爱沙尼亚学前托儿机构的校长、教师和家长的价值观

Pärje Ülavere, M. Veisson
{"title":"爱沙尼亚学前托儿机构的校长、教师和家长的价值观","authors":"Pärje Ülavere, M. Veisson","doi":"10.15405/EJSBS.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current study was to find out, what the values of Estonian preschool childcare institutions’ principals, teachers, and parents. The Estonian language version of the Portrait Value Questionnaire, developed by S. H. Schwartz, was used as a research method. Altogether 978 respondents from all over Estonia participated in the study, including 163 preschool childcare institutions’ principals, 425 teachers and 390 parents. The values of preschool principals, teachers, and parents were rather similar. In all groups, the highest evaluations were assigned to values related to benevolence (both caring and dependability) and the lowest to power (both dominance and resources). The results indicated that principals, compared to teachers, valued higher dominance and tolerance, while teachers gave higher evaluations to personal security and conforming to rules. Compared to principals and teachers, parents gave significantly higher evaluations to resources. Also, parents valued dominance higher than teachers and hedonism more than principals. © 2015 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Values of Estonian Preschool Childcare Institutions' Principals, Teachers, and Parents\",\"authors\":\"Pärje Ülavere, M. Veisson\",\"doi\":\"10.15405/EJSBS.160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the current study was to find out, what the values of Estonian preschool childcare institutions’ principals, teachers, and parents. The Estonian language version of the Portrait Value Questionnaire, developed by S. H. Schwartz, was used as a research method. Altogether 978 respondents from all over Estonia participated in the study, including 163 preschool childcare institutions’ principals, 425 teachers and 390 parents. The values of preschool principals, teachers, and parents were rather similar. In all groups, the highest evaluations were assigned to values related to benevolence (both caring and dependability) and the lowest to power (both dominance and resources). The results indicated that principals, compared to teachers, valued higher dominance and tolerance, while teachers gave higher evaluations to personal security and conforming to rules. Compared to principals and teachers, parents gave significantly higher evaluations to resources. Also, parents valued dominance higher than teachers and hedonism more than principals. © 2015 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk\",\"PeriodicalId\":164632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是找出爱沙尼亚学前托儿机构的校长、教师和家长的价值观。爱沙尼亚语版本的肖像价值问卷,由S. H. Schwartz开发,被用作研究方法。爱沙尼亚全国共有978名受访者参与了这项研究,其中包括163名学前托儿机构的校长、425名教师和390名家长。幼儿园校长、教师和家长的价值观非常相似。在所有的小组中,最高的评价被分配给与仁慈(包括关心和可靠)有关的价值观,最低的评价被分配给权力(包括统治和资源)。结果表明,校长对支配欲和宽容度的评价高于教师,教师对个人安全感和遵守规则的评价高于教师。家长对资源的评价明显高于校长和教师。此外,家长比老师更看重支配地位,比校长更看重享乐主义。©2015由未来学院出版www.FutureAcademy.org.uk
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Values of Estonian Preschool Childcare Institutions' Principals, Teachers, and Parents
The aim of the current study was to find out, what the values of Estonian preschool childcare institutions’ principals, teachers, and parents. The Estonian language version of the Portrait Value Questionnaire, developed by S. H. Schwartz, was used as a research method. Altogether 978 respondents from all over Estonia participated in the study, including 163 preschool childcare institutions’ principals, 425 teachers and 390 parents. The values of preschool principals, teachers, and parents were rather similar. In all groups, the highest evaluations were assigned to values related to benevolence (both caring and dependability) and the lowest to power (both dominance and resources). The results indicated that principals, compared to teachers, valued higher dominance and tolerance, while teachers gave higher evaluations to personal security and conforming to rules. Compared to principals and teachers, parents gave significantly higher evaluations to resources. Also, parents valued dominance higher than teachers and hedonism more than principals. © 2015 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude and Perceptions towards Basic Life Support Training among Student Teachers in a Malaysian University The Development of Artique - Independent Artists and Online Art Criticism Analysis of Personal-Professional Status of Women Managers for Sustainable School Management in Turkey Enforced Isolation: How does it affect the Psychosocial and Physical Development of Children? Online Assessment: How Effectively Do They Measure Student Learning at the Tertiary Level?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1