背靠背式MMC与M3C大功率交流/交流变换器的比较

Shenquan Liu, Xifan Wang, Biyang Wang, Pengwei Sun, Qian Zhou, Yong Cui
{"title":"背靠背式MMC与M3C大功率交流/交流变换器的比较","authors":"Shenquan Liu, Xifan Wang, Biyang Wang, Pengwei Sun, Qian Zhou, Yong Cui","doi":"10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.","PeriodicalId":117485,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C as high power AC/AC converters\",\"authors\":\"Shenquan Liu, Xifan Wang, Biyang Wang, Pengwei Sun, Qian Zhou, Yong Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

分频传输系统(FFTS)是一种很有前途的海上风电集成解决方案。背靠背模块化多电平变换器(MMC)和模块化多电平矩阵变换器(M3C)被普遍认为是下一代交流/交流变换器的两种有前途的候选器件。本文对背靠背MMC和M3C进行了详细的比较,特别强调了它们的总电容和半导体额定值。首先分析了手臂电流和电容纹波,然后给出了220 kV、500 MW的对比结果。在基于峰值电流和基于rms电流的总半导体额定值方面,M3C分别大42.56%和22.97%,而其总电容器额定值仅为背靠背MMC的33.15%。根据定量比较结果和半导体和电容器的最新价格,可以确定较好的候选产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C as high power AC/AC converters
Fractional frequency transmission system (FFTS) is a promising solution to offshore wind power integration. The back-to-back modular multilevel converter (MMC) and modular multilevel matrix converter (M3C) are universally regarded as two promising ac/ac converter candidates of the next generation. This paper performs a detailed comparison between back-to-back MMC and M3C with special emphasis on their total capacitor and semiconductor ratings. The arm current and capacitor ripples are first analyzed, then comparison results of a 220 kV, 500 MW case is given. In terms of peak-current-based and RMS-current-based total semiconductor ratings the M3C is 42.56 % and 22.97 % larger respectively, while its total capacitor rating is merely 33.15% of the back-to-back MMC. The better candidate can be determined according to the quantitative comparison results and the latest prices of semiconductors and capacitors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electric Vehicle charging management algorithm for a UK low-voltage residential distribution network An optimization model of EVs charging and discharging for power system demand leveling A circuit approach for the propagation analysis of voltage unbalance emission in power systems A novel high-power AC/AC modular multilevel converter in Y configuration and its control strategy Comprehensive optimization for power system with multiple HVDC infeed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1