YouTube一代的数字评估:21世纪法律教育的反思实践

Nigel L. Firth, C. Newbery-Jones
{"title":"YouTube一代的数字评估:21世纪法律教育的反思实践","authors":"Nigel L. Firth, C. Newbery-Jones","doi":"10.22459/CP01.2019.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews the use of an innovative form of digital assessment and reflective practice on a new Dispute Resolution Skills (DRS) module at Plymouth Law School. Although this is a localised study involving a relatively small cohort of 80 students, it has much wider potential relevance because its digital platforms and assessment strategies can be utilised with larger cohorts, nationally and internationally, as well as in other skills-based disciplines outside of law. The benefits in enhancing students’ transferable skills that are inherent in the revised module are also universally applicable.","PeriodicalId":135601,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital assessment for the YouTube generation: Reflective practice in 21st-century legal education\",\"authors\":\"Nigel L. Firth, C. Newbery-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/CP01.2019.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews the use of an innovative form of digital assessment and reflective practice on a new Dispute Resolution Skills (DRS) module at Plymouth Law School. Although this is a localised study involving a relatively small cohort of 80 students, it has much wider potential relevance because its digital platforms and assessment strategies can be utilised with larger cohorts, nationally and internationally, as well as in other skills-based disciplines outside of law. The benefits in enhancing students’ transferable skills that are inherent in the revised module are also universally applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/CP01.2019.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/CP01.2019.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章回顾了普利茅斯法学院在新的争议解决技能(DRS)模块上使用创新形式的数字评估和反思实践。尽管这是一项涉及80名学生的相对较小的本地研究,但它具有更广泛的潜在相关性,因为它的数字平台和评估策略可以用于国内和国际上更大的群体,以及法律以外的其他基于技能的学科。修订后的模块所固有的提高学生可转移技能的好处也普遍适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital assessment for the YouTube generation: Reflective practice in 21st-century legal education
This chapter reviews the use of an innovative form of digital assessment and reflective practice on a new Dispute Resolution Skills (DRS) module at Plymouth Law School. Although this is a localised study involving a relatively small cohort of 80 students, it has much wider potential relevance because its digital platforms and assessment strategies can be utilised with larger cohorts, nationally and internationally, as well as in other skills-based disciplines outside of law. The benefits in enhancing students’ transferable skills that are inherent in the revised module are also universally applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using legal policy and law reform as assessment Prepared for practice? Assessment for the Bar, 1975–2015 Digital assessment for the YouTube generation: Reflective practice in 21st-century legal education Take-home exams: Developing professionalism via assessment Of tails and dogs: Standards, standardisation and innovation in assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1