{"title":"机载型雷达的探测前跟踪处理","authors":"J. Kramer, W. S. Reid","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A real-time feasible track-before-detect process for a scanning pulsed Doppler airborne-type radar is described. Robust distribution-free based ranking is applied in range separately for each Doppler. A dynamic programming process is used to select a best tentative track passing through each range, azimuth, and Doppler cell. The process sequentially optimizes smoothed rank as the field of view is scanned. Results of a simulation are presented for a system with multiple bursts at a given pulse repetition frequency. Track detections are obtained with probability 0.5 at a signal-to-noise ratio of about 5 dB for a Rician signal pulse noise model as measured at the Doppler outputs. The corresponding false track generation rate is estimated to be 5*10/sup -5/ per processed resolution cell.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":441674,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Track-before-detect processing for an airborne type radar\",\"authors\":\"J. Kramer, W. S. Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A real-time feasible track-before-detect process for a scanning pulsed Doppler airborne-type radar is described. Robust distribution-free based ranking is applied in range separately for each Doppler. A dynamic programming process is used to select a best tentative track passing through each range, azimuth, and Doppler cell. The process sequentially optimizes smoothed rank as the field of view is scanned. Results of a simulation are presented for a system with multiple bursts at a given pulse repetition frequency. Track detections are obtained with probability 0.5 at a signal-to-noise ratio of about 5 dB for a Rician signal pulse noise model as measured at the Doppler outputs. The corresponding false track generation rate is estimated to be 5*10/sup -5/ per processed resolution cell.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":441674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Track-before-detect processing for an airborne type radar
A real-time feasible track-before-detect process for a scanning pulsed Doppler airborne-type radar is described. Robust distribution-free based ranking is applied in range separately for each Doppler. A dynamic programming process is used to select a best tentative track passing through each range, azimuth, and Doppler cell. The process sequentially optimizes smoothed rank as the field of view is scanned. Results of a simulation are presented for a system with multiple bursts at a given pulse repetition frequency. Track detections are obtained with probability 0.5 at a signal-to-noise ratio of about 5 dB for a Rician signal pulse noise model as measured at the Doppler outputs. The corresponding false track generation rate is estimated to be 5*10/sup -5/ per processed resolution cell.<>