this end, we present Videosham, a dataset consisting of 826 videos (413 real and 413 manipulated). Many of the existing deepfake datasets focus exclusively on two types of facial manipulations-swapping with a different subject's face or altering the existing face. Videosham, on the other hand, contains more diverse, context-rich, and human-centric, high-resolution videos manipulated using a combination of 6 different spatial and temporal attacks. Our analysis shows that state-of-the-art manipulation detection algorithms only work for a few specific attacks and do not scale well on Videosham. We performed a user study on Amazon Mechanical Turk with 1200 participants to understand if they can differentiate between the real and manipulated videos in Videosham. Finally, we dig deeper into the strengths and weaknesses of performances by humans and SOTA-algorithms to identify gaps that need to be filled with better AI algorithms. We present the dataset here11VideoSham dataset link..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subjective and Objective Video Quality Assessment of High Dynamic Range Sports Content Improving the Detection of Small Oriented Objects in Aerial Images Image Quality Assessment using Semi-Supervised Representation Learning A Principal Component Analysis-Based Approach for Single Morphing Attack Detection Can Machines Learn to Map Creative Videos to Marketing Campaigns?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1