{"title":"背靠背式MMC与M3C大功率交流/交流变换器的比较","authors":"Shenquan Liu, Xifan Wang, Biyang Wang, Pengwei Sun, Qian Zhou, Yong Cui","doi":"10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.","PeriodicalId":117485,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C as high power AC/AC converters\",\"authors\":\"Shenquan Liu, Xifan Wang, Biyang Wang, Pengwei Sun, Qian Zhou, Yong Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C as high power AC/AC converters
Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.